Showing posts with label make america grunt again. Show all posts
Showing posts with label make america grunt again. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 29, 2026

DeSantis' Florida redistricting map advances — but draws GOP no votes, legal scrutiny

DeSantis' Florida redistricting map advances — but draws GOP no votes, legal scrutiny

 https://www.politico.com/news/2026/04/28/florida-redistricting-republican-votes-00897522

 

DeSantis' Florida redistricting map advances — but draws GOP no votes, legal scrutiny

Florida is seen as the last possible place before the November midterms for Republicans to gain seats in mid-decade redistricting, a process kickstarted last year by President Donald Trump and the White House.

A map of Florida split up by Congressional District.

The proposed congressional map, sent by Gov. Ron DeSantis to state lawmakers. | Office of Gov. Ron Desantis

By Gary Fineout and Kylie Williams




TALLAHASSEE, Florida — Florida’s Republican-controlled Legislature on Tuesday began quickly advancing new congressional maps that could deliver four more seats to the GOP. But legal questions still swirled around the mid-decade redistricting push by Gov. Ron DeSantis and prompted some Republican defections.

On the opening day of the state’s redistricting special session, a top aide for the GOP governor acknowledged to legislators that he relied on political data as part of his map drawing effort — a potential violation of voter-approved standards that ban lines drawn for partisan gain.

But lawyers for the governor asserted that the state doesn’t need to abide by these standards anymore — known as the “Fair Districts” amendments — due to a ruling last year from the state’s Supreme Court that dealt with minority voter protections.

Florida is seen as the last possible place before the November midterms for Republicans to gain seats in mid-decade redistricting, a process kickstarted last year by President Donald Trump and the White House.

Republicans already hold a 20-8 edge in the Sunshine State’s Hill delegation. The new map makes significant changes to the districts held by several Democrats including Reps. Kathy Castor, Darren Soto and Debbie Wasserman Schultz and places other incumbents such as Rep. Jared Moskowitz in a new district. Several organizations, including those with ties to national Democrats, have promised to sue if the map is adopted.

State senators of both parties grilled Jason Poreda, who once worked on redistricting for the Legislature, about who he talked to while drawing up the map and whether people outside the DeSantis administration reviewed the map before it was submitted.

Poreda, citing advice from lawyers for the governor, refused to say who he talked to about the map and whether it was seen by others. Several legislators also asked why Fox News was given a copy of the map that showed the partisan breakdown in red and blue before it was given to lawmakers. Poreda said he didn’t know the answer.

But Poreda contended that while he looked at partisan data, he used it as just one factor.

“It was not at the exclusion of everything else and was not predominant over everything else,” Poreda said.

The map was also drawn in a “race neutral” way that resulted in major changes to one South Florida district that had been held by Democratic Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick until she resigned earlier this month. A lawyer defended this approach based partly on an expected decision from the U.S. Supreme Court that could bar the use of racial considerations when redistricting.

Republicans have a supermajority in the Legislature, so the outcome of this week’s special session should not be in doubt. But that didn’t stop Democrats from blasting the effort as illegal.

“Nobody up here can say this is not politically motivated because it just would not be true,” said state Sen. Shevrin Jones, a Miami Gardens Democrat.

One Republican state senator — Jennifer Bradley — voted no in the Senate Rules Committee after saying the DeSantis map rests on an untested “legal theory.” Two other Republicans on the committee also voted against the map.

“I can’t do it, it’s just unconstitutional,” the Fleming Island Republican said.

Other Republican legislators, however, said they were willing to move ahead with the map.

State Rep. Jenna Persons-Mulicka, a Fort Myers Republican who is sponsoring the House version of the map, called the arguments from the governor’s office “persuasive.” She noted that DeSantis — who muscled through Florida’s current map in 2022 — was able to successfully defend it.

“We feel confident again in moving forward with the maps presented by the governor’s office,” said Persons-Mulicka.

The first day of the special session drew a contingent of opponents to the state Capitol ahead of the initial votes.

A coalition of voting rights advocacy groups rallied outside the Capitol. Several Democratic legislators joined about 150 protesters who carried signs and called for lawmakers to draw fair maps.

“We are witnessing an illegal power grab by greedy politicians who want to control the outcome of our elections before we even cast a vote,” said Genesis Robinson, the executive director of voting rights advocacy organization Equal Ground. “They want to rig maps so that they can pick their voters instead of voters picking their politicians.”

Speakers at the rally slammed the DeSantis administration for not releasing the maps until Monday, and said voters had not been given a chance to weigh in on how their communities would be affected by redistricting. Opponents also argued the new maps would further disenfranchise voters in districts that had already been changed when the DeSantis administration redrew congressional maps in 2022.

Reginald Gundy, a pastor at a Jacksonville Baptist church, said during the rally that he was declaring “a curse” on the legislative body, DeSantis and Trump until they “repent of what they’re doing and start doing what’s right.”

“We must declare it’s wrong. So I claim the power of God from upstairs to come down here and change this mess that’s going on,” Gundy said to loud cheers from the crowd.


Sunday, April 26, 2026

AI goldrush collides with voter backlash in Georgia

AI goldrush collides with voter backlash in Georgia

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/04/26/ai-data-centers-georgia-midterms-00888668 

 

AI goldrush collides with voter backlash in Georgia

Multibillion-dollar artificial intelligence hubs are beginning to scramble politics in the crucial swing state as voters worry about costs and local control.

Joe Reed points to maps of proposed factories and data centers.

Joe Reed, a resident of Jackson, Georgia, shows maps of proposed factories and data centers at his home on April 6, 2026. | Photos by David Walter Banks for POLITICO

By Alec Hernandez and Gabby Miller




FORSYTH, Georgia — A multibillion-dollar data center boom is provoking a bipartisan backlash in one of the nation’s most pivotal political battlegrounds.

Tax breaks, a stable power grid and vast tracts of undeveloped land have made Georgia a mecca for the artificial intelligence industry, with sprawling data center campuses under review or in development across rural acres and the Atlanta suburbs alike.

But public opposition to this growth is starting to bleed into local and statewide elections, including a competitive governor’s race and a Senate contest that could help decide the balance of power in Washington. Meanwhile, leading Republicans and Democrats in the state are still trying to find their footing on the issue, even as strategists and party officials on both sides of the aisle warn that it’s becoming impossible to ignore.

Voters angry about the boom say too many politicians are just failing to listen.

“I can’t picture anybody, including me, voting for anybody who has expressed approval of data centers or who has acted on behalf of them,” said Joe Reed, a 68-year-old retired educator, sitting at his dining room table overlooking a slice of quiet lakeside property on the outskirts of Jackson. The town southeast of Atlanta is just miles from several proposed data center sites. Reed, a political independent, now fears his quiet spot on the lake will be disrupted.

Joe Reed stands for a portrait next to a dock.

Joe Reed, 68, and his wife moved nearly 20 years ago to a quiet lakeside property on the outskirts of Jackson, Georgia — unaware that data centers would someday come.

Greg Head, who lives across the street from a new data megasite in the northern reaches of Forsyth, said he doesn’t oppose data centers in general — but he wanted more say in local officials’ decisions to approve this project.

“I’m going to vote for the individuals here locally that are going to listen to me and listen to us,” said Head, a 49-year-old heating and air conditioning contractor who normally votes for Republicans.

In Georgia, 47 percent of voters oppose data centers being built in their community, according to an Emerson College Polling/Nexstar Media poll from early March, 5 points higher than voters nationally. But neither party has broadly figured out how to talk about the issue, which pits hopes for jobs, tax revenue and economic growth against worries about power bills and water — even as a POLITICO Poll in January showed that data centers pose growing political risks.

“Georgia is a state microcosm of what’s going on across the country, and it’s going to be an information campaign that those of us that are in favor of data centers are going to have to accentuate and amplify,” said John Watson, a former Georgia Republican Party chair who now consults for the data center industry.

A grassy path with trees on both sides is seen.

This land near Rocky Creek Baptist Church is the site of a proposed data center in Forsyth, Georgia.

“There’s no disputing the fact that data centers are a hot topic,” Watson said. But he maintained that the political backlash is “absolutely reversible” — and doubted that the issue will determine who becomes Georgia’s next governor.

Other political veterans see data centers becoming an inevitable part of the state’s most important races.

“Once these campaigns really get moving pretty quickly in the next few weeks, I would be surprised if this doesn’t come up,” said Spiro Amburn, a Republican strategist and former chief of staff to two state House speakers. “At some point these candidates are going to have to articulate what their vision is for data centers and just the general business climate in Georgia.”

One of the first tests of Georgia’s data center politics played out earlier this year, when a special election to fill a state Senate seat became a proxy battle over the area’s burgeoning AI warehouse developments.

One candidate — former Forsyth Mayor Eric Wilson — lost despite having served over a decade in local office because voters associated him with the data center development planned in the city, said Monroe County Republican Party Chair Noah Harbuck, a member of Forsyth’s Planning and Zoning Commission. Steven McNeel, the eventual winner, opposed the industry’s tax breaks and called for safeguards against consumer utility rate hikes.

Wilson, now running for a state House seat, acknowledged that data centers played a role in the race but cautioned against ascribing his loss to the AI hub alone.

“A lot of people can speculate different reasons when you missed something as close as we did in the special,” he said. “Data centers were a factor, and it was discussed in the race. How much of a factor is hard to tell.”

Harbuck supports the Forsyth data project but said it’s clearly a red line for some voters.

Noah Harbuck leans on a car as he stands for a portrait.

Noah Harbuck, Monroe County Republican Party chair and member of the Forsyth Planning and Zoning Commission, stands for a portrait in Forsyth, Georgia.

“It’s just like Christians with abortion: If somebody supports abortion, you’re not gonna vote for that person,” Harbuck said. “I think the majority of people don’t care. But I think there is a lot more people that would say no to data centers than say, ‘Heck yeah.’”

‘We’ll see some bad outcomes in November’

The rest of Georgia’s election calendar includes races with outsize national implications. Among those are Democratic Sen. Jon Ossoff’s bid to hold onto his seat as three Republicans seek to take him on, in a must-win battle for both parties’ hopes of controlling the Senate.

Ossoff told the chair of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in an April letter that his office would investigate data centers’ impacts on utility bills in Georgia. His Republican opponents have said little publicly about the data boom.

The fight is playing out even more acutely in the open governor’s race. Some Democrats are calling for pauses in development and investigations of the centers’ economic and environmental impact. Republicans, meanwhile, say local officials should be the ones making the biggest decisions. And leaders in both parties want to roll back tax incentives for the facilities’ developers.

Several Democratic gubernatorial candidates said they’ve had to field voters’ questions about data centers at their campaign stops regularly. Former Sen. Jason Esteves has held special events aimed at discussing their growth, including most recently a Monday town hall in suburban Atlanta, and has promised to abolish the tax incentives that make Georgia an appealing destination for the industry. Geoff Duncan, a former Republican-turned-Democrat, also wants to overhaul the incentives and thinks communities and local leaders should have more control over where data centers are built.

A shirt opposing new factories is seen.

A shirt opposing new factories is seen at Reed’s home in Jackson, Georgia, on April 6, 2026.

“Every room I walk into there are at least one question about data centers and what my positioning is on it,” he told POLITICO.

The Democratic frontrunner, former Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms, has taken a more hardline approach, suggesting in an interview with the Columbus Ledger-Enquirer that she would halt data center construction pending a review of their impact.

On the Republican side, candidates are on the whole more supportive of the projects at large, but stress that local authorities — on either the municipal or county level — should have the most control over where they are built.

Two Republicans — Lt. Gov. Burt Jones and billionaire Rick Jackson — have come under fire for their own ties to the hubs.

Jackson has invested in a data center in Texas, but none in Georgia. Jones has faced accusations that he pushed for policy changes that opened the door to allowing a sprawling data center to be built in his home county — and in turn benefit his father, who partially owns the land. Jones told POLITICO that neither he nor his family are invested in any local data centers directly.

Rick Jackson speaks with John King and Saul Davidson.

Georgia gubernatorial candidate Rick Jackson, center, converses before a Banks County Republican campaign event April 8 in Homer, Georgia.

The political debate around data centers is “inescapable right now, because the voters here are extremely sophisticated. They know what questions to ask,” said Connie Di Cicco, the legislative director for Georgia Conservation Voters. “They are coming to town halls and asking questions with a level of acumen that is astounding.”

“It’s unavoidable for elected officials to not be addressing this issue. How they’re addressing it is the real question, and whether they’re addressing it in a genuine way to actually be helpful,” she added.

Nationally, Trump is trying to soothe voters’ unhappiness with data centers’ voracious energy needs by striking agreements for tech companies to pay for their own electricity supplies, a move he said would provide “some PR help” for the industry. Experts are still divided on how well that approach will work.

But elected leaders and voters in some states are rejecting the push.

Maine, another Senate battleground, was the first to pass a law banning new data centers through 2027 — an idea popularized by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), who are proposing a nationwide moratorium on new complexes. (Democratic Gov. Janet Mills vetoed the bill Friday.) The city council of Chandler, Arizona, and voters in a small Wisconsin city also rejected data center projects in their areas, while voters in one small town in Missouri this month voted out four council members who had approved a $6 billion data center.

In Georgia, though, state lawmakers’ efforts to suspend developers’ tax breaks, pause data center construction or otherwise respond to unhappy voters have repeatedly fallen short. Those included a GOP-led attempt this year to protect consumers from shouldering rising power costs.

Republican state Sen. Chuck Hufstetler, who sponsored that measure, has warned lawmakers that data centers will be on the ballot this year.

“Everyone should heed that advice and make sure we take care of our consumers, because if not, I think we’ll see some bad outcomes in November,” the northwest Georgia lawmaker told POLITICO.

Geography matters

Middle Georgia voters’ worries about the advent of AI megasites change across county lines.

In Jackson, about 20 miles from Monroe County’s data center developments, several of the nearly dozen residents who spoke with POLITICO expressed more concern about the influx of spring breakers stopping by on a sunny Monday afternoon to tour the area’s “Stranger Things” filming locations.

Most had heard about the data centers — and the ensuing debates — on the local news or in Facebook groups. But many said they did not care about the developments, nor did they see the issue affecting their vote. Even more said they did not know enough to share an opinion.

The Butts County Courthouse is seen a the town square.

The Butts County Courthouse in Jackson, Georgia.

Just a few miles south, voters were more willing to signal their displeasure — both with the nearby data warehouses and with the elected officials who approved them.

Head, the Monroe County resident who is set to live across from one of these sites, runs a heating and air condition company, is an elected school board member and serves on the county’s development authority. After a busy day, he said, he relishes being surrounded by acres of untouched nature.

When Forsyth annexed land across from his home and later approved it as a data center site, Head was furious. Living outside the city’s boundaries, he is unable to vote for the officials who greenlighted the development.

“I think the majority in this county is asking for smart, controlled growth,” Head said. “What that means is, you bring in a data center, you need to put it in a proper place.”

Greg Head sits for a portrait at a table outdoors.

“You bring in a data center, you need to put it in a proper place,” said Monroe County resident Greg Head, who lives across the street from a new data megasite in the northern reaches of Forsyth, Georgia.

Still, he said, he would rather the site be a data center rather than a shipping warehouse or retail space, which would draw more traffic to the backroad he lives near.

Reed, who lives just 20 minutes north, said he and his neighbors have long opposed the development of data centers and shipping warehouses adjacent to their quiet streets. For years, he has staged protests at some of the proposed sites, written letters to their corporate leadership and testified at county meetings across the region. (Reed is a political independent who mounted a third-party run for state representative in 2020 over his general dissatisfaction with both parties.)

He and his wife moved to a quiet spot on the lake nearly 20 years ago, hoping it would serve as a midway point between their adult children and grandchildren in North Carolina and Florida. Had Reed known the data centers were coming, he said, maybe they would have settled elsewhere.

“If you and I would quit using ChatGPT and buying stuff from Amazon, we wouldn’t need them,” he said.

“But that’s not going away.”


Saturday, April 25, 2026

‘Americans are suffering’: Trump’s disapproval climbs to HIGHEST level of 2nd term

‘Americans are suffering’: Trump’s disapproval climbs to HIGHEST level of 2nd term