Showing posts with label #blamegame. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #blamegame. Show all posts

Monday, August 24, 2026

Trump proclaims ‘WE DON’T NEED CANADA’ as he threatens new 50% tariffs on cars and auto parts

Trump proclaims ‘WE DON’T NEED CANADA’ as he threatens new 50% tariffs on cars and auto parts

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-canada-tariffs-car-auto-deal-b3038273.html 

Trump proclaims ‘WE DON’T NEED CANADA’ as he threatens new 50% tariffs on cars and auto parts

President Donald Trump’s justification for starting the trade war is not based in reality

Video Player Placeholder
Canadian dollar slides as US tariff fight threatens to drag on

President Donald Trump threatened to punish American car owners and buyers by unilaterally imposing a 50 percent import tax on any car or auto parts produced in Canada, escalating the unprovoked trade war he has been waging against America’s northern neighbor since returning to power last year.

In a Monday post on Truth Social, Trump accused Ottawa of “ripping off the United States of America for years” with what he described as “ridiculously high tariffs on our Farmers and farm products” that have allegedly “made life impossible” and “created a 60 Billion Dollar Deficit between our two Countries.”

He added that the trade deficit, which he alleged was at least $60 billion, was “not sustainable” and said he’d impose a 50 percent tariff “on all Cars, Trucks, both large and small, Automotive Parts, and Steel” starting on January 1, 2027. He also remarked that Canada would not be “treated like a state” even though Canada is treated like another country that has had a free trade agreement with the United States for years — one that Trump’s first administration negotiated.

“On Trade, and in other ways, also, they are among the worst Nations in the World to deal with. They feel entitled, and yet, WE DON’T NEED CANADA, THEY NEED US! They do 95% of their business with the U.S., with us, the exact opposite,” he said.

US President Donald Trump has threatened new 50 percent tariffs on cars made in Canada. He continues to push a trade war with Canada, led by Prime Minister Mark Carney
US President Donald Trump has threatened new 50 percent tariffs on cars made in Canada. He continues to push a trade war with Canada, led by Prime Minister Mark Carney (Getty Images)

The president’s claim that Canada taxes American agricultural imports at an unfair rate is not accurate because the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement negotiated during his first term permits such tariffs on products that exceed import quotas as a way of protecting their domestic industries — the same way the U.S. protects domestic agricultural industries.

His threat of new 50 percent taxes on auto imports comes just a day after Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said in a speech that Ottawa had “worked intensively and in good faith” towards a renewed trade deal with Washington, only to see Trump’s negotiators “ask too much and offer too little.”

In the televised address, Carney noted that Trump’s justifications for the ever-increasing tariffs on Canadian goods have shifted countless times since Trump returned to the White House and started the unprovoked trade war, “from fentanyl to taxes on U.S. tech giants, to certification of U.S. aircraft, to the sharing of tolls of a bridge that Canada built and paid for, to our dairy policy, to provincial decisions to not sell American alcohol during a trade war, to a television advertisement that quoted Ronald Reagan, to smoke from wildfires.”

Canada and the US have renewed threats over imports and exports in recent days. Pictured: The Port of Montreal
Canada and the US have renewed threats over imports and exports in recent days. Pictured: The Port of Montreal (AFP/Getty)

Carney also implied that Ottawa could retaliate by cutting off energy supplies to America and pointed out that Trump’s claim of a trade deficit was based on statistics that include the massive amount of energy purchased from Canada by U.S. consumers, to the tune of “99 percent of their natural gas imports, 85 percent of their electricity imports, 60 percent of their crude oil imports.”

“I don’t think they want us to stop sending any of that energy,” he said.

The former Bank of England head said there had previously been “important progress” towards a deal that would have been “mutually beneficial” to both the U.S. and Canada until last week, when Washington’s negotiators pushed for new terms that would have been “uneconomic, unfair, and undermined the net benefits to Canada, and called into question the reliability of any deal.”

He added that the latest from Washington had laid bare the fact that the Trump administration is not committed to a true “economic partnership” with Canada and noted that he had ordered his negotiators to return home at that point.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

34Comments

Sunday, August 9, 2026

The Real Reason Rand Paul Put a DOJ Target on Anthony Fauci’s Back

 

The Real Reason Rand Paul Put a DOJ Target on Anthony Fauci’s Back

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2026/08/rand-paul-doj-republicans-anthony-fauci-contempt.html 

The Real Reason Rand Paul Put a DOJ Target on Anthony Fauci’s Back

A close-up photograph shows Dr. Anthony Fauci seated in a dark leather chair against a softly blurred, light gray background. He is wearing a blue windowpane-patterned suit jacket, a light blue shirt, and a dark polka-dot tie, and he is looking slightly off-camera with a serious, attentive expression.
The 85-year-old Anthony Fauci. Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

Sign up for Executive Dysfunction, a newsletter that highlights one under-the-radar story each week about how Trump is changing the law—or how the law is pushing back. You’ll also receive updates on the latest from Slate’s Jurisprudence team.

Dr. Anthony Fauci is a name most Americans probably didn’t think they would have to hear about again, but Senate Republicans have different plans in mind. This week, the Senate Homeland Security Committee voted to hold Fauci in contempt of court for not answering questions during a hearing meant to force his sworn testimony on the United States’ response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The 85-year-old scientist invoked his right to plead the Fifth Amendment more than 100 times and Republicans eviscerated him for this, arguing that because former President Joe Biden preemptively pardoned Fauci, he no longer could claim Fifth Amendment protection. This is simply false, and in fact, Republicans themselves are continuing to give Fauci legal cover to stay silent as they pursue a farcical investigation against yet another perceived political enemy.

Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, chair of the Homeland Security Committee, has long despised Fauci, going so far as to suggest the scientist should be thrown in prison. Paul alleges Fauci lied to Congress about the origins of the deadly virus and that he unnecessarily pressured states to close schools down during the pandemic, mask up, and mandate vaccination. Fauci has denied all of this, but with an emboldened GOP consuming Washington, Paul has found his time to strike. Days before Fauci was scheduled to testify, Paul released more than 1,000 pages of Fauci’s personal diary, in which the scientist chronicled behind-the-scenes meetings and discussions with Trump White House officials, fellow scientists, and doctors alongside his own assumptions and theories about how COVID-19 came to be. And this week, Republican Sen. Ron Johnson, who also sits on the Homeland Security Committee, announced he had gained possession of Fauci’s government-issued cellphone, courtesy of the Department of Health and Human Services.

The Biden administration foresaw this political attack and preemptively pardoned Fauci, along with lawmakers who served on the House Select Committee on Jan. 6 and members of the Biden family. For Fauci, this pardon protects all of his actions taken between 2014 through January 19, 2025, from federal prosecution only. On its face, this would make it seem as though Fauci is perfectly safe from Paul and other potentially vindictive Republicans still salty about mask and vaccine mandates from five years ago. That is not so.

“When [Fauci] went into that hearing, he had at least two reasons to be concerned that he could have criminal liability resulting from what he says,” Frank Bowman, professor emeritus of law at the University of Missouri and a former federal and state prosecutor, told me. “First, the possibility that he might say something false and be prosecutable for perjury under federal law. Second, possibility that something he said might conceivably be used by some state government to prosecute him criminally.”

Bowman explained that the nature of Fauci’s job during the pandemic, which was over the course of about three years, required him to make many public statements on a variety of different platforms, from congressional hearings to TV hits, scientific conferences, consumer-facing events, and classrooms. This makes it pretty easy for a maliciously disposed senator or prosecutor to find some inconsistency between what Fauci may have said the other day versus something he said five years ago. “The other thing is that Fauci’s views over time, like those of any good scientist, changed in varying degrees on varying topics,” Bowman said.

This is particularly true when it comes to Fauci’s diary, where Paul and other Republicans can easily cherry-pick certain entries and find a way to demonstrate inconsistencies from a “harried government official trying to respond to a global calamity,” Bowman said. “What he says throughout that record, taken sequentially, is not always going to be entirely consistent. And sometimes there are going to be changes of view.”

Another critical point that likely also supported Fauci’s decision to plead the Fifth is the fact that it is simply naive at this point to assume the Justice Department is operating with even an ounce of integrity. “In olden times—that is, before two years ago—I think one in Dr. Fauci’s position could have confidently relied on the Justice Department not to take a referral from an obviously vindictive senator and try to prosecute him,” Bowman said. Today, as Todd Blanche prepares to take the top job at the DOJ, the acting attorney general has already proven absolute fealty to President Donald Trump. He’s spent the past 20 months bringing numerous vindictive prosecutions that Trump has demanded, all while committing disturbing abuses of federal law and destroying any semblance of a presumption of regularity. This alone plausibly gives Fauci a reason to abstain from saying a word to Republicans, let alone under oath.

There’s also the fact that at least four states, Florida, Louisiana, Alabama, and West Virginia, have vowed to initiate state investigations against Fauci, where he does not enjoy pardon protection. Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier already issued an investigative subpoena to Fauci this week.

When you consider all of this together, it’s not surprising that Fauci invoked his Fifth Amendment right. Nevertheless, Paul and his fellow Republicans on the Homeland Security Committee voted to hold Fauci in contempt, and now the DOJ gets to decide what to do with him. Bowman doesn’t believe it’s a given that Fauci will be prosecuted, considering Trump has not really said much about him. Plus, Paul is not one of the president’s favorite lackeys, given he’s repeatedly voted to pull U.S. troops out of the Iran war, and said that “by any objective measure we’re worse off than we were before the war.”

However, Fauci’s contempt of Congress is not too dissimilar to when former Attorney General Merrick Garland indicted Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro for failing to show up on Capitol Hill for sworn testimony related to the Jan. 6 insurrection. Both men ended up serving prison time. Plus, in a few short months there’s a strong possibility that the levers of power in Congress will be handed to Democrats, many of whom are frothing at the mouth to investigate Trump and basically every member of his administration; is Fauci the hill Blanche’s DOJ really wants to die on right now?

Say the DOJ does decide to prosecute Fauci for contempt of Congress; Bowman believes that it likely won’t hold up in court anyway. First, Paul bypassed the full Senate and simply held a committee vote, which is technically a violation of internal Senate rules and federal statute. Second, the merits of this case do not bode well for the DOJ, as a judge would likely find Fauci had a constitutional right to plead the Fifth, given Paul’s past comments about him and the ongoing state investigations.

What it seems to be coming down to is Republicans attempting to replicate Trump’s playbook: targeting a longtime foe simply out of spite, knowing deep down it will amount to next to nothing but will possibly succeed in embarrassing Fauci and costing him a pretty penny in legal fees.

Ultimately, like the false commentary about Fauci itself, any attempt to force a prosecution may be much ado about nothing.