Wednesday, November 5, 2025

Republicans’ partial tax plan estimated to cost $5 trillion

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/05/10/republicans-partial-tax-plan-estimated-to-cost-5-trillion-00340347 

 

Republicans’ partial tax plan estimated to cost $5 trillion

House Republicans released a partial text for the GOP tax bill on Friday and are expected to release the full text on Monday.

Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.) is seen.

An early version of the House GOP’s tax plan would cost nearly $5 trillion, according to a new estimate from Congress’s nonpartisan tax scorekeeper.

The cost far exceeds what is permitted by the budget resolution Republicans adopted earlier this year, which set the parameters for the massive package of tax cuts and extensions, energy policy and border security investments the party wants to pass in the coming weeks.

The estimate, released Saturday evening by the Joint Committee on Taxation, also underscores how much hinges on the final details of the plan, which are likely to be unveiled Monday afternoon ahead of a scheduled Tuesday markup by the House Ways and Means Committee, chaired by Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.).

The House Republican-approved budget allows for $4.5 trillion in tax cuts — contingent on the GOP being able to find $2 trillion in spending cuts. Speaker Mike Johnson indicated last week that House Republicans are looking at a skinnier, $4 trillion tax plan, paired with $1.5 trillion in spending cuts.

The partial text of the tax proposal released by the Ways and Means late Friday would make permanent the individual income tax rates, which are otherwise due to expire at the end of the year. It also would extend and temporarily boost far-reaching tax benefits like the standard deduction and the Child Tax Credit.

But this early, so-called skinny version of the tax bill is otherwise silent on President Donald Trump’s biggest tax priorities he touted on the campaign trail, like his proposal to eliminate taxes on tips. It also bears no mention of the expensive business provisions that Republicans want to restore.

The tax plan also doesn’t at this point include any mention of the state and local tax deduction prized by blue state Republicans in swing districts. Last week, a contingent of House Republicans from New York, New Jersey and California indicated that despite weeks of negotiations it was nowhere close to an agreement to lift the $10,000 cap on the deduction. Republicans established that cap in 2017, which helped raise an enormous amount of revenue for the massive tax bill of Trump’s first administration.

Some observers are interpreting the preliminary figures from the Joint Committee on Taxation to forebode the need to secure large tax increases to offset the costs of the larger bill, which Republicans want to pass through the filibuster-skirting budget reconciliation process. Among others offsets, Republicans are looking to cut back the clean energy credits from the Democrats’ 2022 climate law known as the Inflation Reduction Act, and increase tax rates on private foundations.

“The deficit impact of the bill is well above the Ways & Means allowable increase of $4.0 to $4.5 trillion, so lawmakers will either need to make adjustments, include offsets, or both,” wrote the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget in a Saturday evening analysis.

Delaware court grants win for Twitter in first hearing in Musk trial

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/07/19/twitter-elon-musk-trial/

twitter wins first round

 

donald-trump-recruited-by-kgb-in-80s-and-even-has-codename-claims-former-soviet-spy

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jan/29/trump-russia-asset-claims-former-kgb-spy-new-book


https://archive.is/ohI5R


https://www.the-express.com/news/world-news/163709/us-air-force-plane-spy-plane-lands-moscow-carrying-sensitive-cargo-after-putin-invite


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ex-soviet-spy-makes-sensational-kgb-claim-about-trump/ar-AA1zxhrZ


https://www.the-express.com/news/world-news/163709/us-air-force-plane-spy-plane-lands-moscow-carrying-sensitive-cargo-after-putin-invite


https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/us-news/donald-trump-recruited-kgb-codename-34726995


https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/kgb-spy-trump-asset-russia-b1794955.html


https://bylinetimes.com/2025/02/21/donald-trump-was-recruited-by-the-kgb-under-codename-krasnov-claims-former-soviet-spy-chief/


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/donald-trump-recruited-by-kgb-in-80s-and-even-has-codename-claims-former-soviet-spy/ar-AA1zwS2y


https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2025/2/21/2305351/-Magic-Disappearing-DB-Story-About-Allegations-Trump-Was-Recruited-as-a-Russian-Asset


https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2025/2/21/2305375/-Before-Trump-was-exposed-as-Krasnov-and-after


https://www.dailykos.com/story/2025/2/21/2305257/-Krasnov

 

Is Trump Out of Touch, Senile, Nuts, or Something Worse?

 https://www.thedailybeast.com/is-trump-out-of-touch-senile-nuts-or-something-worse/

 

Is Trump Out of Touch, Senile, Nuts, or Something Worse?

David Rothkopf

It was the cringiest of times. It was the craziest of times.

Welcome to a moment in which one of the most consequential debates Americans (and people the world across) are having is about whether the President of the United States is just a national embarrassment or has full-on blown a gasket. Is Donald Trump just three fries short of a happy meal, or is he full-on howling-at-the-moon mad?

One senior official in the last Trump administration told the Daily Beast of presidential appearances in the past few days that Trump “has definitely lost a step.”

A photo illustration of Donald Trump holding up tiny hands.

With respect to one of those appearances, Trump’s meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell offered a similar observation, arguing that the president is “clearly off his game.” Like leaders in other recent presidential meetings, Carney “both humbled and humiliated Trump at the same time without Donald Trump having the slightest idea it was happening,” O’Donnell said, labeling Trump’s oft-repeated proposal that the U.S. annex Canada as “demented.”

That’s a sentiment that many others have also suggested in response to presidential initiatives—from seizing the Panama Canal to watching a TV movie about Alcatraz and hours later suggesting the decrepit prison facility, which has been closed for more than 60 years, should be reopened.

Donald Trump's head on Sean Connery's body from the movie The Rock in front of an image of Alcatraz

Each day we are forced to ask anew, and with more urgency, whether Trump is just an ignorant buffoon not up to the job or whether he is what they might have in the old days called catawampus, past-it, mentally unwell or even broken. How would you categorize the assertion that he doesn’t know whether he is obligated to uphold the Constitution? Has he gone completely Mad King?

Do his top advisers slather him with praise in ways that would make Kim Jong Un blush because Trump is just an egomaniac who needs to be surrounded by fluffers? Or is it something worse than that? Is he so fragile they fear the consequences if they don’t slide on the knee pads and polish his balls until they shine like the rest of his cheeseball throne room?

Trump's Thought Police

And what do the choices he has made about his team of top advisers say about him? Some have clearly been chosen simply because they will follow him blindly. It’s why Marco Rubio gets an additional job every week. Recent performances in front of Congressional committees reveal that others really are just the emptiest of vessels—see for example Kristi Noem (who was this week fileted like a haddock by Senator Chris Murphy over her mismanagement at DHS) or Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy, who has been more out of touch than the radio silence-paralyzed air-traffic controllers who work for him. Putting a wrestling executive who doesn’t know the difference between artificial intelligence and a steak sauce in charge of the future of education in America is just demented.

But other choices Trump has made represent something much worse—something warped and dangerous. They seem to have been made with the intent of doing actual damage to the United States. HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. tops that list. (In a particularly dark irony given the subject of this article, among the areas where Kennedy is embracing the looniest ideas and doing the most damage is mental health, as Norm Ornstein and I discussed on our “Words Matter” podcast this week.) He’s nuts. Picking him was nuts.

President Donald Trump looks at Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. while speaking in the Oval Office at the White House on April 18, 2025 in Washington, D.C.
RFK Jr. is a man who may actually be, among 360 million Americans, the very worst possible choice to head our department of health and human services. Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

But crazy begets crazy, and this week we have seen how it is compounded atop our government in many ways. One such example comes courtesy of RFK Jr., whose first choice for surgeon general, Janette Nesheiwat, flamed out because she may have misrepresented her credentials. Nesheiwat was immediately replaced by a new nominee who doesn’t actually have a license to practice medicine and is an anti-vaxx peddler of meshuga medical theories.

Then consider Trump’s right-wing extremist choice to be the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, Ed Martin, whose nomination crashed and burned because of crumbling GOP support. Trump decided the right person to replace him was Fox News legal commentator Jeanine Pirro, a woman whose own producer at Fox called her “nuts” too.

Trump must also think Americans are “nuts,” and not just because his policies are driving us so. How else to interpret his demonstrating that he has no idea how global trade works? How else to explain the threats to invade Greenland, or the recent decision to shift intelligence assets to back up his bonkers threats?

Uncle Sam in a straight jacket

It is an insult to the collective intelligence of the planet if he decides to call the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of America; if he appoints, as he just did, a former Real Housewife of New Jersey to the Holocaust Museum board; or if he suggests that everything’s hunky-dory with his wife when she has only shown up for work 14 days so far since inauguration.

Sure, it’s hardly important whether the woman at his side is the real first lady or an inflatable HOV lane dummy. But when it’s someone deranged like Laura Loomer or a sociopath like Stephen Miller who plays along with the president’s own bats--t impulses to advance their own dangerous interests, it matters. Because sane or not (and he’s definitely not), when Miller says they’re “looking at” suspending habeas corpus, it is a gravely serious matter.

Trump supporters Siggy Flicker and far-right activist Laura Loomer (second from right) listen as Republican presidential candidate and former President Donald Trump speaks during a rally at Coastal Carolina University on February 10, 2024 in Conway, South Carolina.
When Trump is getting personnel advice from other folks who seem certifiable, like right-wing “influencer” Laura Loomer (second from right) who this week declared the newly chosen Pope Leo XIV to be a “woke Marxist,” it a sign of something several degrees worse than presidential incompetence. Win McNamee/Getty Images

And working tirelessly to destroy our environment, our economy, our system of justice, our national defenses, and our democracy? Working to do it each and every day? Working to do it regardless of the law or the consequences for future generations of Americans? That’s not just a guy who’s off his feed.

We can, of course, further debate which is crazier: Trump’s behavior or electing a guy like him in the first place. In fact, the problems began with his election and will not end until he is stopped by time or by checks and balances in our system or by the electorate.

Photo illustration of Donald Trump walking away from the camera on a red carpet with flags in front of him

But there is also a more chilling possibility that we should not rule out. It is also possible that every bad hire, every profoundly destructive policy initiative, every toxic choice made by Trump is not in fact due to mental defect but, on the contrary, is intentional. That it is consciously thought out and well-executed, part of a plan with the clear intent of destroying our systems as we have known them and further empowering our enemies at home and abroad.

That’s not as funny as the late-night comedian jokes about our slumped, spray-tanned, reality TV windbag president. But it—the possibility that Trump is just the goofy, greedy, generally reprehensible superannuated hand puppet of others whose agenda he is being used to advance—is also, of all the possibilities we may consider for the off-the-rails performance of this government, by far the most likely.

MUST WATCH: Kristi Noem And Chris Murphy Clash Over Kilmar Abrego Garcia

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogbnDRhGE-k

 

May 8, 2025

At today's Senate Appropriations Committee hearing, Sen. Chris Murhpy (D-CT) questioned DHS Sec. Kristi Noem about Kilmar Abrego Garcia.

 

Transcript

into that thank you thank you Vice Chair
Murphy
thank you very much um Madam Secretary
AI is an enormous growing industry
critical to the future economic health
of the country we have had the benefit
over the years of the top talent in AI
researchers students coming to the
United States uh to help us grow that
industry um but for the first time in
the last 15 years um there are more topt
talented individuals and workers in AI
leaving the country than coming here and
the reason is pretty simple um people
who are coming here to work from
overseas through the visa program are
very uncertain about what their rights
are um and that is because of the
actions this administration has taken so
I think it's important to get on the
record uh for those individuals who are
here currently and those thinking of
coming to the United States to work or
to study to understand what their rights
are so let me ask you a a a series of of
of pretty simple questions um the
probably the the key of right uh amongst
the five freedoms is the right to free
speech the right to express your own
personal opinion about politics culture
the economy do you believe that you have
the right to detain or deport a US
citizen for simply expressing their
political opinion a US citizen no no do
you believe that you have the right to
detain or deport a legal permanent
resident for expressing their political
opinion i don't make decisions on legal
status here in the United States the
Department of State does that and I
would say that as they've gone through
an evaluation of who gets a visa who
gets legal status green cards uh they've
been evaluating and discussing um how
that applies well I I acknowledge that
you don't I acknowledge you don't make
but if someone is a legal permanent
resident of the United States i'm not
talking about an H-1B or a student visa
holder i'm talking about a legal
permanent resident if you are a legal
permanent resident do you have the right
to detain or deport that person simply
for expressing their political opinion
the uh Department of State makes those
decisions department you make that you
make that decision about who you have
the right to detain or deport so do you
you are involved in that do you believe
the United States do you believe the law
allows the Department of Homeland
Security under the Trump administration
is enforcing the law following the
constitutional rights of folks who are
here as citizens those who are here
legally and those who are here illegally
so a legal permanent resident is by
definition here legally do you believe I
I mean I think this is really troubling
if you can't answer this simple question
do you believe that the US government
can detain and deport a legal permanent
resident for expressing a political
opinion that the depart that the
administration disagrees with the
determination you're asking for is based
on uh things that you are determining
that the secretary of state has
considered and evaluated we don't
evaluate that the administration along
with a partnership with the department
of state on what is political speech and
what's an affiliation with a foreign
terrorist do you do you believe that's
the difference between that you're
asking that you can detain the
directional permanent resident for
expressing a political we have not
detained or we have not deported anybody
who's a legal permanent resident or
citizen of the United then say you don't
have the ability to do that clarif
clarify that for the millions of that is
exactly what I'm doing is that we have
followed exactly what the law is and
that we have not detained or deported
anybody who's a citizen or has legal
status in this country we are focused on
the worst of the worst dangerous crime
you do not believe you have do not
believe you have the ability to do that
we have not done that at all and the
Trump administration has no plans well
just because you haven't done it doesn't
mean that you won't do it in the future
you believe you have the ability to do
that are doing the exact appropriate
thing in partnership with the Department
of State and in partnership with the
Trump administration have you read the I
I assume you have read the Supreme Court
uh decision in the case of Kilmargo
Garcia yes um that um court decision
requires the administration to
facilitate uh Kilmargo Garcia's release
from El Salvador can you describe the
steps that you have taken uh to
facilitate this release and specifically
can you answer as to whether you have
reached out to your counterpart in El
Salvador to facilitate uh Mr garcia's
release grego Garcia is a citizen of El
Salvador and should never have been in
this country and will not be coming back
to this country there is no scenario
where Garcia will be in the United
States again if he were to come back we
would immediately deport him again
because he is a terrorist he's a human
smuggler and he is a wife beater does
Does the You've read the Supreme Court
decision does the Supreme Court decision
not require you to facilitate the return
of Mr obrego Garcia the Trump
administration is complying with all
court orders and judges orders does does
the does the Supreme Court order require
you to facilitate the return Garcia is a
citizen of El Salvador it is up to the
president of the Al Salvador to make the
decision is coming back it's been a big
topic of conversation between all of us
between the country when the president
visited the United States of America it
was discussed and talked about there the
president has been very clear on this
issue as the secretary of state uh and I
have as well abrego Garcia is not a
citizen of this country and is a
dangerous individual who does not belong
here i will I will end I will not ask
another question Madam Chair
we would immediately The discussion ends
when the Supreme Court rules 90 that you
have to facilitate his release and the
fact that you can't even acknowledge the
the wording of the order which commands
you to facilitate his release and you
advertise to this committee that you are
going to willfully ignore the ruling and
that is incredibly chilling for the
balance of powers in in in a democracy
that relies on the executive branch to
honor decisions made by the highest
court of the land