Las Vegas is home to a lot that might raise a pair of eyebrows, but a
new art installation depicting Donald Trump as a naked, 43-foot-tall
marionette might raise them right off your face.
Made of foam over rebar and weighing approximately 6,000 pounds, the
gigantic naked Trump will travel the United States as part of the
“Crooked and Obscene Tour” but first, you can see it in person and in
the wild at 13460 Apex Harbor Ln in Las Vegas right now.
Per the tour’s organizers, portraying Trump in the nude “is
intentional, serving as a bold statement on transparency, vulnerability,
and the public personas of political figures.”
They also aim to spark conversation about “transparency—or lack
thereof—in politics, challenging viewers to think critically about
political influence,” according to press materials.
Those who can’t make it to Las Vegas will have opportunity to see it
on tour stops at other locations across the United States. Dates and
cities for the tour have not yet been announced. We’ll keep you posted.
Enjoy — or ‘enjoy’ — some photos of the project below:
Via “Crooked and Obscene”Via “Crooked and Obscene”Via “Crooked and Obscene”Via “Crooked and Obscene”Via “Crooked and Obscene”Via “Crooked and Obscene”Via “Crooked and Obscene”
This isn’t the first time a nude statute of Trump has appeared in
public, though it certainly dwarfs its predecessor. In 2016 Joshua
“Ginger” Monroe was hired at the art collective INDECLINE to create five life-size naked statues of the former president as part of a project called “The Emperor Has No Balls.”
The statues were put up without permits at locations in Seattle, New
York City, Cleveland, Los Angeles and San Francisco; naturally they were
soon removed by police.
From
prescribing spiritual warfare to demonizing health experts, RFK Jr’s
health empire has become a dangerous vehicle for a Christian nationalist
worldview
In February 2025, Robert F Kennedy Jr
began his tenure as secretary of the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) with an unusual message for the federal department
responsible for protecting public health.
America’s
greatest challenge, he said, was not just chronic disease but a
“spiritual malaise”, a kind of soul-sickness derived from America’s
moral decline.
“Spiritual and physical maladies thrive on one another,” Kennedy told
HHS employees in his first address. The solution, he said, “must begin
with a spiritual question”, of personal responsibility and inward
vigilance against the dark forces that would keep Americans “sedated”
and “compliant”.
Weeks later, the White House moved to cut 20,500 jobs across the very agency tasked with protecting public health.
This March, as the US faced its worst measles resurgence in 34 years – one he has largely ignored – Kennedy again warned the nation of the same nebulous threat.
This time, he took a more militant tone. “Malevolent forces”, he told
an audience of doctors-in-training, must be met with “spiritual
warfare”, waged through the “sacred ritual” of eating dinner together as
a family.
Now over a year into his tenure,
Kennedy champions personal discipline while casting institutional
science as a dark force in a cosmic struggle against the light. He has
promoted pseudoscientific or unproven remedies, including vitamin A for
measles, peptides for longevity and the nutritional benefits of raw milk, while sowing doubt about the safety and efficacy of vaccines.
Because
of his granola aura as a former environmental advocate, Kennedy’s
invocation of the “spiritual” can initially sound benign – more hippy
than doctrinaire.
Yet his repeated references to spiritual forces are more than run-of-the-mill wellness vernacular.They are a signal that the Christian nationalist movement that helped propel Trump into office is now reshaping the public health agency from the inside.
The effect is corrosive, eroding the nation’s shared epistemological reality – like a worm working its way through brain tissue.
A war from within
“The
‘warfare’ thing is a dog whistle to stoke Christian nationalist
ideology,” says Savannah Tate, the daughter of megachurch pastor Benny
Tate.
Tate grew up immersed in the movement,
caught between patriarchal forces and biblical literalism. She left the
faith in her early 20s. Now 32 with a doctorate in psychology, she
speaks about her experience publicly.
Christian
nationalists – a sprawling religious-political ecosystem of factions
and networks – argue that American law should reflect a singular
Christian vision of the country. That project would elevate biblical
law, erode the separation of church and state, and hollow out pluralism
and democracy.
Some in the Trump regime openly claim
the label, such as Russell Vought, Trump’s director of the office of
operations and budget and a key author of the ultra-conservative
Christian thinktank Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, which has come to function as a Christian nationalist blueprint for governance.
Terms
such as “spiritual warfare” and “spiritual attack”, Tate says, are
central to the movement’s vocabulary – part of a binary, warcentric and
mystical rhetoric leveraging fear and disinformation to keep people on
their toes against enemies both tangible and spiritual. Maga Christian
nationalism is dominionist, meaning it seeks to place its militant version of Christian authority over institutions, culture and government.
Kennedy’s
speech, taken together with the rhetoric of other Maga leaders,
reflects a broader pattern of strident religious language moving into
the highest levels of government.
Trump
himself described his second term as “a war from within” against
“anti-Christian bias.” JD Vance has courted Turning Point followers by calling Christianity “America’s creed”, advancing the myth that America was founded as a Christian nation, rather than a democracy grounded in equality.
Secretary of defense Pete Hegseth, who belongs to a Christian nationalist church and has a tattoo
of a Christian nationalist symbol, considers America a “Christian
nation in our DNA”. And House speaker Mike Johnson has long backed
Christian nationalist aims that would roll back civil rights for women
and LGBTQ+ people, or sentence doctors who perform abortions to “hard labor”.
Not
all would describe themselves as Christian nationalists. But the label
matters less than the legislation. Regardless of what they call
themselves, the cumulative effect of their language and policy is a
coordinated, full-throated attack on secular democratic institutions
that protect everyone equally.
“I
do think the term ‘Christofascist’ is appropriate theologically as well
as politically,” says the Rev Dr Gary Gunderson, a Baptist minister and
professor of public health science at Wake Forest University School of
Medicine, referring to Trump’s regime.
Christian
nationalism is not a “normal faith”, he says. Believers are far less
concerned about Jesus’s teachings than exercising power from the highest
levels of government all the way down to local counties, he adds. It
has a more aggressive political vision than traditional streams of
Catholic or mainline Protestant faith.
The
Christian flag on display alongside the American flag at a meeting
location for Camp Constitution, a Christian group from New Hampshire. Photograph: Boston Globe/Getty Images
“What
we’re seeing in the US today is the attempt to use religion and
Christian nationalism to erode a scientifically based social contract of
trust between government and the people, and replace it with a more
authoritarian relationship,” adds Gunderson.
The sociologists Joseph Baker, Stephen Perry and Andrew Whitehead, who have studied the movement, write
that because science provides an “alternative source of moral authority
beyond divine revelation”, Christian nationalists perceive
institutional science “as a threat to the supremacy of Christianity”.
Public health’s use of science in the collective interest of all races,
faiths and genders clashes with their hierarchical moral order, in which
Christians are seen as more virtuous and divinely protected than
others.
Tate observes an element of
religious-patriarchical insecurity at play. “It’s a lot about fear of
losing power overall,” she says. “Fear that the more medicine we figure
out and the more we’re able to help people from getting sick, the less
that people will depend on God.”
‘We want the bureaucrats to be traumatically affected’
Inside the HHS, officials are not just talking about war, they’re waging it against scientific consensus and individual experts.
Calley Means, who engineered the Kennedy-Trump alliance and now serves as Kennedy’s senior adviser, took to X to write that Trump and RFK were “quite litterally [sic] fighting demonic forces to return the CDC to real science”.
He
was referring to Demetre Daskalakis – then director of the National
Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases and a gay,
Harvard-educated epidemiologist. Means called him a “proud satanist”
because his Instagram posts reveal he has a pentagram tattoo (a
reference, he says, to overcoming childhood bullying) and has worn a
leather harness with a similar design.
Means, who has workingtieswith
the Heritage Foundation, knew exactly what he was doing by attacking
him. “We want the bureaucrats to be traumatically affected,” as Vought
put it in a private
2023 speech. “When they wake up in the morning, we want them to not
want to go to work, because they are increasingly viewed as the
villains.”
Daskalakis, who resigned in protest
last summer after Kennedy unilaterally fired all 17 members of the
Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, is not a satanist,
according to Poynter Institute factcheckers – and himself.
In fact, he was raised Greek Orthodox, and has a much bigger tattoo of Jesus.
“One of the things that the secretary of health says
frequently is that trusting experts is a feature of religion, not a
feature of democracy,” Daskalakis says. “In fact I think what we’re
seeing is a cultish religiosity,” mired in fundamentalism, spreading
throughout the HHS.
Kennedy has long been the pied piper of the crunchy-to-fascism pipeline,
where wellness culture emulsifies into more conservative Christian
views. This April, Trump rescinded Casey Means’s surgeon general
nomination (officially over her vaccine stance, though some of her critics were discomfited by her pagan-adjacent views). She was replaced by Dr Nicole Saphier, a radiologist and Fox News commentator who defended Hegseth, a former colleague, against allegations of workplace misconduct, and once told an interviewer she “clung” to her Bible through a teenage pregnancy.
A
woman takes a photo of the Make America Healthy Again sign hanging
outside the Department of Health and Human Services in Washington DC. Photograph: Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc/Getty Images
While
Kennedy and Means, in other words, prime the public with spiritual
rationale for dismantling public health, Vought – nicknamed “the Reaper”
– controls funding, and does the demolition, determining which programs
are amputated or left to die.
Vought seems to
detest public health. He was originally hoping to fold the HHS into a
new entity he planned to call “the Department of Health and Public
Welfare” – a name chosen, a former government analyst told the New Yorker, precisely because “it sounds bad”.
According to watchdog Grant Witness,
Vought has slashed $518m from NIH research grants, $698m from the
National Science Foundation, $6.9bn from CDC public health programs and
$28bn from the Environmental Protection Agency. This April, the
administration abruptly fired the entire board of the National Science
Foundation, a major funder of scientific research at US universities. In
a proposed budget for 2027, Vought seeks to cut the HHS budget by $16bn
from 2026.
HHS has cut $389m from the
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, though a
fraction of those funds have been bookmarked for faith-based addiction
programs to address what Kennedy calls “spiritual malaise” underpinning addiction.
The consequences are already visible. The administration has allowed states to increase
access to religious vaccine exemptions. Measles, once eradicated,
infected more than 2,000 Americans in 2025 and more than 1,700 so far in
2026. Last August, the funds needed for the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention to stem a measles outbreak in Texas weren’t available until after two children died.
(While RFK rejects the “anti-vax” label, instead identifying as “pro-safety”,
critics and now courts argue his questioning of vaccines is costing
children their health. Under Senate questioning this April, Kennedy allowed that vaccination might have saved those two Texas children’s lives.)
Driving
these cuts is a neoliberal-theological fusion: the belief that
dismantling public institutions is not just fiscally sound but morally
ordained to combat demonic evils the likes of which, to most
non-Pentecostal ears, sound a lot more exotic than a leather-wearing
public health official.
The Center for
Renewing America, an ultraconservative thinktank founded by Vought, puts
that fusion in writing. In a healthcare blueprint published earlier
this year, it described the Affordable Care Act, which extended coverage to tens of millions of Americans, as “cancerous”, and Medicaid, associated with lower all-cause mortality and access to care, as a “weaponized monstrosity destroying the lives of children”.
Meanwhile, research funding to support new ideas for curing Alzheimer’s and mental health disorders have been cut in half, diabetes by almost 40% and cancer by almost a quarter. Reproductive healthcare is being dismantled, LGBTQ+ people are being erased
from federal policy, and the EPA’s authority to protect Americans from
environmental health hazards such as lead and Pfas is being stripped away.
These
are not abstract losses. Cutting research into the diseases that
disproportionately kill the poor while simultaneously dismantling
protective coverage compounds existing disadvantage. Health inequities
have a greater influence on Americans’ wellbeing than even genetics,
driven by lack of education, poverty, environmental pollution,
structural racism and lack of food access – all of which Kennedy’s HHS
is making worse.
The job of public health is
“about creating health equity”, says Daskalakis. “If equity is something
that they don’t agree with,” he says, “it probably means that they
either don’t understand the importance of that work, or it is somehow
contrary to their mission.”
In exchange for
the infrastructure of the common good, the administration is using tax
incentives to promote inadequate substitutes for insurance that save
them money.
For instance, Republicans and industry lobbyists are advancing
high-deductible health savings accounts (HSAs), which benefit wealthier
people but can mean ruinous upfront medical costs to everyone else.
Lobby groups are also pushing
for subsidies to support more health-sharing ministries – Christian
alternatives to health insurance where churches function as their own
micro-insurers, with members pooling money to cover each another’s
medical expenses – so long as those expenses don’t include abortion or
LGBTQ+ care.
Under this new regime, healthcare
isn’t a shared, national responsibility, it’s an individual purity
test: can you work? Can you afford private coverage? Do you belong to a
church? Do you cook dinner at home? Can you give birth on their terms?
Fail
these tests, and you’re shamed and blamed by the righteously smug:
isn’t it your own bad choices, your diet, your sexual orientation, your
lack of proper faith that put you in this predicament?
Prophets and profiteers
When health fails, and no help is available, it’s tempting to turn to God, supplements or both.
Where
Means and Kennedy find their most profitable common ground with the
Christian nationalist worldview may not be its fire-and-brimstone
zealotry so much as its prosperity gospel tenet: that accumulating
wealth and power is divine. The sicker and more desperate Americans
become, and the weaker the public health system that might support them,
the more lucrative the alternative wellness space grows.
Enter
the “Seven Mountains Mandate”, the Christian nationalist
get-rich-and-powerful strategy. It outlines how believers plan to occupy
top roles across key domains of public life – including media,
government, education and the family – asserting authority over every
facet of society.
The Seven Mountains Mandate recalls a
1990s business executive coaching plan: capture “mountains” (key
institutions and social systems), strip them of collective, progressive
and public-serving elements, and replace them with free-market,
theologically aligned alternatives run by allies.
Christian
nationalists destroy a system to create a vacuum, Boedy explains. Then
they say, “‘OK, well, our friends who are selling this product can move
right in to fill that vacuum.’”
Health isn’t itself a mountain, but it winds through three others: family (restricting reproductive care, promoting
traditional marriage), government (dismantling public health
infrastructure) and business, where the $7tn global wellness industry
represents enormous profit.
Kennedy sits at the center of a financial web. While positioning himself as a vaccine-safety whistleblower, he has earned
more than $2.4m in referral fees from Wisner Baum, a law firm
litigating against pharmaceutical companies over vaccine safety claims.
Robert F Kennedy Jr attends a House energy and commerce hearing on vaccine policy. Photograph: Raphael Liy/Zuma Press Wire/Shutterstock
At
his Senate confirmation hearing, Kennedy refused to commit to stopping
these payments while overseeing the agencies that regulate the vaccines
central to those lawsuits. An initial ethics arrangement would have
allowed him to continue receiving proceeds; only after public scrutiny
was it revised to route payments elsewhere, including to his son.
Kennedy also registered “Make America Healthy Again” as a trademark,
reportedly earning about $100,000 before transferring it to an LLC led
by his ally Del Bigtree. That Maha branding is now marketing for a
broader anti‑vaccine and wellness‑adjacent movement, drawing audiences,
donations and product sales from the climate of distrust in health
institutions Kennedy has helped cultivate.
Calley
Means, meanwhile, co-founded Truemed, a platform that helps people use
HSAs to purchase unscientific wellness sundries sold by Truemed or its
affiliates, such as cold plunge pools and beef hotdogs.
Means’s
policy vision maps straight on to Truemed’s business model: cut federal
healthcare dollars from programs that assist poorer Americans, such as
Medicaid, and boost consumer markets catering to the trendy wellness
whims of the upper middle class. Recently released financial records
reveal Means held between $25 and $50m in Truemed stock while working
as a special government employee advising Kennedy. While he claims to
have divested from the company upon becoming a full-time government
employee, his involvement in it has nevertheless contributed to an
appearance of divided loyalty between his own interests, and those of
the American people.
And the more Kennedy and
Means can destabilize trust in mainstream science, the more some of
their friends and allies can financially benefit.
Potential benefactors include Means’s and Kennedy’s business partner Dr Mark Hyman, who fabricated the ridiculous idea that “11 million people die from food every year … like a Holocaust,” and makes his money from selling detox cleanses, which do not work. According to a recent Public Citizen watchdog report,
Hyman “oversees a wellness empire that stands to benefit significantly
from HHS policies under Kennedy”. They also include Casey Means,
Calley’s sister, a Truemed shareholder.
As
the administration keeps widening the Overton window on physical
maladies being linked to spiritual causes, many citizens will have their
faith and fears exploited by the politicians who were supposed to help
them be safe.
The
people dragging America’s public health system toward a new dark age
are not demonic. Rather, they are morally bankrupt and high on the
supply of theocratic self-righteousness, with no regard to how their
words and actions affect real people’s wellbeing.
Christian nationalist language gives calculated government neglect the sheen of providence.
“God chose Ethan for a reason,” one South Carolina mother told the Independentthis February after her son was paralyzed by measles encephalitis.
“If I knew this could be the outcome, I still wouldn’t have given my son the vaccine,” she said, citing the misleading scare line publicly shared by Kennedy and Trump that children today receive too many shots.
“There will be a miracle,” she believes.
Can you support us this World Press Freedom Day?
0 of 60,000 acts of support
Consider us impressed
Nice: you just finished reading article
the past year. It seems you really value our work. We really value you too.
We
couldn’t help but notice though that while you’re a loyal Guardian
reader, you’re not a recent supporter. (As you likely know, we are
reader-funded. No billionaires behind the scenes here!) With dedicated
people like you who haven’t contributed yet or recently, we often find
one of two things are going on.
First:
perhaps you simply don’t have anything to spare right now. If that's
the case, we want you to know: we value your readership as much as those
who can contribute, and please keep reading, as much as you like,
forever. One of the wonderful values shared by Guardian readers around
the globe is a desire to ease the burden for others. So ignore these
appeals: our community of supporters has your back.
But
if you can afford to spare something, here’s what we also know: most
likely you’ve thought about giving, but for whatever perfectly human
reason, you haven’t got round to it yet. So perhaps today is the day? We
know – you’ve finished reading what you came to read, and you have
other things to get on with. But we promise it’s quick, and even more:
we promise it matters. We survive entirely because people like you
decide to respond to messages like this.
But
if you can afford to spare something, here’s what we also know: most
likely you’ve thought about giving, but for whatever perfectly human
reason, you haven’t got round to it yet. So perhaps today is the day? We
know – you’ve finished reading what you came to read, and you have
other things to get on with. But we promise it’s quick, and even more:
we promise it matters. We survive entirely because people like you
decide to respond to messages like this.
While
all support is gratefully received, and even $5 helps, please consider a
monthly contribution: it takes less than a minute to set up, and it’s
the best way to make the biggest impact – helping sustain our fearless,
independent journalism for the long haul. We’re not going anywhere; we
hope you’ll stick with us too. Thank you for helping protect the
non-billionaire-owned press.