Sunday, February 1, 2026

How Western officials, media coverage pushed to discredit Gaza death toll

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/2/1/how-western-officials-media-coverage-pushed-to-discredit-gaza-death-toll 

 

How Western officials, media coverage pushed to discredit Gaza death toll

Rights advocates say casting doubt over Gaza death toll dehumanised Palestinians as Israel now acknowledges 70,000 killed.

Palestinians stand outside destroyed building
Palestinians inspect the site of an Israeli attack in Gaza City, January 31, 2026 [Dawoud Abu Alkas/Reuters]

But in the United States, Israel’s top ally, then-President Joe Biden cast doubt over the suffering and death count of Palestinians, as provided by the Ministry of Health in Gaza, to push back against calls for ending the brutal Israeli assault.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

“What they say to me is I have no notion that the Palestinians are telling the truth about how many people are killed. I’m sure innocents have been killed, and it’s the price of waging a war,” Biden said in October 2023.

“But I have no confidence in the number that the Palestinians are using,” he said.

More than two years later, as the Palestinian death toll grew tenfold, the Israeli military acknowledged that it killed more than 70,000 Palestinians, confirming the Health Ministry’s data.

Rights advocates say Western officials and media outlets helped the Israeli denial of the scope of atrocities in Gaza, contributing to the dehumanisation of Palestinians.

Abed Ayoub, executive director at the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC), said the US government attempted to “gaslight” the world and discredit the Health Ministry numbers.

“This government played a role in that, and the Biden administration played a role in that,” he told Al Jazeera.

“They laid the groundwork for the Israeli officials to do the same thing. But ultimately, at the end, you cannot keep lying about what the world has been watching and witnessing with our own eyes,” Ayoub said.

4:26
  • Now Playing
    04:26
    Israel set to reopen Rafah crossing; but how many Palestinians can leave or return to Gaza?

    Israel set to reopen Rafah crossing; but how many Palestinians can leave or return to Gaza?

  • Next
    06:36
    Rafah opening a 'token' that 'doesn't scratch the surface' of Gaza crisis, says doctor

    Rafah opening a 'token' that 'doesn't scratch the surface' of Gaza crisis, says doctor

  • 02:10
    Hanoi's street food culture fades as Vietnam modernises

    Hanoi's street food culture fades as Vietnam modernises

  • 00:32
    Israel reopens Rafah border crossing between Gaza and Egypt

    Israel reopens Rafah border crossing between Gaza and Egypt

  • 02:43
    Venezuela's factories endure crisis as workers await economic revival

    Venezuela's factories endure crisis as workers await economic revival

The death toll

Several Israeli media outlets quoted senior military officials last week as saying they accept that the death toll in Gaza is about 70,000.

The Israeli government later tried to walk back that acknowledgement, saying the “details published do not reflect official [military] data”.

Get instant alerts and updates based on your interests. Be the first to know when big stories happen.

As of Sunday, the Palestinian Health Ministry put the death toll since October 7, 2023, at 71,769, including 506 people who were killed after the United States-brokered “ceasefire” came into effect in October last year.

Humanitarian agencies and United Nations officials have repeatedly said the tally presented by health officials in Gaza is accurate.

But some experts say the true death toll – which includes thousands of missing people, unreported deaths and fatalities linked to the Israeli blockade and destruction of the health system – is far higher than reported.

Last year, a study published in The Lancet medical journal estimated that deaths in Gaza are under-reported by 41 percent.

Still, Israel’s supporters in the US and the West have pushed to portray Palestinians as unreliable sources to report on their own suffering, casting doubt over the death toll in Gaza.

In 2024, the US House of Representatives passed a bipartisan bill to ban the Department of State from citing death statistics from the Health Ministry in Gaza.

Pro-Israel commentators, politicians and advocacy groups have argued for more than two years that the Palestinian data should not be trusted.

Hatem Abudayyeh, chair of the US Palestinian Community Network (USPCN), said the world should believe Palestinians when they expose Israeli atrocities in Gaza and beyond.

“It’s time for US and other Western press to do their jobs, to challenge the US and Israeli Zionist narrative, and to print the truth about the genocide, the continued violations of the ‘ceasefire’, and all of Israel’s and the US’s crimes against humanity,” Abudayyeh told Al Jazeera.

2:32
Israel kills 31, including children, in new Gaza ceasefire violation

‘Hamas-run’ Health Ministry

Throughout the war, many Western media outlets – including most prominently the BBC, AFP, Fox News and CNN – have prefaced any reference to the Health Ministry in Gaza as “Hamas-run” – an editorial policy that critics say attempted to demean Palestinians and dismiss their deaths.

At times, CNN inserted an additional disclaimer in its stories about Gaza, saying it “cannot independently verify the ministry’s figures”.

The New York Times has also previously referred to the Health Ministry as “Hamas-controlled”.

While the Health Ministry is part of the governing structure in Gaza, which was controlled by Hamas, it has been run by public health professionals, and there is no evidence that the Palestinian group interferes in its operations or statistics.

Ironically, even in reporting the Israeli acknowledgement of the Health Ministry’s data, the BBC’s headline on Friday read: “Israeli media cite official accepting Hamas figure of 70,000 war dead”.

The BBC did not respond to Al Jazeera’s request for comment by the time of publication.

Ayoub said many mainstream media outlets unquestionably published Israeli propaganda over the past two years while raising doubt over Palestinian accounts.

“It’s another reason and another example of why there’s been a complete loss of trust and faith in any mainstream media,” he told Al Jazeera. “This genocide has really given room, more so than any event in recent history, to third-party and independent media outlets.”


Judge orders release of 5-year-old detained by ICE in Minnesota

 https://www.politico.com/news/2026/01/31/judge-ice-minnesota-deportations-00758970

Judge orders release of 5-year-old detained by ICE in Minnesota

The judge accused the Trump administration of inhumanity in its approach to deportations.

Minneapolis residents protest against ICE.

People protest against Immigration and Customs Enforcement in downtown Minneapolis on Jan. 25, 2026. | Adam Gray/AP

By Kyle Cheney

A federal judge on Saturday ordered the immediate release of Adrian Conejo Arias and his 5-year-old son Liam, whose apprehension by federal authorities — captured in a viral photo — became a symbol of the Trump administration’s aggressive deportation surge in Minnesota.

District Judge Fred Biery appended the famous picture to a blistering three-page ruling that accused the Trump administration of vast lawlessness and inhumanity in its deportation push. And the judge took aim at President Donald Trump himself, seemingly comparing the president to a “would-be authoritarian king” that the nation’s founders warned against.

“Observing human behavior confirms that for some among us, the perfidious lust for unbridled power and the imposition of cruelty in its quest know no bounds and are bereft of human decency,” Biery, a 78-year-old Clinton appointee based in Texas, wrote in the three-page ruling. “And the rule of law be damned.”

The Trump administration’s mass deportation push has led to a long string of judicial rebukes around the country, particularly as immigration authorities have sought to arrest large numbers of people while their deportation proceedings are playing out. Hundreds of judges have rejected that widespread detention effort multiple times in recent months.

And federal judges in Minnesota — where the Trump administration has deployed thousands of federal agents for an enforcement surge — have described violations of court orders at a massive scale.

Biery concluded that only a “judicial finger in the dike” had been protecting the nation.

The judge had a role in the case because of ICE’s move to quickly transfer Liam and his father to Texas after they were detained. Last week, the judge ordered the Department of Homeland Security to keep the two in Texas while the case was proceeding. Now, he is requiring the administration to release them by Feb. 3.

The Department of Homeland Security and the Justice Department have accused judges of being “rogue” and “activist” in their rejection of the administration’s tactics.

A DHS spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Takeaways from the millions of newly released Epstein files

 https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cevnmxyy4wjo?utm_source=firefox-newtab-en-us

Takeaways from the millions of newly released Epstein files

Sakshi Venkatramanand
Kwasi Gyamfi Asiedu
Watch: What's in the latest batch of released Epstein files?

Millions of new files relating to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein have been released by the US Department of Justice (DOJ), the largest number of documents shared by the government since a law mandated their release last year.

Three million pages, 180,000 images and 2,000 videos were posted publicly on Friday.

The release came six weeks after the department missed a deadline signed into law by US President Donald Trump that mandated all Epstein-related documents be shared with the public.

"Today's release marks the end of a very comprehensive document identification and review process to ensure transparency to the American people and compliance," Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said.

The files include details about Jeffrey Epstein's time in prison - including a psychological report - and his death while incarcerated, along with investigative records on Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's associate who was convicted of helping him traffic underaged girls.

They also include emails between Epstein and high-profile figures.

Many of the emails and documents go back more than a decade, showcasing Epstein's relationships amid his legal troubles. He was convicted in 2008 in Florida for soliciting sex from a 14-year-old girl after coming to a controversial plea agreement with prosecutors.

He died in August 2019 while in jail on charges in a sprawling sex trafficking case.

Getty Images A close photo of Jeffrey Epstein. He sits down and looks at the camera, wearing a dark coloured shirt Getty Images

Epstein invited 'The Duke' to meet Russian woman

The documents shed light on the disgraced financier's close association with Britain's elite.

They include emails between Epstein and a person named "The Duke" - believed to be Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor - discussing having dinner at Buckingham Palace, where there was "lots of privacy".

Another message from Epstein includes an offer to introduce "The Duke" to a 26-year-old Russian woman.

The emails are signed "A", with a signature that appears to read "HRH Duke of York KG". They were exchanged in August 2010, two years after Epstein pleaded guilty to soliciting a minor.

In the latest file release, there is also a photo that appears to show the former prince kneeling on all fours over a female lying on the ground.

There are also emails between Epstein and Mountbatten-Windsor dated February 2011 - putting more holes in Andrew's assurances that he had cut off any contact with Epstein the previous year.

The emails do not indicate any wrongdoing.

The BBC has contacted Andrew, formerly known as the Duke of York, for a response. Mountbatten-Windsor has faced years of scrutiny over his past friendship with Epstein. He has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing.

Some emails in the latest release appear to be between Epstein and Sarah Ferguson, Andrew's ex-wife.

One email dated 4 April 2009, was signed "Love, Sarah, The red Head.!!"

It says that she was going to be in Palm Beach and wanted to have tea. The email goes on to discuss ideas for Ferguson's company, Mother's Army. The former Duchess of York refers to Epstein as "My dear spectacular and special friend Jeffrey".

She calls him a "legend" and says "I am so proud of you".

The financier was still under house arrest for his 2008 conviction when the email exchange was sent.

There are also hundreds of mentions of Richard Branson, the British founder of Virgin Group, in the files. In an email exchange from 2013, Branson appears to tell Epstein that it was "really nice" seeing him, adding: "Any time you're in the area would love to see you. As long as you bring your harem!"

Virgin Group clarified that "harem" referred to three adult members of Epstein's team, adding: "Any contact Richard and Joan Branson had with Epstein took place on only a few occasions more than twelve years ago, and was limited to group or business settings, such as a charity tennis event."

US Department of Justice A grey-haired man dressed in a white polo shirt and blue jeans looks directly at the camera. He is on all fours directly over an unidentified female who is laying on the floor.US Department of Justice
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has always denied any wrongdoing

Epstein sent money to Mandelson's husband

Other emails show Epstein sent £10,000 ($13,692) to Lord Peter Mandelson's husband Reinaldo Avila da Silva in 2009.

In an email to Epstein, da Silva sets out the costs of an osteopathy course, provides his bank details and thanks the financier for "anything you can help me with".

Epstein replies a few hours later saying he would wire the loan amount and da Silva, who married Mandelson in 2023, replies with a thank you the following day.

In another batch of emails, Lord Mandelson asks to stay at one of Epstein's properties.

The emails are from 16 June 2009, when Epstein was serving a prison sentence for soliciting prostitution from someone under the age of 18. For much of his sentence, Epstein was allowed to work from his office during the day and returned to jail each night.

In December 2024, Lord Mandelson was appointed as the UK's ambassador to the US, but was sacked less than a year later when it emerged he had sent supportive messages to Epstein following the conviction.

Lord Mandelson has repeatedly said he regrets his past friendship with Epstein, which has long been public knowledge. He has said he never saw any wrongdoing while with Epstein and "fell for his lies".

Trump mentioned hundreds of times

The US president is mentioned hundreds of times in the newly released files. Trump had a friendship with Epstein but he says it soured many years ago and has denied any knowledge of his sex crimes.

Among the new documents is a list compiled by the FBI last year of allegations made against Trump by callers to its national Threat Operation Center tip line. Many of these appear to be based on unverified tips received by the agency and were made without supporting evidence.

The list includes numerous allegations of sexual abuse made against Trump, Epstein and other high-profile figures.

Trump has consistently denied any wrongdoing in relation to Epstein and has not been accused of any crimes by Epstein's victims.

When asked about the latest allegations, both the White House and justice department pointed to a line in a news release accompanying the new batch of files.

"Some of the documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election," the US Justice Department said.

"To be clear, the claims are unfounded and false, and if they have a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponised against President Trump already."

Elon Musk asked Epstein when 'wildest party' on his island will be

The documents also include email correspondence between Epstein and tech billionaire Elon Musk.

Musk, who has not been accused of any wrongdoing in the case, has previously said that Epstein had invited him to his island but he had declined.

The new emails show Musk had discussed travelling there on more than one occasion - including a proposed 2012 trip - in which he asked Epstein: "What day/night will be the wildest party on your island?"

The emails from November 2012 show Epstein asked how many people Musk would need transporting on a helicopter to the island and Musk replies that it would only be himself and his then-wife, Talulah Riley.

An email from Musk to Epstein on Christmas in 2012 includes Musk inquiring whether the financier had any parties planned because he needs to "let loose".

"I've been working to the edge of sanity this year and so, once my kids head home after Christmas, I really want to hit the party scene in St Barts or elsewhere and let loose," he writes, adding that a "peaceful island experience" is the opposite of what he's wanting.

In another batch of emails from the end of 2013, Musk and Epstein discuss a visit to the financier's island and are working on logistics and dates.

There is no evidence that Musk ever did end up taking a trip to Epstein's island.

Musk said in an X post on Saturday that he was "well aware that some email correspondence with [Epstein] could be misinterpreted and used by detractors to smear my name".

He added: "I don't care about that, but what I do care about is that we at least attempt to prosecute those who committed serious crimes with Epstein, especially regarding heinous exploitation of underage girls."

Bill Gates dismisses lurid claims by Epstein as 'absurd and false'

A spokesperson for Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates has responded to lurid allegations contained in the latest Epstein files – including that he caught a sexually-transmitted disease – calling them "absolutely absurd and completely false".

Two emails from 18 July 2013 appear to have been drafted by Epstein but it is unclear if they were ever sent to Gates. Both were sent from Epstein's email account and back to the same account, while no email account associated with Gates is visible and both emails are unsigned.

One email is written as a resignation letter from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and complains about having had to procure medicine for Gates "to deal with the consequences of sex with Russian girls".

The other, which begins "dear Bill", complains about Gates having ended a friendship and makes more claims about Gates having tried to cover up a sexually transmitted infection, including from his then-wife, Melinda.

A spokesperson for Gates told the BBC: "These claims – from a proven, disgruntled liar – are absolutely absurd and completely false."

They added: "The only thing these documents demonstrate is Epstein's frustration that he did not have an ongoing relationship with Gates and the lengths he would go to entrap and defame."

Criticism over identification of victims

Gloria Allred: Epstein victims 'devastated' by latest files

Gloria Allred, a women's rights lawyer who has represented many of Epstein's victims, told the BBC that numerous survivors' names had been disclosed in the latest release, including some who had not been previously identified publicly.

Many of the documents released on Friday include heavy redactions. The law mandates that redactions can only be made to protect victims or information currently under investigation. It also mandates a summary of the redactions made and the legal basis for them.

Deputy Attorney General Blanche said the redactions aimed to protect victims and the justice department had hundreds of employees combing through the documents for more than two months to ensure they were released quickly.

But Allred said Blanche's stated hope that the release would "bring closure" to the victims was "ridiculous".

"They have devastated so many of these survivors by publicly releasing their names," Allred said.

"In some cases... they have a line through the names but you can still read the names.

"In other cases, they've shown photos of victims - survivors who have never done a public interview, never given their name publicly."

The justice department said it was "working around the clock to address any victim concerns, additional redactions of personally identifiable information, as well as any files that require further redactions under the Act, to include images of a sexual nature".

Allred said that while her legal team was working to inform the department of where further redactions were needed to protect survivors' identities, "many people have already downloaded the files".

Allred described the situation as "an absolute mess", saying the department "should be ashamed of themselves".

Have all the Epstein files now been released?

It is uncertain if this is the end of the road for the Epstein documents release saga.

Blanche said Friday's drop "marks the end of a very comprehensive document identification and review process" signalling that as far as the US justice department is concerned, it's job over.

However, Democrats continue to argue that the department has withheld too many documents – possibly around two-and-a-half million – without proper justification.

Democratic Congressman Ro Khanna, who spearheaded the Epstein Files Transparency Act alongside Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, said he's wary.

"The DOJ said it identified over 6 million potentially responsive pages but is releasing only about 3.5 million after review and redactions," he said.

"This raises questions as to why the rest are being withheld. I will be reviewing closely to see if they release what I've been pushing for."

The DOJ had been under heavy scrutiny after missing the 19 December deadline to release all files as mandated in the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which passed Congress and was signed into law in November.

But still, whether this saga is over remains to be seen.

Many - including within Trump's base - have long believed there was a conspiracy to protect the rich and powerful who were connected to Epstein.

Blanche acknowledged the release of these documents would not satisfy that need for more information. He said the files don't contain the names of specific men who abused women and that, if the department had those names, the men would be prosecuted.

"I don't think that the public or you all are going to uncover men within the Epstein files that abused women, unfortunately."

Additional reporting by Jack Fenwick, Chi Chi Izundu and Amy Walker