Showing posts with label economy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label economy. Show all posts

Saturday, May 2, 2026

‘Deplorable’: ICE hires firm accused of ‘torture’ to track down undocumented children

‘Deplorable’: ICE hires firm accused of ‘torture’ to track down undocumented children

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/may/02/ice-contracter-torture-allegations-undocumented-children 

 

A blurry child's head in the foreground, with adult hands operating a cellphone and an ICE badge on a waistband beyond.
A child with his family and an ICE agent in the halls of immigration court at the federal building in New York City on 23 July 2025. Photograph: Michael M Santiago/Getty Images

‘Deplorable’: ICE hires firm accused of ‘torture’ to track down undocumented children

Exclusive: Contractor denies allegations including ‘enforced disappearance’ and will help locate unaccompanied minors

US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has awarded a contract to a private security company that has faced accusations of “torture” and “enforced disappearance” to assist in tracking down undocumented immigrant children who arrived in the US alone, a contracting document shows.

ICE has stepped up its work so much in pursuing these minors in the US that it has contracted out some of its mission to a third party to put “boots on the ground” and locate immigrant children previously released from US government custody.

The agency characterizes the work of tracing immigrant children who reached the US without authorization and were released into communities while they go through immigration court proceedings as “safety and wellness checks”. ICE says it wants to confirm the children’s location, school enrollment and overall wellness, including checking for signs of abuse or trafficking, according to the contracting document.

But an internal ICE document reviewed by the Guardian last year shows ICE actually runs the operations with the aim of deporting the children or pursuing criminal cases against them – or their adult sponsors sheltering them legally in the US. A critic at the time called ICE’s efforts “backdoor family separation”.

“Accusations that ICE is ‘targeting’ and arresting children are FALSE and an attempt to demonize law enforcement,” a DHS spokesperson said on Friday. “Rather than separating families, ICE asks parents if they want to be removed with their children or if the child should be placed with someone safe the parent designates.”

Now, as that program continues, the agency in mid-April gave a contract to a US company, MVM Inc, to assist in carrying out such operations.

MVM is a longtime security contractor, based in Ashburn, Virginia, with about 2,500 employees, and provides detention and transport services to federal immigration agencies. It previously provided security services to the CIA.

MVM did not respond to a detailed request for comment by time of publication.

In 2024, MVM was sued by two Guatemalan fathers and their respective children in a California federal court for alleged “torture, enforced disappearance and cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment”, according to the lawsuit, for the role it played in the family separation policy at the border under the first Trump administration that prompted widespread uproar.

“MVM physically took thousands of children away from their parents and transferred them to shelters,” the lawsuit said. “MVM transported and harbored these children using unmarked vehicles, commercial airlines, and makeshift detention centers.”

MVM asked a judge to toss the lawsuit, saying the company had “openly denounced” the family separation campaign, adding that since it was a private company, it should not be held liable for a US government policy.

The two Guatemalan children, a 16-year-old and a three-year-old, were separated from their respective fathers in 2017, “with the substantial assistance of MVM”, the lawsuit says. The case continues to move through federal court.

In March 2025, a judge dismissed some of the claims on procedural grounds but allowed the case to continue based on the torture, enforced disappearance, and inhuman and degrading treatment claims.

Eighteen different companies offered their services to ICE to assist in the “wellness checks” operation, according to a document posted publicly on a government contracting website. But the other companies that vied for the contract lacked “the critical ‘boots on the ground’ child welfare personnel and infrastructure needed to physically locate and conduct wellness checks on children”, the document said. MVM, however, did appear to have the resources ICE was seeking, according to a review of the document.

The contract is supposed to run for one year. The amount ICE is paying MVM is redacted, along with the number of “wellness checks” the agency wants the company to perform.

“MVM contractors have ZERO immigration enforcement authority. This partnership, as part of the UAC Safety Verification Initiative, represents ICE’s commitment to protect vulnerable children from sexual abuse and exploitation. The primary focus of this initiative is to conduct welfare checks on these children to ensure that they are safe and not being exploited or abused,” the DHS spokesperson added, using the official term for the program to conduct checks on children who immigrated to the US unaccompanied and have been placed with sponsors.

Last year, the Trump administration began efforts to track down immigrant children who had entered the US alone to request asylum or reunite with family members already in the US. Such children largely arrive at the US-Mexico border and either turn themselves in or are apprehended by border officials.

After an unaccompanied immigrant child enters the US, they are placed under the custody of the office of refugee resettlement (ORR). While their immigration cases, which are handled by ICE, play out, ORR will place the children in shelters, in foster homes or under a sponsor’s care if available. Typically, sponsors, who complete an assessment process and background checks, are the children’s relatives in the US; at times, they are unrelated adults.

In the past year, ICE, in partnership with local law enforcement agencies, has begun to track down those children, many of whom the Trump administration says have gone “missing”, to provide “wellness checks”. But the operations have been criticized by many immigration attorneys and advocates.

“This all seems like a ploy to do two things: one, find either kids or their sponsors to arrest and deport. Or, two, scare children into self-deporting,” said Michael Lukens, the executive director of the Amica Center for Immigrant Rights, which provides legal representation to immigrant children. “It’s really deplorable. It’s really concerning.”

For years, Trump administration allies pointed to a 2024 homeland security inspector general report that found that ICE was not able to adequately track unaccompanied minors. They used that report to push a narrative that unaccompanied immigrant children have been lost and trafficked, Lukens said.

“Their parents know where they are, their lawyers know where they are, usually the courts know where they are. It’s just ICE doesn’t have their address in a file,” said Lukens. “Those kids were never missing but they’re using it as an excuse to do these ‘wellness checks’.”

The inspector general report suggested understaffing at ICE and deficient cross-agency communication are mostly to blame for the agency’s inability to keep track of the children, rather than actual trafficking.

MVM is a longtime government contractor that now mostly works with federal agencies to transport immigrant children and families between government-run facilities. It was started in the late 1970s by former Secret Service agents and ballooned into a significant government contractor. The Wall Street Journal reported in 2008 that MVM had a secretive contract with the CIA in Iraq for security guards to protect CIA staff.

MVM also has a track record of allegations of abuse with its previous immigration-related contract work. In 2018, MVM was accused of holding immigrant children in a vacant office building for three weeks amid the family separation crisis under the first Trump administration. During the Covid-19 pandemic, MVM detained immigrant children and families in hotels before they were removed from the country. MVM also had the contract to run the secretive Guantánamo Bay immigration detention center, until it was taken over by another company in 2025. Most recently, last August, the non-profit newsroom Injustice Watch reported that MVM locked an immigrant woman and her baby inside a Chicago hotel for five days.

“We have seen MVM harm children in federal immigration custody in egregious ways for many years now,” said Neha Desai, the managing director of children’s human rights and dignity at the National Center for Youth Law. “It is both deeply disturbing and completely unsurprising that this government has hired MVM to conduct so-called ‘wellness checks’. These checks have already terrorized numerous children and have led to family separation throughout the country.

“What will come next once MVM is involved will surely be even worse,” Desai added.

Tuesday, April 28, 2026

Middle East crisis could cost world $1tn while oil firms make ‘obscene’ profit, analysis finds

Middle East crisis could cost world $1tn while oil firms make ‘obscene’ profit, analysis finds

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/apr/28/middle-east-crisis-oil-firms-profit-colombia-conference 

 

Red oil barrels stacked up on a beach with a container ship in the background
A ‘make polluters pay’ protest demanding oil companies pay for the energy transition, on the coast during the nearby conference in Santa Marta on Monday. Photograph: Iván Valencia/AP

Middle East crisis could cost world $1tn while oil firms make ‘obscene’ profit, analysis finds

Climate group calls for urgent windfall tax on excess fossil fuel profits, as delegates tell Colombia conference their nations are suffering

The Middle East oil and gas crunch will impose as much as a trillion dollars of additional costs on the global economy while petroleum companies rake in spectacular profits from elevated fuel prices, analysis has revealed.

The uneven distribution of risk and reward comes amid rising concern that the US-Israeli attack on Iran is worsening inequality, poverty and hunger across a world that has become dangerously dependent on fossil fuels.

Even if the strait of Hormuz swiftly returns to normal operations, the burden of elevated oil and gas prices will reach about $600bn, according to recent International Monetary Fund figures analysed by the climate campaign organisation 350.org. Should the supply disruption continue, the economic hit to households, businesses and governments could surge above $1tn, it said.

This is likely to be an underestimate because it does not include the substantial knock-on effects of inflation, particularly higher fertiliser and food costs, lower economic activity and rising employment.

A tanker anchored in the strait of Hormuz off the coast of Iran.
A tanker anchored in the strait of Hormuz off the coast of Iran. Photograph: Asghar Besharati/AP

The contrast with the fortunes of US and other non-Gulf-centred petroleum companies could not be more stark. On Tuesday, BP said its profits for the first quarter of the year had more than doubled, after a jump in oil and gas prices linked to the conflict in the Middle East.

Anne Jellema, 350.org’s chief executive, said: “Over the next few days, oil majors will report astronomical first-quarter profits, much of it earned on the back of a war that has already killed thousands and impoverished millions. Even if the strait of Hormuz reopens tomorrow, an obscene amount of money will continue to flow to oil coffers at the expense of ordinary people already struggling to afford fuel, electricity, and food.”

350.org has called for an urgent windfall tax on excess profits, which could raise money for social protection and investments in renewables that are cheaper, cleaner and more reliable than fossil alternatives.

The calls were echoed at the first conference on transitioning away from fossil fuels in Santa Marta, Colombia, where more than 50 nations, dozens of subnational governments and thousands of civil society representatives are pioneering ways to break their dependence on gas, oil and coal.

Several hundred Indigenous and civil society activists marched through the streets of Santa Marta on Monday with banners reading: “No more petroleum” and: “Another way is possible”. Activists briefly blockaded the city’s Drummond coal port, one of the largest in South America. Greenpeace, the environmental campaign organisation, created a huge message in the sand on the nearby Caribbean coast that declared: “Renewables power peace. End fossil fuels.”

Aerial view of Greenpeace members next to a sign in the sand reading “Renewables Power Peace! End Fossil Fuels”
An aerial view of the Greenpeace message. Photograph: Raúl Arboleda/AFP/Getty Images
Dozens of people stand around a selection of banners on the ground, one of which reads: ‘Fossil fuel treaty now’
Activists from different groups coming together for a demonstration during the conference. Photograph: Iván Valencia/AP

Many government representatives said their people were already suffering shortages and hardships.

“We declared a 90-day state of emergency back in March because of the fossil fuel crisis,” said Tina Stege, climate envoy for the Marshall Islands. “Government now shuts down at 3pm every day to save energy. And as the crisis continues we are forced to consider further measures to cut back on services, including infrastructure projects focused on resilience such as seawalls and airport upgrades. We want the trillions that go to propping up fossil fuels to be spent on energy secure renewables instead, with support available to the most vulnerable to make the transition.”

Chipiliro Mpinganjira, deputy minister of natural resources in Malawi, said the oil crisis was worsening living standards in his country, where most people already live below the poverty line. As well as raising costs for transport and food, he said the jump in global fuel prices was forcing the government to consider budget cuts for education to meet debt payments. “We hope the debts can be rescheduled.”

In the longer term, he said, the crisis was likely to force a rethink of energy policies in Africa. “Even if the strait of Hormuz reopens, we know that this can happen again at any time. So we must definitely move away from fossil fuels.”

Crowds of people marching behind a banner
A demonstration during the conference in Santa Marta. Photograph: Iván Valencia/AP

Cedric Dzelu, technical director in Ghana’s ministry of climate change and sustainability, said a protracted oil crisis would bring calamity. “Many countries in Africa are facing collapse if this crisis continues for more than six months. Higher prices will bring protests and this could lead to anarchy.”

Many African nations have countered the oil price rise by cutting fuel taxes, which means lower government revenues for health, education and infrastructure – while in effect giving a subsidy to petroleum companies.

In the longer term, the Planetary Guardians group of former statespeople, scientists and activists warned against propping up industries that were a cause of many of the world’s problems. Even before the Iran war, they calculated governments were spending $1.9m every minute, about $1.05tn a year, subsidising the fossil fuel system. Mary Robinson, a former president of Ireland, said: “Citizens pay for this three times over: at the gas pump, through taxes, and through the damage fossil fuels cause to public health, the planet, and economies.”

Closeup of Robinson speaking
Mary Robinson. Photograph: Raúl Arboleda/AFP/Getty Images

The Planetary Guardians estimate that for every dollar spent on direct fossil fuel subsidies, the poorest 20% of households receive just 8 cents, while the wealthiest 50%, who use more cars, air conditioning and planes, capture nearly 75% of the benefits. Ending these subsidies alone would avoid 70,000 premature deaths from air pollution annually, they say.

The Santa Marta conference is exploring better uses of those funds, including more support for countries to transition away from fossil fuels, and debt relief so less of their foreign exchange reserves are spent on interest repayments.

Robinson said: “I hope Santa Marta will be a pivot point for the climate justice movement.”

Related stories

  • Drive slower, work from home and ditch the tie: the world responds to Iran war energy crisis

  • Gaza war victims take legal action against BP over oil supply to Israel

  • Norway oil firm sued over alleged links to Israeli firm operating in illegal settlements

  • UAE urges countries to honour fossil fuels vow amid Cop29 impasse

  • Secretive court system has awarded over $100bn public money to corporations, finds new analysis

  • Revealed: Saudi Arabia’s grand plan to ‘hook’ poor countries on oil

  • Petrostate windfall tax would help poor countries in climate crisis, says Brown

  • World Bank spent billions of dollars backing fossil fuels in 2022, study finds

More from News

  • Washington dinner shooting
    Press dinner shooting conspiracy theories spread in era of fractured politics

  • Opec
    UAE quits Opec in win for Trump as oil cartel weakened

  • Middle East crisis live
    Trump claims Iran wants US to open strait of Hormuz as soon as possible

  • US politics live
    King to meet Trump off-camera amid clash fears before Charles’ Congress speech

  • US unions
    ‘It feels like a betrayal’: anger as Apple to close US’s first unionized store

  • Poland
    Journalist Andrzej Poczobut freed from prison in Belarus in US-brokered swap deal

  • Business
    Deloitte and Zoom’s trims to parental-leave benefits may hurt them in long run, experts say

  • Massachusetts
    ‘She’s opening the bees!’ US beekeeper jailed for trying to save friend from eviction

Sunday, April 26, 2026

AI goldrush collides with voter backlash in Georgia

AI goldrush collides with voter backlash in Georgia

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/04/26/ai-data-centers-georgia-midterms-00888668 

 

AI goldrush collides with voter backlash in Georgia

Multibillion-dollar artificial intelligence hubs are beginning to scramble politics in the crucial swing state as voters worry about costs and local control.

Joe Reed points to maps of proposed factories and data centers.

Joe Reed, a resident of Jackson, Georgia, shows maps of proposed factories and data centers at his home on April 6, 2026. | Photos by David Walter Banks for POLITICO

By Alec Hernandez and Gabby Miller




FORSYTH, Georgia — A multibillion-dollar data center boom is provoking a bipartisan backlash in one of the nation’s most pivotal political battlegrounds.

Tax breaks, a stable power grid and vast tracts of undeveloped land have made Georgia a mecca for the artificial intelligence industry, with sprawling data center campuses under review or in development across rural acres and the Atlanta suburbs alike.

But public opposition to this growth is starting to bleed into local and statewide elections, including a competitive governor’s race and a Senate contest that could help decide the balance of power in Washington. Meanwhile, leading Republicans and Democrats in the state are still trying to find their footing on the issue, even as strategists and party officials on both sides of the aisle warn that it’s becoming impossible to ignore.

Voters angry about the boom say too many politicians are just failing to listen.

“I can’t picture anybody, including me, voting for anybody who has expressed approval of data centers or who has acted on behalf of them,” said Joe Reed, a 68-year-old retired educator, sitting at his dining room table overlooking a slice of quiet lakeside property on the outskirts of Jackson. The town southeast of Atlanta is just miles from several proposed data center sites. Reed, a political independent, now fears his quiet spot on the lake will be disrupted.

Joe Reed stands for a portrait next to a dock.

Joe Reed, 68, and his wife moved nearly 20 years ago to a quiet lakeside property on the outskirts of Jackson, Georgia — unaware that data centers would someday come.

Greg Head, who lives across the street from a new data megasite in the northern reaches of Forsyth, said he doesn’t oppose data centers in general — but he wanted more say in local officials’ decisions to approve this project.

“I’m going to vote for the individuals here locally that are going to listen to me and listen to us,” said Head, a 49-year-old heating and air conditioning contractor who normally votes for Republicans.

In Georgia, 47 percent of voters oppose data centers being built in their community, according to an Emerson College Polling/Nexstar Media poll from early March, 5 points higher than voters nationally. But neither party has broadly figured out how to talk about the issue, which pits hopes for jobs, tax revenue and economic growth against worries about power bills and water — even as a POLITICO Poll in January showed that data centers pose growing political risks.

“Georgia is a state microcosm of what’s going on across the country, and it’s going to be an information campaign that those of us that are in favor of data centers are going to have to accentuate and amplify,” said John Watson, a former Georgia Republican Party chair who now consults for the data center industry.

A grassy path with trees on both sides is seen.

This land near Rocky Creek Baptist Church is the site of a proposed data center in Forsyth, Georgia.

“There’s no disputing the fact that data centers are a hot topic,” Watson said. But he maintained that the political backlash is “absolutely reversible” — and doubted that the issue will determine who becomes Georgia’s next governor.

Other political veterans see data centers becoming an inevitable part of the state’s most important races.

“Once these campaigns really get moving pretty quickly in the next few weeks, I would be surprised if this doesn’t come up,” said Spiro Amburn, a Republican strategist and former chief of staff to two state House speakers. “At some point these candidates are going to have to articulate what their vision is for data centers and just the general business climate in Georgia.”

One of the first tests of Georgia’s data center politics played out earlier this year, when a special election to fill a state Senate seat became a proxy battle over the area’s burgeoning AI warehouse developments.

One candidate — former Forsyth Mayor Eric Wilson — lost despite having served over a decade in local office because voters associated him with the data center development planned in the city, said Monroe County Republican Party Chair Noah Harbuck, a member of Forsyth’s Planning and Zoning Commission. Steven McNeel, the eventual winner, opposed the industry’s tax breaks and called for safeguards against consumer utility rate hikes.

Wilson, now running for a state House seat, acknowledged that data centers played a role in the race but cautioned against ascribing his loss to the AI hub alone.

“A lot of people can speculate different reasons when you missed something as close as we did in the special,” he said. “Data centers were a factor, and it was discussed in the race. How much of a factor is hard to tell.”

Harbuck supports the Forsyth data project but said it’s clearly a red line for some voters.

Noah Harbuck leans on a car as he stands for a portrait.

Noah Harbuck, Monroe County Republican Party chair and member of the Forsyth Planning and Zoning Commission, stands for a portrait in Forsyth, Georgia.

“It’s just like Christians with abortion: If somebody supports abortion, you’re not gonna vote for that person,” Harbuck said. “I think the majority of people don’t care. But I think there is a lot more people that would say no to data centers than say, ‘Heck yeah.’”

‘We’ll see some bad outcomes in November’

The rest of Georgia’s election calendar includes races with outsize national implications. Among those are Democratic Sen. Jon Ossoff’s bid to hold onto his seat as three Republicans seek to take him on, in a must-win battle for both parties’ hopes of controlling the Senate.

Ossoff told the chair of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in an April letter that his office would investigate data centers’ impacts on utility bills in Georgia. His Republican opponents have said little publicly about the data boom.

The fight is playing out even more acutely in the open governor’s race. Some Democrats are calling for pauses in development and investigations of the centers’ economic and environmental impact. Republicans, meanwhile, say local officials should be the ones making the biggest decisions. And leaders in both parties want to roll back tax incentives for the facilities’ developers.

Several Democratic gubernatorial candidates said they’ve had to field voters’ questions about data centers at their campaign stops regularly. Former Sen. Jason Esteves has held special events aimed at discussing their growth, including most recently a Monday town hall in suburban Atlanta, and has promised to abolish the tax incentives that make Georgia an appealing destination for the industry. Geoff Duncan, a former Republican-turned-Democrat, also wants to overhaul the incentives and thinks communities and local leaders should have more control over where data centers are built.

A shirt opposing new factories is seen.

A shirt opposing new factories is seen at Reed’s home in Jackson, Georgia, on April 6, 2026.

“Every room I walk into there are at least one question about data centers and what my positioning is on it,” he told POLITICO.

The Democratic frontrunner, former Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms, has taken a more hardline approach, suggesting in an interview with the Columbus Ledger-Enquirer that she would halt data center construction pending a review of their impact.

On the Republican side, candidates are on the whole more supportive of the projects at large, but stress that local authorities — on either the municipal or county level — should have the most control over where they are built.

Two Republicans — Lt. Gov. Burt Jones and billionaire Rick Jackson — have come under fire for their own ties to the hubs.

Jackson has invested in a data center in Texas, but none in Georgia. Jones has faced accusations that he pushed for policy changes that opened the door to allowing a sprawling data center to be built in his home county — and in turn benefit his father, who partially owns the land. Jones told POLITICO that neither he nor his family are invested in any local data centers directly.

Rick Jackson speaks with John King and Saul Davidson.

Georgia gubernatorial candidate Rick Jackson, center, converses before a Banks County Republican campaign event April 8 in Homer, Georgia.

The political debate around data centers is “inescapable right now, because the voters here are extremely sophisticated. They know what questions to ask,” said Connie Di Cicco, the legislative director for Georgia Conservation Voters. “They are coming to town halls and asking questions with a level of acumen that is astounding.”

“It’s unavoidable for elected officials to not be addressing this issue. How they’re addressing it is the real question, and whether they’re addressing it in a genuine way to actually be helpful,” she added.

Nationally, Trump is trying to soothe voters’ unhappiness with data centers’ voracious energy needs by striking agreements for tech companies to pay for their own electricity supplies, a move he said would provide “some PR help” for the industry. Experts are still divided on how well that approach will work.

But elected leaders and voters in some states are rejecting the push.

Maine, another Senate battleground, was the first to pass a law banning new data centers through 2027 — an idea popularized by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), who are proposing a nationwide moratorium on new complexes. (Democratic Gov. Janet Mills vetoed the bill Friday.) The city council of Chandler, Arizona, and voters in a small Wisconsin city also rejected data center projects in their areas, while voters in one small town in Missouri this month voted out four council members who had approved a $6 billion data center.

In Georgia, though, state lawmakers’ efforts to suspend developers’ tax breaks, pause data center construction or otherwise respond to unhappy voters have repeatedly fallen short. Those included a GOP-led attempt this year to protect consumers from shouldering rising power costs.

Republican state Sen. Chuck Hufstetler, who sponsored that measure, has warned lawmakers that data centers will be on the ballot this year.

“Everyone should heed that advice and make sure we take care of our consumers, because if not, I think we’ll see some bad outcomes in November,” the northwest Georgia lawmaker told POLITICO.

Geography matters

Middle Georgia voters’ worries about the advent of AI megasites change across county lines.

In Jackson, about 20 miles from Monroe County’s data center developments, several of the nearly dozen residents who spoke with POLITICO expressed more concern about the influx of spring breakers stopping by on a sunny Monday afternoon to tour the area’s “Stranger Things” filming locations.

Most had heard about the data centers — and the ensuing debates — on the local news or in Facebook groups. But many said they did not care about the developments, nor did they see the issue affecting their vote. Even more said they did not know enough to share an opinion.

The Butts County Courthouse is seen a the town square.

The Butts County Courthouse in Jackson, Georgia.

Just a few miles south, voters were more willing to signal their displeasure — both with the nearby data warehouses and with the elected officials who approved them.

Head, the Monroe County resident who is set to live across from one of these sites, runs a heating and air condition company, is an elected school board member and serves on the county’s development authority. After a busy day, he said, he relishes being surrounded by acres of untouched nature.

When Forsyth annexed land across from his home and later approved it as a data center site, Head was furious. Living outside the city’s boundaries, he is unable to vote for the officials who greenlighted the development.

“I think the majority in this county is asking for smart, controlled growth,” Head said. “What that means is, you bring in a data center, you need to put it in a proper place.”

Greg Head sits for a portrait at a table outdoors.

“You bring in a data center, you need to put it in a proper place,” said Monroe County resident Greg Head, who lives across the street from a new data megasite in the northern reaches of Forsyth, Georgia.

Still, he said, he would rather the site be a data center rather than a shipping warehouse or retail space, which would draw more traffic to the backroad he lives near.

Reed, who lives just 20 minutes north, said he and his neighbors have long opposed the development of data centers and shipping warehouses adjacent to their quiet streets. For years, he has staged protests at some of the proposed sites, written letters to their corporate leadership and testified at county meetings across the region. (Reed is a political independent who mounted a third-party run for state representative in 2020 over his general dissatisfaction with both parties.)

He and his wife moved to a quiet spot on the lake nearly 20 years ago, hoping it would serve as a midway point between their adult children and grandchildren in North Carolina and Florida. Had Reed known the data centers were coming, he said, maybe they would have settled elsewhere.

“If you and I would quit using ChatGPT and buying stuff from Amazon, we wouldn’t need them,” he said.

“But that’s not going away.”