Epstein's accountant links settlement payment to Trump accuser by Epstein estate, + Big Names named
Dean Blundell has looked at testimony by Epstein’s personal accountant Richard Kahn before the House Oversight Committee yesterday, and has found it… interesting.
March 12, 2026
Jeffrey Epstein’s personal accountant sat before the House Oversight Committee for seven hours yesterday, and by the end of it, the levy had broken.
Richard Kahn — the man who managed every dollar Epstein moved for over a decade, who was named in Epstein’s will two days before his mysterious death, and who appears more than 50,000 times in the DOJ’s Epstein files — confirmed under congressional questioning that a woman who accused Donald Trump of sexual abuse received a settlement payment from Epstein’s estate.
Epstein’s estate.Trump’s accuser.
A cheque that matches up perfectly with the infamous 53 missing pages and hundreds of thousands of redactions referencing Donald J Trump in abuse accounts so sick, I had a hard time detailing them here:
But wait — there’s more:
Kahn didn’t stop there. He confirmed the names of five “rich and powerful” parties who bankrolled Epstein’s operation:
Les Wexner. Glenn Dubin. Steven Sinofsky. The Rothschilds. Leon Black.
These are the people who transferred significant sums of money to Jeffrey Epstein — a convicted sex trafficker and predator of underage girls. Kahn’s explanation? He thought Epstein was a tax advisor and financial planner. He thought the money was consulting fees.
Nobody believes that. Not one person on that committee. Not one person reading this.
Blundell goes on to describe each of the five and their history with Epstein. It is not hard to look at the information and suspect there’s multiple reasons the Trump regime is fighting so hard to keep the Epstein files under wraps and control what gets released.
And then there’s this:
Kahn wasn’t just Epstein’s number cruncher. He ran Epstein’s financial infrastructure through his company, HBRK Associates Inc. He coordinated wire transfers. He signed cheques. He managed what the DOJ files describe as medical reimbursements for “the girls.” He vouched for Epstein when banks flagged tuition payments to young women. He impersonated Epstein in communications with banks, which he admitted to Congress yesterday. He helped facilitate a fake marriage between two women connected to Epstein, which he also admitted yesterday.
And then he showed up to Congress and said he had no idea anything was wrong.
What’s also interesting is how the testimony by Kahn is being headlined in regular media outlets. What’s the important thing that should lead off the reporting? Here’s a sampling:
FOX: Epstein accountant testifies he never saw 'any type of transaction' with Trump, Comer says
KBAX-KBFX: Epstein's accountant confirms no payments made to or from Trump
MSN: Epstein payout tied to Trump accuser revealed
Newsweek: Epstein Estate Paid Trump Settlement to Abuse Accuser: Accountant
ABC: Epstein's accountant says he didn't see any 'red flags' for abuse, trafficking
I’d be inclined to believe Trump decided to attack Iran as a distraction from the Epstein files, but at this point I wonder if he really needed to? There should have already been sufficient evidence to have brought Trump down by now. Certainly any Democratic president would already have been driven from office with accusations like the ones that have already surfaced.
And so it goes.
