London Calling
Police on My Back
(The Equals cover)
The Guns of Brixton
Tommy Gun
Play Video
The Magnificent Seven / Armagideon Time
Rock the Casbah
Train in Vain
Career Opportunities
Spanish Bombs
Clampdown
Play Video
English Civil War
Should I Stay or Should I Go
I Fought the Law
(The Crickets cover)
London Calling
Police on My Back
(The Equals cover)
The Guns of Brixton
Tommy Gun
Play Video
The Magnificent Seven / Armagideon Time
Rock the Casbah
Train in Vain
Career Opportunities
Spanish Bombs
Clampdown
Play Video
English Civil War
Should I Stay or Should I Go
I Fought the Law
(The Crickets cover)
How Trump's Reflecting Pool vandalism claims and charges fell apart
The
White House is reportedly pressing federal prosecutors to open another
case against a former Olympian accused of vandalizing the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool after President Donald Trump publicly raged against U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s decision to drop charges.
The Department of Justice is exploring whether to pursue additional charges against David Hearn, according to The Wall Street Journal,
despite explicit admissions from administration officials shared with
Pirro’s office that the damage to the pool’s newly applied lining was
likely due to “botched installation.”
Trump spent the weekend insisting that vandals damaged the pool,
including posting court documents on Truth Social stating that a
“highly credible witness” saw 67-year-old former Olympian canoeist David
Hearn “violently” rip the pool’s new blue lining. He said Pirro “should
revisit her hastily made decision.”
Last week, the judge overseeing the case against Hearn agreed to dismiss charges
against him and will hold a hearing next month on whether the dismissal
should be granted “with prejudice,” which would prevent the Justice
Department from charging him for the same alleged conduct.
In a
stunning court filing asking for charges to be dropped against Hearn,
Pirro’s office admitted that the Trump-requested “American flag blue”
sealant at the bottom of the pool started to peel “almost immediately”
after the work was completed following renovations to the site last
month.
(Getty)
The
Department of Interior “provided less than fulsome information at the
outset of this case,” according to the filing from Pirro’s office.
It
was not until after the indictment was filed that the agency determined
that the “damage was the result of a botched installation and not
vandalism,” the filing states.
"The government is continuing to attack an innocent man,” lawyers Hearn said in a statement to The Independent on Monday following the president’s latest attacks.
“Our
first filing in the case on July 10 included photographic evidence from
before Mr. Hearn touched the Reflecting Pool proving that he caused no
damage,” according to the statement from his legal team, which includes
Norm Eisen of Democracy Defenders Fund, Mary Dohrmann of Washington
Litigation Group and Steve Levin of Steptoe LLP.
“Our other
filings provided even more proof. Finally, the U.S. attorney’s own
motion on July 31 admitted the damage was caused by a ‘botched
installation and not vandalism.’ We are reviewing all legal remedies,
including for this continued harassment,” they added. “It is
outrageous.”
In remarks for the Oval Office last month
after Pirro filed to drop charges against Hearn, Trump said his top
prosecutor in Washington, D.C. “folded like an umbrella” and “choked.”
The
shallow pool was outfitted with a dark blue lining and “advanced
nanobubbler technology” to tackle algae blooms that have long plagued
the landmark. Algae returned shortly after the renovations were
complete, and the new sealant started to peel off in chunks that flapped
to the surface.
Evidence “strongly suggests that a rushed and
botched installation” by Atlantic Industrial Coatings “led to the damage
to the lining of the Reflecting Pool,” according to a motion to dismiss
Hearn’s indictment from Pirro’s office.
(Reuters)
Had
the Interior Department “been forthcoming with the information clearly
in its possession, the government would not have sought a grand jury
indictment,” Pirro’s office wrote.
The administration’s documents
“reveal that work on installing the lining almost immediately fell
behind, due to a combination of very rainy and windy weather, repeated
failures of testing on the sealing of the expansion joints, and delays
in obtaining sealing product at the work site,” she wrote.
“The
rush to complete the project led to hasty and botched work that was not
remediated before the project was finished and the fencing removed,”
Pirro added.
In court filings, lawyers for Hearn said the case
against him “was motivated by political considerations and devoid of
adequate factual support” from the beginning.
“Here, amid
extraordinary political pressure and public pronouncements from
President Trump demanding action, and in apparent disregard for their
special duties as prosecutors, [Pirro’s office] rushed to obtain a
public felony indictment,” his lawyers wrote.
“It did so without a
meaningful investigation into the central and obvious question in this
case: whether Mr. Hearn caused, or even could have caused, any damage to
the Reflecting Pool at all,” they added. “Defying both decency and
common sense, the government proceeded to indict Mr. Hearn before it had
obtained or evaluated the information necessary to establish a
good-faith basis for the charge.”
Members of Congress are now investigating.
Rep.
Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, is
pressing Pirro’s office and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum on whether
prosecutors knowingly brought a “bogus indictment” against Hearn.
“Did
President Trump pressure or influence either Department to engage in
wrongful actions against an American citizen?” Raskin wrote in a letter
to the agencies on Tuesday.
“At a minimum, it appears that members
of the Trump administration were ready and willing to imprison an
innocent American for a decade in a desperate effort to soothe an
ex-landlord’s wounded ego about a terrible paint job and wasteful
contract,” he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
London Calling
Police on My Back
(The Equals cover)
The Guns of Brixton
Tommy Gun
Play Video
The Magnificent Seven / Armagideon Time
Rock the Casbah
Train in Vain
Career Opportunities
Spanish Bombs
Clampdown
Play Video
English Civil War
Should I Stay or Should I Go
I Fought the Law
(The Crickets cover)
Provided to YouTube by The Orchard Enterprises
The Nazz · Lord Buckley
Royal Best Of
℗ 2011 Master Classics Records
Released on: 2011-04-01
Auto-generated by YouTube.
Bookmark popover
Removed from bookmarks