The Trump
administration has granted preliminary approval for a cryptocurrency
venture backed by President Donald Trump’s family to operate a federally
chartered trust bank, over the protests of Democrats who decried the
decision as riddled with conflicts of interest.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the bank regulatory arm of the Treasury Department, said in a letter
on Friday that it was conditionally approving World Liberty Trust Co.’s
application for a trust bank charter. The company must still meet
additional requirements before it receives final approval, the regulator
said.
The decision stands to give new powers and federal credibility to a venture in which Trump
and his family retain a substantial financial interest. It’s also among
the most direct official actions that the administration has taken
involving the president’s private finances.
World Liberty Trust Co. President and Chairman Zach Witkoff
said the charter will allow the company to manage its USD1 stablecoin, a
crypto token whose value is pegged to $1, under the OCC’s watch.
“USD1
grew because institutions trust how it operates, and confidence at
enterprise scale deserves the backing of federal supervision,” Witkoff, the son of Trump’s special envoy, Steve Witkoff, said in a statement. “We welcome continuous scrutiny from Federal regulators for many years to come.”
While
Washington has been in knots over the steady drumbeat of news that
Trump-linked businesses are expanding during his second term, the World
Liberty application stood out to many.
Some
Democrats and ethics watchdogs argued that the bid was one of the
clearest examples of the conflicts of interest that administration
officials face as they weigh the wishes of Trump family-backed
companies. And they were quick to bash the OCC’s approval.
“This
is the most brazen act of self-dealing our financial system has ever
seen — and Congress cannot allow it to stand,” said Sen. Elizabeth Warren, the top Democrat on the Senate Banking Committee.
Warren and other Democrats unveiled legislation
on Friday that would prohibit regulators from approving banks that are
owned or controlled by the president or the president’s family, vice
president, members of Congress or other top government officials.
A
Democratic Senate aide said the Banking Committee would likely probe
the OCC’s approval of the World Liberty bank charter next year if
Democrats regain control of Congress.
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington CEO Donald Sherman called the OCC’s approval “the most egregious example to date of the President’s businesses profiting from his government job.”
“The
President continues to boost the crypto market at the expense of
everyday Americans who are wondering what happened to the money in their
own bank accounts,” he said.
World
Liberty, in advance of the approval, had rejected the conflict
allegations — saying Trump is not involved in managing the company and
that none of its leaders or employees work for the federal government.
The White House has similarly said Trump has no involvement in business deals that would implicate his official responsibilities.
Trump
and his family nevertheless retain a substantial financial stake in
World Liberty Financial. DT Marks DEFI LLC, an entity affiliated with
Trump and members of his family, owns about 38 percent of the holding
company that controls World Liberty Financial, according to the
company’s website. The entity and Trump family members also hold 22.5 billion of World Liberty’s governance tokens.
Trump
disclosed nearly $600 million in income from World Liberty token and
equity sales in 2025, a major piece of the $1.4 billion of
crypto-related earnings he raked in. He has said he does not manage his
financial interests, which are overseen by his children.
The
approval doesn’t allow World Liberty to open a traditional bank, but
rather a national trust bank — a limited-purpose institution that would
not make loans or accept federally insured deposits. It’s the latest in a
string of such approvals for crypto firms under Trump’s OCC. Others who have received similar green lights include Circle, Ripple and Coinbase.
The
charter still provides significant legal and financial advantages.
It’ll allow World Liberty to issue and redeem its USD1 stablecoin
directly, manage the reserves backing it and offer digital asset custody
services without relying on an intermediary. The company could also
operate across state lines more easily without having to answer to
individual state regulators.
Federal supervision could also bolster World Liberty’s credibility with customers and investors and help expand the use of USD1.
“This
is not World Liberty trying to become Chase or Bank of America. This is
World Liberty trying to become like Circle,” the crypto giant, said Austin Campbell, a crypto adviser and professor at New York University. The newly acquired charter, Campbell
added, “is a regulatory wrapper to be able to hold these things in the
way required under U.S. law to do business with both retail and the big
boys.”
The decision to approve World Liberty Trust Co. had put Comptroller Jonathan Gould,
a Trump appointee, in the extraordinary position of deciding whether to
grant federal banking privileges to a business tied to the president’s
family.
Gould
had rejected calls to pause the review or recuse himself. And he
declined a request by Democrats to share the full, unredacted
application submitted by World Liberty. “We process applications in a
fair and evenhanded manner,” he told lawmakers in February.
Stephen Lybarger,
the top OCC official overseeing bank chartering and a longtime career
official of the agency, wrote in the approval letter on Friday that the
agency followed “established policies and procedures” in evaluating
World Liberty’s application.
“The
Comptroller and staff acted consistently with their statutory duties
and ethical obligations with respect to the Application,” Lybarger
wrote. “Career OCC staff reviewed the application for consistency with
the statutory, regulatory, and policy requirements and factors for
approval of a de novo application.”
The
OCC declined to comment further. The agency consulted with career
government ethics officials as it evaluated the World Liberty
application, according to a person familiar with the process.
Justin
Sun was already one of the richest people in the world, having made his
fortune in the no-rules early phase of the crypto industry, when he
first met the three men from World Liberty Financial. It was October
2024, and the only thing Sun knew of the company they were hoping he
would invest in was that it was being launched by then-candidate Donald
Trump and his three sons.
Neither
Don Jr., Eric, and Barron nor anyone else with the Trump name was on
the video call that day. Instead, on the other side were World Liberty’s
three top executives: an internet-marketing hustler who had spent time
in jail on drug charges and been sued multiple times for fraud, a former
professional pickup artist, and the son of Donald Trump’s best friend.
Chase Herro, the internet marketer, was a wiry 41-year-old with sleeve
tattoos, perma-stubble, and a vocabulary rich in blue-collar slang. Zak
Folkman, the pickup artist, also 41, had both ears pierced and win!
tattooed on one biceps in a comic-book-style speech bubble. He and Herro
had previously launched a crypto platform that was hacked and drained
of money, prompting accusations from at least one large investor of
insider theft. The third co-founder was Zach Witkoff, the 33-year-old
son of Steve Witkoff, the real-estate mogul who now serves as President
Trump’s special envoy to the Middle East. Zach Witkoff had been arrested
for cocaine possession leaving a Miami nightclub in 2022 and generally
presented as an awkward rich kid (“If you could anthropomorphize a
squirrel,” as a former World Liberty adviser put it). “My dad got shot
at with the president the other day,” Witkoff said by way of
introduction on the call.
In This Issue
Sun,
who was raised in China by middle-class journalist parents and earned a
master’s degree at the University of Pennsylvania, built his fortune by
launching his own blockchain, Tron, which became popular in Asia as a
fast and cheap way to move U.S.-dollar stablecoins. Tron’s digital coin,
$TRX, with a market cap of some $31 billion, is the
eighth-most-valuable cryptocurrency in the world. According to Forbes,
Sun’s net worth is an estimated $8.5 billion, making him richer than
George Soros and not far behind Bill Ackman. (Sun suggests he’s worth
more than that; when Bloomberg estimated his wealth at $12.5 billion,
Sun sued.)
In
his ascendancy, Sun had not escaped the attention of the U.S.
government. In March 2023, the Securities and Exchange Commission under
the Biden administration charged him and his companies with fraud,
alleging market manipulation and the unregistered offer and sale of
securities. Sun was charged simultaneously with Lindsay Lohan, Jake
Paul, Akon, and Soulja Boy, who were accused of illegally hawking Tron’s
cryptocurrency without disclosing Sun paid them to do so. The SEC also
accused Sun of artificially inflating the price of $TRX by making
“hundreds of thousands” of essentially fake trades among his own
accounts — and of lying: “Sun materially misrepresented the truth about
the touting campaign to deceive investors,” according to the SEC. Later
that year, Tron made headlines for reportedly being used by terrorist
groups, including Hamas and Islamic Jihad, putting additional heat on
Sun, who had reportedly avoided traveling to the U.S. for years out of
fear he’d be arrested. (Tron later took measures to better police its
platform.)
Sun eating a $6.2 million banana bought at auction from the artist Maurizio Cattelan in 2024. “It’s still fresh.”
Photo: Peter Parks/AFP via Getty Images
Now,
on the eve of the presidential election, the three guys on the Zoom
were offering Sun an interesting investment opportunity that, should
Trump win a second term, might also conveniently help relieve this legal
pressure. Don Jr. and Eric Trump were all in on the project, the three
World Liberty founders said on the call. In fact, the Trump family, at
the time, owned 75 percent of the business. The Trumps’ passion for
World Liberty, the founders told Sun, came from being “debanked,” or
off-loaded as clients, by JPMorgan and Capital One in the wake of the
January 6 insurrection. They were committed to pursuing a crypto
alternative for their wealth — a way to control their own money through
uncensurable digital wallets. Trump would preside over a financial
revolution enabling regular citizens to bypass banks and invest their
assets freely across decentralized crypto platforms.
World
Liberty would build innovative projects that delivered on the new
administration’s ambitions. “They said they were the victims of those
centralized controls,” says Sun. “I believe in the vision of what was
presented.” Sun, who has a libertarian streak (he became an Ayn Rand fan
in graduate school), says he identified with fears of a “very big
centralized power that eventually will enslave everyone.” He liked the
pitch enough that he was willing to overlook the founders’ worrisome
backgrounds.
In
November 2024, Sun transferred $30 million to World Liberty and came
aboard as an adviser, receiving billions of yet-to-launch $WLFI coins —
the key token in the company’s future crypto ecosystem — in exchange. He
was immediately the biggest investor in the project. Sun’s involvement
also gave World Liberty a halo of safety in the eyes of many other
crypto investors. In the month before Sun invested, World Liberty had
brought in only $21 million from other investors, a fraction of its
target. After Sun’s involvement was made public, money poured in
(including another $15 million from Sun). World Liberty closed its
initial sale in January 2025, having raised $300 million.
Over
the next year or so, Sun would come to believe he’d made a colossal
mistake. World Liberty would disappoint his expectations and those of
many other investors: The decentralized crypto products it promised
would largely never materialize; the money investors put in would remain
mostly locked away from them; and the $WLFI cryptocurrency would crash,
leaving many token holders with huge losses while the president and his
partners made hundreds of millions in profits. Sun would be stripped of
his tokens entirely. “Today, the thing I regret the most is not only
that my money got stuck but that my name is on the project,” Sun says.
“I believe many other people also got harmed.” In April 2026, he filed a
lawsuit against World Liberty alleging fraud and breach of contract.
When we spoke in June via Zoom, it was late in the evening in Hong Kong,
where he lives. His background was a picture of the Golden Gate Bridge,
but when the screen faltered, I could see he was lying down, his head
on a pillow. Wearing a deep-blue crewneck T-shirt, he drank water from a
carafe as he walked me through his past and his time with World
Liberty. Our conversation took place under the shadow of defamation
claims World Liberty had recently made against Sun, and he seemed torn
between wanting to condemn the company’s actions and staying within the
guardrails his lawyers had set for him. But he couldn’t hide his outrage
at World Liberty — for making a mockery of the principles it was
purportedly founded on and for, in his eyes, essentially stealing his
money in full public view. “I never expected this to happen to me,” says
Sun. “This is the worst-case scenario.”
Sun’s
account, and those of others who invested in and worked for the
company, depict an enterprise that was partially inspired and de facto
run by Herro — a man whose career might be characterized as a high-speed
succession of shameless for-profit hustles. Sun and other investors
describe how World Liberty soaked up hundreds of millions in investments
based on the Trumps’ involvement, then sat on the money. Outside
investors, including Sun, always seemed to lose, while company insiders
always won. “I thought surely these people would not do what they did
with such a public profile attached,” says Sun. “Looking back, I was
wrong about that. Unfortunately, as alleged in the complaint, certain
operators leveraged the Trump brand to profit through fraud.”
The
president’s financial disclosures reveal that, in 2025, his ventures
brought in at least $2.2 billion with crypto accounting for more than
half of that total. The largest individual element of that historic
windfall — likely the best financial year of his life and the most
profitable ever for any president — was World Liberty, which put some
$800 million into Trump’s pocket. While the Trumps were hands off on
day-to-day matters — and Sun is careful to say his issues are not with
the Trumps directly — they were the largest owners of the company and
certainly the ones who decided its shape. “No president I can think of
has ever exploited the office this way for their own personal monetary
gain,” says Don Fox, who served as general counsel and then acting
director of the Office of Government Ethics under George W. Bush and
Barack Obama. “In the post-Watergate era, nobody’s gotten wealthy off
the presidency, certainly not fabulously wealthy.” Trump has also used
his office to protect his investment, signing an executive order
essentially instructing the SEC to go easy on crypto as soon as he was
inaugurated and while World Liberty was still raising money, which, Fox
adds, “is a criminal offense” for any executive-branch official except
the president and the vice-president.
Trump
didn’t start out a crypto booster. In 2019, he said he was “not a fan
of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, which are not money.” Trump
argued they “can facilitate unlawful behavior, including drug trade and
other illegal activity.” Out of office, though, he seems to have been
awakened to what crypto could do for him: It was popular with young men,
a key part of his base, and the industry became an enthusiastic source
of campaign contributions. He seems, too, to have recognized that it
could make him much richer than he already was.
The Trump family teamed up with former pickup artist Zak Folkman,
left, and self-described “dirtbag” Chase Herro to create crypto company
World Liberty Financial prior to the 2024 election.
Photo: Adam Gray/Bloomberg via Getty Images
Trump’s
sudden interest in crypto can be traced back to a seemingly
serendipitous meeting with Chase Herro in 2023. As Herro tells the
story, he bumped into Zach Witkoff that summer at the Witkoffs’ golf
resort, the Shell Bay Club, near Miami, and Zach offered to drive him
around the course. “Literally, on the golf cart, we just started
shooting the shit,” Herro later told Fortune. They became fast
friends. Zach introduced Herro to his father, Steve, and the elder
Witkoff brokered a meeting between Herro and Trump.
Sitting
with Trump, then in exile at Mar-a-Lago, Herro needed to prove that
there was real money in crypto — and that he, seemingly a nobody, was
actually absurdly rich. Herro pulled out his phone and moved some $100
million in crypto coins from one wallet to another. Trump was sold.
“That turned the lights on,” says a former World Liberty adviser who has
known Herro for several years. (The White House had no comment; a
spokesperson for World Liberty said this “story is inaccurate” but did
not specify why.) From there, Trump began courting the crypto vote and
receiving generous contributions from the industry. He declared he would
make the U.S. “the crypto capital of the planet” and branded himself
the future “crypto president.” He officially launched World Liberty
shortly before the election and his own $TRUMP meme coin (an entirely
separate crypto venture) in January 2025, days prior to his
inauguration. Says the former adviser, “Chase was very proud: ‘Who would
have thought? Dirtbag like me.’”
Herro,
roughly five-foot-ten with a slender build that he has described as the
body of a 12-year-old synchronized swimmer, grew up in a suburb of
Madison, Wisconsin. His family was “very poor,” he said on a podcast in
early 2020: “I think when you live in poverty, you assume everybody’s
poor.” He sold marijuana and was arrested at least four times before his
18th birthday on charges including theft — for a scheme in which he was
caught on-camera cashing his stepfather’s checks — and drug possession.
Herro’s mother once called the police on him for domestic abuse.
Shortly after high school, following a drug-related arrest, Herro cut
off his ankle monitor and fled to California, according to a story he’s
told to friends and on podcasts.
When he got to California in the mid-aughts, Herro, who pronounces (and often spells) his name Hero, reinvented
his origins. He described his mother as an ultrawealthy cheese-factory
magnate and his father as a Mafia member who had been murdered in front
of him, according to former roommates. (On podcasts years later, Herro
said that his father had died of a heart attack and was found alone in
his home and that he’d bought his mom a house, told her to “quit her
job, and let her retire.”“My parents have no money,” he said on a
separate podcast.) He worked at an ampm gas station in San Diego and
then in construction, but he bragged about having a second home and a
fancy-car collection. “None of that existed,” says a former friend. “He
was like, ‘You just gotta talk about it like it’s already here.’”
A
former roommate says even two decades ago he clocked Herro as a
sociopath. “Literally everything is a lie,” says the former roommate.
“The watches he’s wearing, the sunglasses — fake. He wouldn’t say he
went to McDonald’s; he’d say, ‘I ate at Ruth’s Chris.’” (That was not
the only time someone made this assessment about Herro. “If someone
calls me a sociopath, I kind of, like, look over and I’m like, ‘Thanks, I
think?’” Herro said on a podcast in 2020. “If you’re going to invest
money in a day trader or investor, I want them to be a sociopath.”)
Herro’s
fake-it-till-you-make-it strategy began to bear fruit when he
discovered the then-hot world of affiliate marketing. He would create
false dating profiles, pretending to be a single woman, and post them on
sites like Backpage or Craigslist; when someone expressed interest in
meeting in person, Herro would ask them to first sign up for a
background check, enrolling them in a $40-a-month service from which he
got a commission, according to the former roommate. “I remember going to
his house and he’d have, like, 20 laptops out just running these bots
that would post these things,” says this person. Herro sold hair-loss
remedies, colon cleansers, and tactical flashlights. In 2010, after
Herro launched a marijuana dispensary called Healthy Wealthy and Wise, a
man who believed he’d invested $170,000 in the venture sued him for
fraud, claiming the corporation never existed and Herro had deposited
the funds into his personal account. (The plaintiff was awarded a
default judgment with interest.) Soon, a website appeared detailing
complaints against Herro under the domain name ChaseHeroScam.com. “Chase
just doesn’t care who he has to step on or who he has to jump over; it
was like, ‘I want to be rich,’” says the former friend. “That was it.
Not even famous; just rich.”
Herro
moved to a different part of San Diego County and gave his old friends a
tour of his new home. “Hidden inside fake books were just stacks of
cash,” says another former friend. Herro also displayed a Desert Eagle
pistol — one of the largest-caliber handguns sold in the U.S. — on his
nightstand. On YouTube, Herro posted videos of a warehouse full of dirt
bikes and mini go-carts, paintball guns, and other toys; friends
remember photos in which he was unloading a moving truck filled with
fine art. He bought a 34-foot boat he named Clickbait.
In
2019, the entrepreneur Sam Bakhtiar asked Herro on a podcast to opine
on fraud. “At least they’re trying to do something in life. It’s fucked
up, but, like, I’ll give credit to a bank robber versus someone who sits
on a fucking TV and eats potato chips all day,” he said. “Granted, is
their execution wrong? Yeah, probably. But I’m not God; I’m not here to
judge.”
Herro
met Zak Folkman in an online “mastermind” group, where they shared tips
about how to make a lot of money quickly. Folkman was a co-founder of a
website called Date Hotter Girls. They quickly became business
partners. “He’s a Chad,” the former World Liberty adviser says of
Folkman.
Herro
and Folkman launched several online communities, including one they
called the Watchers, promising investment advice and selling
subscriptions for thousands of dollars a year to access their network — a
kind of knockoff of Tai Lopez. In 2021 at a meeting in Miami, Herro
pitched his supporters on the promise of a decentralized-finance, or
DeFi, crypto project. “He was almost crying as he told us how incredible
it was that he put 90 percent of his net worth into DeFi and it was the
most amazing financial thing he’d ever discovered,” says a member of
the group. “He seemed like a genuine evangelist and very passionate
about it.”
A
year later, the project was worthless, but Herro showed no signs of
having lost nearly all of his assets. By then, he had a fleet of about a
dozen luxury vehicles, all of them white, with Montana plates,
exploiting a loophole that allowed him to avoid paying taxes on the
cars. Taxes overall were now such an issue for Herro that around 2021 he
moved to Puerto Rico — claiming on Facebook he lived at the Ritz there —
for half (plus a day) of each year, taking advantage of the popular tax
haven. “It sucks; we call it just putting in time. It almost feels like
going to jail,” he told a friend. “I just do it because it saves me so
much money.”
When
Herro met Zach Witkoff at the golf course, it probably wasn’t a
coincidence. “I don’t think anything is incidental with Chase,” says the
former World Liberty adviser. “It’s been crazy to watch him. It’s like
the same exact thing he’s been doing for years; he’s just in different
rooms with different, more powerful people,” says the former roommate.
“My friends and I were just waiting for the day that Chase ends up in
handcuffs. But over the years, it’s like, Holy shit — he’s doing what now? He’s in the White House? I was like, Wow, the scam artist teamed up with the biggest con man.” Says the second former friend, “It’s unbelievable this guy scammed his way to the top.”
Herro’s
credentials as a crypto entrepreneur began and ended with a project he
launched in April 2024, just a few months before World Liberty was
formed. Called Dough Finance, it was supposed to be a DeFi blockchain
platform from which Herro promised “guaranteed” profits through a
process he called “looping,” according to an investor named Jonny Lopez.
This involved repeatedly borrowing against crypto holdings and using
the borrowed funds to buy more.
Herro’s
business partner was Folkman, who got a degree from New York Law School
in 2010, around the time he co-founded Date Hotter Girls under the
pseudonym Zack Bauer. (On the site, he sold an e-book — still available
in a package priced at $97 — that includes “a story about Zack
‘motorboating’ a girl at a dive bar” and instructions on how to “move
situations toward sex ridiculously fast,” according to a promotional
page.)
That
spring and summer, Herro raised money from investors, including Lopez,
who put in $1 million. “Bro I never do shit,” Herro texted Lopez,
according to evidence later filed in court. “All handshakes and go.”
Herro indicated to Lopez that Dough had “over $3 billion” in liquidity:
“What you think I built some stupid toy lol.”
But days after Lopez had completed his investment, his money disappeared. Dough had been hacked; the money was gone.
Sun in Dubai with Zach Witkoff and Eric Trump in 2025 before the big breakup.
Photo: Giuseppe Cacace/AFP via Getty Images
Lopez
and other investors were incredulous — and blamed Herro. According to a
lawsuit filed by Lopez in 2025 accusing Herro of negligent
misrepresentation and fraud, Herro “altered or manipulated Dough
Finance’s code” and staged a fake governance vote as part of a plan to
steal investors’ money. (Folkman is not named in the lawsuit.) “As it
turns out: each and every promise and representation that Chase made to
Jonny was a complete lie — a ruse by Chase to pump the liquidity on
Dough Finance’s platform so that Chase could take it for himself,” Lopez
alleged in the suit. When a process server attempted to serve him with
the lawsuit, Herro ran. (In July 2026, Herro urged the court to dismiss
the case, arguing that Dough really had been hacked.)
Suspicions
around the Dough hack were rampant when Trump partnered with Herro and
Folkman on World Liberty two months later. Trump officially announced
World Liberty in a livestream in September 2024, and the company
released a “Gold Paper” (a spin on the white papers that crypto projects
typically publish) emblazoned with his portrait over a graphic of a
golden paint splotch. In the paper, World Liberty said its mission was
“to democratize finance” — a rip-off of trading app Robinhood’s slogan.
What World Liberty seemed to promise was unprecedented in the U.S.: a
government-blessed crypto project that would offer an alternative not
just to crypto platforms like Coinbase or Circle but to banks
themselves. Indeed, World Liberty, “inspired by the vision of Donald J.
Trump,” proposed a “new strategy” that would “help to safeguard the US
Dollar’s future as the global reserve currency,” the Gold Paper read,
“without compromising on freedom.”
The
Gold Paper was light on specifics about what World Liberty actually
planned to do. Those in charge did not seem to know either. Around the
time of the launch, Steve Witkoff, who was then listed as a co-founder
of World Liberty along with his two sons, asked the venture capitalist
Nic Carter to meet him at Pura Vida, the smoothie-and-sandwich chain, in
Sunset Harbour in Miami. He wanted Carter to come onboard as an adviser
but could not explain concepts fundamental to the business. “He didn’t
know what crypto or DeFi was. He didn’t know what the pitch was,”
recalls Carter. “I’m like, Oh, okay, so there’s no product. They’re just doing a token.”
The biggest giveaway was when Witkoff explained that Trump had become
interested in the crypto project because “Barron was getting active with
meme coins” — but pronounced it “me-me” coins.
What
was important, Witkoff explained, was that they launch World Liberty
before Trump was elected president again. “They needed Trump to be
involved for launch as a private citizen,” says Carter. “They had to
rush it out.” Carter, who voted for Trump in the election, declined the
adviser position and warned that World Liberty risked damaging the
candidate at the polls, given its credibility issues. That’s when
Witkoff’s tone changed. “Then he, like, flips to try to bully me,” says
Carter. “‘You don’t want to be on the big guy’s bad side.’” (World
Liberty describes this characterization of the conversation as
“inaccurate” and says the company “never formally offered Mr. Carter any
such role.”)
In
those early days, World Liberty was desperate not just for big-name
advisers to burnish its reputation but for start-up capital. It had set
an initial fundraising goal of $289 million. Despite their affiliation
with the likely next president, Herro and Folkman — World Liberty’s only
executive officers and directors on initial securities filings —
struggled to attract investors. By the end of October 2024, World
Liberty had slashed its investment target by 90 percent to $30 million.
Morten Christensen, a Dutch crypto investor living in Mexico, had been
considering investing in World Liberty but decided the tepid interest
from others was a bad sign. “For me, that was a red flag — Oh, never mind, they’re never going to raise enough,”
he says. “In crypto, if it’s not popular, it’s not going to be
popular.” Among investors, there were almost endless reasons to stay
away. “Nothing about the project gave a semblance of legitimacy unless
you’re delusional enough to see a Trump cash grab as legit,” says one
longtime crypto investor who chose not to put in money. Elliot Omanson, a
three-time Trump voter and crypto investor with a financial advisory
firm in Kansas, says he was against World Liberty from the get-go. “Why
would you want to create a vehicle that has all the appearances of
corruption when you’re supposedly going in to fight the deep state and
drain the swamp?” he says. “I hate crony capitalism more than I hate
socialism or communism because it’s a corruption of my belief system.”
Even the crypto venture fund Polychain Capital, which had brokered the
introduction to Sun, ultimately declined to invest. “They weren’t
raising any money for months. And it becomes a bit embarrassing for the
Trump crew if literally the president, or the soon-to-be president at
that point, isn’t able to raise any cash,” says the former World Liberty
adviser.
World
Liberty’s founders hoped Sun could change that. Sun — specifically his
wealth — had become an object of Herro’s fascination. On Logan Paul’s
podcast in early 2021, Herro was asked if he had “fuck-you money.” He
hesitated, recalling seeing Sun bid at an NFT auction. “I just watched
that Justin Sun guy spend $69 million on the Beeple piece,” Herro
answered. “Do you know what that made me feel like?” (Sun himself, it
turned out, was narrowly outbid at the end of the auction.)
Sun
also had a reputation as a hustler. In creating the Tron blockchain, he
simply copy-and-pasted code, without credit, from Ethereum, one of the
original chains. Tron, launched in 2017, was still a massive hit. A year
later, Sun and his company expanded their empire, buying BitTorrent,
the site best known as a venue for sharing pirated movies and games, for
$140 million in cash. In 2019, he won a lunch with Warren Buffett in a
charity auction with a bid of $4.6 million. Soon, Sun was collecting
works by Picasso and Warhol, which will eventually be displayed at a
museum he is building in Hong Kong (tentative name: Justin Sun Museum).
In 2021, he spent $28 million to secure a ticket to space on a Blue
Origin rocket. That same year, he became Grenada’s ambassador to the
World Trade Organization, after which he started using the title “His
Excellency” on social media and at public appearances. (He continues to
go by “H.E. Justin Sun” despite the fact that his diplomatic status was
revoked in 2023.) Last year, Tron went public on the nasdaq, though it
took a bit of a shortcut, bypassing an IPO by merging with an obscure,
but publicly traded, company that makes souvenirs sold at Disney and
other theme parks. And while Sun and his companies have had persistent
legal controversies (and are notably litigious), he also holds the rare
distinction of being one of the few original crypto founders who have
never been to prison.
Staying
out of prison was likely on the mind of at least a few investors in
World Liberty. Making a large investment in the project was widely seen
as a play to curry favor with Trump. The project was upfront about the
fact that 75 percent of net revenues would go to the president’s company
DT Marks DEFI LLC (of which Trump owns 70 percent and family members
own the rest). It was as though World Liberty had opened up a way to
give money directly to Trump. Even in the profiteering world of crypto,
an arrangement so lopsided, so nakedly self-dealing, was remarkable.
Just
five days before his initial investment of $30 million in World
Liberty, Sun bought a banana duct-taped to a wall — a conceptual artwork
by Maurizio Cattelan — for $6.2 million in a Sotheby’s auction. Sun
says he came across the work at random in the Sotheby’s catalogue and
was surprised by the attention he received afterward. “I bought that
just because I feel this art is kinda cool,” he says. “I bought other
art pieces much more expensive than this banana before, but none of
those became famous at all.” A few days later, after Sotheby’s advised
him to throw the banana away, he ate it. “Why not? It’s still fresh,” he
says. “Eating a banana is very common behavior.”
Sun’s
investment was big news in the financial press. CNBC’s headline was
“Banana Auction Billionaire Invests in Trump’s Crypto Venture”;
Bloomberg went with “Trump’s Crypto Project Was a Bust Till Justin Sun
Stepped In.” Sun put in the additional $15 million after the heady round
of press. By March 2025, World Liberty had raised $550 million.
Sun in space aboard Blue Origin’s New Shepard suborbital vehicle in 2025.
Photo: JustinSun Tron/YouTube
As
with many crypto projects, there were two kinds of stakeholders in
World Liberty. Insiders had actual equity shares in the holding company.
They are owners in the traditional sense, and operating profits flow to
them. In January 2025, World Liberty sold a large equity stake in the
company for $500 million to a firm associated with the United Arab
Emirates’“spy sheikh,” Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan, days ahead of
Trump’s inauguration. Following the sale, the Trumps retained 38
percent ownership of World Liberty. (Herro and Folkman’s company and an
entity owned by the Witkoffs held smaller stakes.)
Outside
investors, including Sun, received $WLFI crypto tokens. Their hope was
that World Liberty’s projects and activities would raise the value of
those tokens on crypto markets — that if World Liberty built a thriving
crypto platform (with, for instance, innovative and potentially
lucrative options for lending and borrowing $WLFI), that would create
public demand, which, in turn, would drive up the price. But those links
can be tenuous in crypto. $WLFI holders don’t own equity in the company
or have a claim on profits — rather, they own the right to vote on some
decisions for the project. ($WLFI is what is known as a governance
token.) In practice, though, governance often amounts to no power at
all.
World
Liberty told investors that the tokens’“sole utility” was voting rights
— not trading. In a statement, the World Liberty spokesperson said,
“$WLFI was sold as a governance token without transfer rights initially.
And those who purchased $WLFI governance tokens understood there was
never any expectation of profit from the holding of $WLFI.” But to Sun
and other investors, it seemed like legalese to avoid breaking
securities laws. “First of all, if it’s a crypto token, it’s going to be
traded on chain whether they want it or not,” says Christensen, who
decided to buy the World Liberty token in the first round after Sun came
onboard. “It would make no sense for members of the public to pay any
money for the tokens,” Sun wrote in his lawsuit, “if the tokens offered
no economic upside.”
It
wasn’t long before several of the outside advisers to the project — a
larger group of a dozen or so that, in addition to Sun, included a
venture capitalist from Polychain, a pseudonymous cybersecurity
specialist, and the head of a firm called the Crypto Lawyers — started
to have concerns. The advisers had been in a Telegram group chat, but
Folkman abruptly shut it down in late 2024, before they’d been able to
offer their expertise to World Liberty. “They never asked for any of our
advice,” says one former adviser.
Months
went by, and the “financial revolution” World Liberty promised never
materialized. Sun says he gave the World Liberty team ideas for products
it could build, but no one followed through on any of them. “I started
to notice what I believed to be red flags,” Sun says now. “They seemed
to be interested only in raising money, not in developing actual
products.”
World
Liberty did continue to raise money. In doing so, the company’s
co-founders often dangled the possibility of a partnership, a deal, or a
good word with the “big guy” to entice investors to put money in. It
wasn’t exactly a quid pro quo. “More they were going out saying, ‘If you
invest $11 million in us, we’ll invest $1 million back in your thing,’”
says the former adviser.
In
March 2025, World Liberty announced plans for its first real product: a
stablecoin to be known as USD1. This dovetailed with the genius Act,
soon to be passed by Congress, which would bring stablecoins into the
country’s regulated financial system. Each issued USD1 coin — a crypto
token designed to always be worth exactly $1 — would be backed by a real
dollar held by World Liberty. In other words, minting 100 million USD1
coins required $100 million in funds backing the coins. The real dollars
would be invested in U.S. T-bills — short-term-debt notes from the
federal government that currently pay between 3.5 and 4 percent
interest. As of July 2026, there were 4.2 billion outstanding USD1
coins, penciling out to roughly $150 million in annual interest income.
That money is almost pure profit.
Sun heading to the White House in 2025.
Photo: Jason Andrew/The New York Times/Redux
The
stablecoin business was a huge boon for insiders, creating a permanent
dividend for the Trumps, the Witkoffs, Herro, and Folkman (and perhaps
the Emiratis, though the terms of their ownership aren’t totally clear).
But the stablecoin, as World Liberty elected to build it, was unlikely
to meaningfully increase the value of the $WLFI token. Outside investors
were left watching in frustration.
World
Liberty’s big bet on a stablecoin business made it clear to savvier
$WLFI holders that there was no longer much incentive for the company to
develop or launch other products, including ones that might profit
regular $WLFI holders. “What’s the fucking point? Kick the can down the
road. They’re making money,” says the former World Liberty adviser.
Perhaps, the adviser tells me, a future Democratic administration would
put an end to the scheme and a Democratic Congress would subpoena the
players, but he doesn’t think that scenario is weighing heavily on the
minds of the $WLFI executives. “They don’t care,” he says. “It doesn’t
matter because they’ve had two-to-three years of making fat cash off the
stablecoin treasury.” Meanwhile, the company still hadn’t released any
$WLFI tokens, which meant the outside investors such as Sun who held
them were still completely locked up.
As
2025 wore on, Sun began to feel increasingly used by World Liberty,
which was continually pushing him to put in more money. World Liberty
executives “engaged in a sustained and escalating campaign to pressure
Mr. Sun into committing hundreds of millions of dollars to mint USD1,”
his lawsuit later alleged. They approached him at industry conferences
and events, badgering him to commit $200 million to the treasury backing
USD1, as well as to take an equity stake in World Liberty’s holding
company. Sun said “no.”“There’s never enough,” says a person familiar
with the situation. “How are you going to spend all the money you raise?
This company keeps raising funds without building.”
At
the bitcoin conference in Las Vegas in May 2025, Zach Witkoff went to a
celebratory dinner with Herro, Folkman, and other $WLFI associates at
Wing Lei, a Michelin-starred Chinese restaurant at the Wynn.
While
Witkoff talked about his dad and his relationship with Trump — “The
president loves me” — Herro and Folkman talked business, according to a
veteran of the U.S. crypto industry who was in attendance. Herro pitched
the group on a plan that he said would make World Liberty, and the
dinner guests, “so much money,” says this person, who remembers being
unimpressed by the idea. “Chase, you just get an awful feeling from this
guy right from the beginning that this guy is out there to scheme and
pull a fast one,” the person says. “I wouldn’t trust him with a penny.”
Though
it was never formally announced by the company, sometime around the
summer of 2025, Witkoff was elevated to CEO of World Liberty. Before
then, his most notable credentials, aside from jobs at his family’s
firms, were speaking at the 2024 Republican National Convention and
naming his firstborn son Don James Witkoff after the president. “I can’t
think of a reason why he would be the CEO of a multimillion-dollar
business,” says the former adviser, who adds that he believes Herro was
the de facto leader. “When it comes just to raw intelligence, Chase has
him beat hands down.” (“Zach Witkoff is the CEO, both in name and in
reality,” said World Liberty’s spokesperson.)
Last
august, World Liberty announced that the $WLFI token would begin
trading on the open market on September 1, 2025 — the crypto equivalent
of an IPO. Investors would finally be able to turn their tokens into
real money. A few days before the debut, Sun posted photos of himself
with Eric Trump in Hong Kong, both smiling and giving thumbs-up.
Sun with Eric Trump in 2025, shortly before $WLFI began trading publicly.
Photo: Justin Sun/Instagram
But
in an unexpected move, World Liberty released only 20 percent of each
investor’s tokens. “Great, now we can sell some, but what about the
rest?” says Christensen, who has become an unofficial spokesman for
thousands of disgruntled $WLFI investors. When trading opened, many
worried holders rushed to sell what they could. After a quick initial
spike, $WLFI’s price went into free fall. By the end of the day, $WLFI
was down 40 percent. Sun claims he didn’t sell any of his tokens, but
that he moved 56 million of them — about one percent of the 4 billion he
owned overall — into other crypto wallets after the price fell,
“meaning the transfer could not have been the cause of the decline.”
Three
days later, Sun says he woke up to find he was locked out of his entire
World Liberty account. Even the 20 percent share that he should have
been able to trade was gone, he alleges in his lawsuit. While his World
Liberty tokens had been worth as much as $1 billion on paper, it was no
longer clear that they were his. “My account got frozen completely,” he
says. “I think I was in shock for a while. After all the trust and
support I gave them, I couldn’t understand what happened.” It looked to
Sun — who’d lost money in many a failed, hacked, or corrupt crypto
project, from Mt. Gox to FTX — like a classic rug pull, cryptospeak for a
scheme in which founders run off with their investors’ funds. “I was
like, This is losing control, and I lost all confidence in the project.”
Sun
says he soon discovered that World Liberty had powers he was unaware of
and a level of control that is unusual for decentralized blockchain
projects. On August 24, eight days before trading went live, the company
had pushed through a change in its “smart contract” — the algorithm
that automatically executes token transactions — giving World Liberty
the power to freeze, and effectively seize, any investor’s tokens
without warning. “In the dark of night, the company thus created a
‘blacklisting’ function that it could wield at will,” Sun would later
say in his lawsuit. Or as he put it in a post on X, “This is a trap door
marketed as an open door.”
Sun
concluded that not only did World Liberty have no intention of
returning his coins, it also planned to scapegoat him for its disastrous
debut and, worse yet, try to get him in legal trouble with the Trump
administration. World Liberty said in a post on X that a certain unnamed
user — which many, including Sun, assumed was him — was “suspected of
misappropriation of other holders’ funds.” (A representative for Sun
says, “Justin would never have had the practical ability to
misappropriate anyone’s funds, since he was just an investor and
adviser, and was never in a position to access user funds.”) A few weeks
later, around September 24, according to Sun’s lawsuit, Herro gave Sun a
choice: He could publicly agree for World Liberty to “burn” (that is,
destroy) his $WLFI, relinquishing his right to what was then $776
million in tokens, or World Liberty’s leadership team would call a vote
among all token holders on whether to forcibly burn Sun’s holdings.
Either way, Sun would never get his tokens back. Herro allegedly amped
the pressure up further, threatening to report Sun to U.S. criminal
authorities, claiming there were problems with the compliance documents
he submitted when he first invested, according to Sun’s lawsuit, where
he describes this as “extortion.”“As the claim alleges, there were
repeated occasions where World Liberty, through Chase Herro, threatened
to burn my tokens,” Sun says. “It was definitely not a pleasant
experience.”
Even
then, Sun held out hope he could patch things up without going to
court. After all, he still thought highly of President Trump, who had
loomed large in his life since childhood, when he’d learned English in
part by watching episodes of The Apprentice in China.
But
by early February 2026, many advisers to the company — minus those who
had taken official positions at World Liberty — had distanced themselves
from it. “I’m not aware of anybody who talks to them anymore,” says the
former adviser, “after various dealings or misdealings that have
occurred.” In getting involved, he had believed his expertise would help
protect investors’ money. But he and other advisers were concluding
that continuing to support World Liberty was a reputational liability.
“I know for a fact a lot of other people had similar questions in their
head: How much do I really want to be associated here and for how long?”
World
Liberty had also wiped its team members off the “About” page of its
website, erasing the stack of a dozen (mostly smiling) headshots —
including the four Trump men, three Witkoffs, Herro, Folkman, and three
other executives. Sun took the move as a tacit admission of guilt. “I
think they know they are doing something wrong,” says Sun. “I think they
want to hide behind names — either Trump’s name or my name.”
The
Trumps, though, continued hawking their cryptocurrency as though
nothing were amiss. Barron Trump, who, alongside his half-brothers, had
initially been listed as one of World Liberty’s top team members (his
official title: Web3 ambassador) but who had been silent on the project
for months, piped up on X in late January to announce that World
Liberty’s stablecoin had surpassed $4 billion in market value. “This is
just the start,” he added. A few weeks later, in February, the two elder
sons hosted a confab at Mar-a-Lago billed as the first World Liberty
Forum, attended by a roster of A-list names including Nicki Minaj,
Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon, and fifa president Gianni Infantino.
The pool was decorated with a giant version of World Liberty’s
golden-eagle logo. Also on display were the many ways the Trumps were
making money off their crypto enterprise: The family presented plans to
finance the Trump Organization’s new hotel in the Maldives, featuring
yachtlike floating villas, using World Liberty’s stablecoin. It was a
“magical day,” Eric Trump told the New York Post.
Sun
did not attend the conference but was in the process of finalizing his
own deal with the Trump administration that would improve his fortunes
in other ways. On March 5, the SEC announced a settlement of the case
against Sun — the one involving Lindsay Lohan and other celebrity crypto
promoters — begun almost three years earlier. The deal was very
favorable for Sun. One of his companies, a lesser-known subsidiary
called Rainberry, which operates BitTorrent, had to pay a fine of $10
million. It was, in Sun’s terms, less than two bananas. As part of the
settlement, neither Sun nor any of his companies admitted or denied any
wrongdoing; all the claims against Tron, and Sun personally, were
dropped. Sun’s team has emphatically rejected the notion that his World
Liberty investment greased the gears in Washington for the dismissal of
his case, suggesting the timing was coincidental. But no one could argue
that the investment had hurt Sun’s legal prospects.
For
the Trumps, World Liberty continued to pay off on a historic scale. In
April, CoinDesk reported that World Liberty had taken 5 billion $WLFI
tokens from its treasury and used them as collateral to borrow $75
million in stablecoins. The company then sent those stablecoins to a
Coinbase account, through which it could easily sell them on the open
market. The maneuver appeared to give the World Liberty team an
additional way to cash out — this time on tokens that were still
technically frozen — not available to average $WLFI holders.
Similarly,
Trump’s financial disclosure shows nine World Liberty transactions that
look different from the others. These entries are labeled as sales of
cryptocurrency-wallet “keys,” which the former World Liberty adviser
says likely means the Trumps sold wallets containing frozen $WLFI
tokens. The practice is not uncommon in the industry (the buyer acquires
the tokens at a discount and intends to flip them for a profit in the
future, after they are unlocked), but it was also not a viable option
for most $WLFI holders, whose locked tokens weren’t even always visible
in their own wallets (and who would probably have had to take a much
steeper markdown than Trump). Together, these transactions represent
nearly $291 million in income for the president.
Last
summer, World Liberty made a deal with a company, Alt5 Sigma, that has
funneled another $500 million to the Trumps. World Liberty took a
controlling stake in the company, while Alt5 Sigma bought $1.5 billion
worth of $WLFI tokens. But as the token price has crashed, Alt5 Sigma
has lost more than 90 percent of its stock-market value, changed its
name, and entered talks to sell its underlying business for as little as
$15 million.
As
$WLFI investors watched the token price continue to sink — down 80
percent at this point — they waited for news. “In my mind, the remaining
tokens that are locked are worth zero,” says Christensen.
On
April 15, World Liberty announced a proposal: The other 80 percent of
investors’ $WLFI holdings would be unlocked and made available to them
on an extended two-phase schedule, the first batch in 2028 and the
second batch over the subsequent two years — meaning some coins would
still be locked up after Trump is out of office. If the value of $WLFI
was contingent upon Trump wielding presidential powers, as many believed
it was, the timeline suggested a sizable share of the tokens could be
worthless by the time investors got them back. Because World Liberty
tokens carry governance rights, the proposal would be subject to a vote.
But investors who voted against the proposal would “remain locked
indefinitely,” the company announced. “The vote was kind of like a
hostage situation,” says Christensen. “It was a Godfather-type scenario, gun to the head. ‘Here’s an offer you can’t refuse.’”
That’s
when Sun says he made up his mind to file the suit against World
Liberty accusing the company of fraud and breach of contract. He did so
on April 21. The lawsuit was “a last resort to protect my rights and, I
believe, the rights of other token holders,” says Sun. Not that he could
have voted anyway; by seizing his tokens, World Liberty had revoked his
voting rights. “It wasn’t just that my money would go to zero, but I
felt like people were using my reputation basically to harm other
investors without even having their name exposed to the public,” says
Sun. “In my opinion, if World Liberty can do this to me — a billionaire
who can afford to fight back — they can do it to anyone.”
In
the world of crypto, Sun’s fight against World Liberty was a kind of
joke — an occasion for Schadenfreude for all those who had warned their
peers to stay away. “Anyone I know that got involved with the project
just did it because they knew Trump was enough of a crook to not let
this fail,” says the longtime crypto investor who did not invest. “That
anybody could be surprised by what has happened is the only shocking
part.”
World
Liberty itself tried to brush off Sun’s claims. “The only thing more
ridiculous than this lawsuit is spending $6 million on a banana
duct-taped to a wall,” Eric Trump posted on X the day after Sun filed
his complaint. “We are incredibly proud of the @worldlibertyfi team.”
Zach Witkoff expressed optimism that the case would quickly be thrown
out, calling it “a desperate attempt to deflect attention from Sun’s own
misconduct.” (The commenters did not exactly agree. “You don’t
blacklist wallets cause you feel like it motherfuckers,” reads one of
the most popular replies.) The same day Witkoff made his post, the
body-cam footage of his Miami arrest four years earlier suddenly
appeared online. (Those charges were dropped.)
It
was true that Sun has a reputation in the crypto world for being a
little shady, as some of his milder critics put it. And many in that
industry dismiss the claims as a pot-versus-kettle situation. “It’s
scammers scamming scammers,” more than one crypto investor told me. The
former World Liberty adviser said the scenario reminded him of the meme
in which two Spider-Mans point at each other.
But
the lawsuit is not just about the money, Sun insists. In the scheme of
his ten-to-11-figure wealth, the $45 million Sun put into World Liberty
is equivalent to what your average millionaire might spend on a modest
vacation. And Sun is no stranger to the risks involved with venture
capital or angel investing. The decision to sue, he says, was about the
principle and his reputation more than anything else. “Once I think I
know that something goes wrong, I need to tell people what happened
before more people get impacted,” says Sun. “I think it’s more about my
moral obligation. I felt I need to just call it out.” For him, calling
it out meant posting on X just before he sued: “I denounce the ongoing
token scandals by the bad actors at $WLFI.”
Privately,
other major World Liberty holders took Sun’s side, though they were
afraid to say so publicly. To them, the promise of World Liberty had
been a bait and switch. What had initially appeared as an
America-approved decentralized cryptocurrency with strong profit
potential was in fact what Wall Street calls a roach motel — an
investment where money goes in but never comes out. “Justin is more
credible,” says the former World Liberty adviser. After all, this person
had experienced many of the same issues with his tokens as Sun. “The
team and advisers are locked up completely,” he says. “That is a
unilateral modification that was not contemplated or agreed upon.”
In
his lawsuit, Sun does not name Trump or his sons — other than to say he
remains an “ardent supporter of President Trump and the Trump family” —
but the decision to sue is still politically dangerous for him. The
Trump administration wields power over whether to prosecute or pardon
him. Sun seems willing to make that gamble. “I know a lot of people
close to Justin have told him, ‘Don’t do this,’” says a person in
Washington who has advised Tron. Trump would take World Liberty’s side
in the fight, they warned. But Sun wasn’t moved. “This is not a
political issue,” Sun told this person. “These guys are like young punk
criminals. This kind of stuff is what gives the industry a bad name. You
gotta stand up for what’s right, no matter what.”
One
early crypto executive, who received his own pardon from Trump, advised
me to take anything Sun says “with an enormous grain of salt.” But, he
added, “he’s putting his whole shtick at enormous risk by breaking with
Trump.”
On
May 4, a couple of weeks after Sun filed his suit, World Liberty sued
him for defamation. Represented by the law firm Clare Locke, which
successfully sued Fox News over its “big lie” coverage following the
2020 election, World Liberty tells a different version of events. Though
sections of its accusations are redacted, World Liberty claims in the
suit that it froze Sun’s coins to “protect” itself and its investors
from prohibited conduct by Sun. Just before the $WLFI tokens started
trading, the company alleges, Sun placed a large bet against them,
transferring $300 million “to fund an aggressive short position.” It
also claims Sun made “straw purchases” on behalf of other investors.
Notably, though, World Liberty did not sue Sun for breach of contract or
fraud. “I believe that World Liberty is trying to threaten me into
silence, but that will not work,” says Sun. “I stand by the decision to
speak out about conduct that I believe was improper and harmful to token
holders.” He’s determined to take the case to trial: “I believe the
evidence will prove our allegations to be true.”
No
matter the outcome of the dueling legal actions — both are still in
preliminary stages (in June, World Liberty filed a motion to dismiss
Sun’s case) — the Trumps have raked in a quantity of crypto winnings
that will sustain them, and their potential future political endeavors,
for generations to come. Reading through the 927-page
financial-disclosure report released by the Office of Government Ethics
on June 30 can feel overwhelming — all those eight- and nine-figure
transactions, all those crypto assets, all those highly creative
monetization practices.
Meanwhile,
on Capitol Hill, the U.S. Senate is focused on trying to pass a law
that would create a regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies. The
so-called clarity Act has consumed a huge amount of Congress’s time and
energy over the past year and is being pushed by the same industry
donors that filled up Trump’s campaign coffers in 2024. The act would
give crypto strong legal protection going forward — a dream scenario for
a sector that was on the ropes before Trump’s second term. As of late
July, the main sticking point to getting enough votes in the Senate is
language that would bar all government officials — including the
president — from selling cryptocurrencies. Observers are not optimistic
that Trump will agree to the kinds of restrictions that would be
required to get the necessary Democratic votes. The crypto industry
might yet come to realize the downside of being in business with Donald
Trump.