https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/07/19/twitter-elon-musk-trial/
twitter wins first round
songs poems and political musings, trumpmas, dada, drumpf, the 40 days of trumpmas, trump, election
a little bird told me
Elon Musk responds to Twitter’s threat to sue him over reneging on deal with a meme
Musk calls for Trump's impeachment
https://www.axios.com/2025/06/05/musk-trump-impeachment

Photo: Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images
Elon Musk unleashed a fresh round of tweets late Thursday afternoon, calling for President Trump to be impeached and declaring that SpaceX would begin decommissioning a spacecraft essential to NASA's operation — though he later backtracked on this threat.
Why it matters: Trump's threat to cancel billions of dollars of government contracts with Musk's companies has ignited a new round of escalation in the explosive civil war between the two former allies.
Driving the news: "In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately," Musk wrote on X.
The intrigue: Ian Miles Cheong, a prominent Musk supporter and right-wing activist on X, tweeted: "President vs Elon. Who wins? My money's on Elon. Trump should be impeached and JD Vance should replace him."
Musk, the world's richest man, also spent much of the afternoon tweeting about Trump's alleged ties to notorious sex offender and financier Jeffrey Epstein.
The big picture: The stunning collapse of the relationship was ostensibly triggered by Musk's scathing criticism of Trump's signature bill, which is projected to add trillions to the national debt.
What to watch: The MAGA coalition is now under massive pressure to pick sides, splintering after six months of a mostly harmonious relationship between the president and the world's richest man.
More from Axios:
Editor's note: This article has been updated Elon Musk's Thursday night X post saying that he won't decommission Dragon.
https://capitalbnews.org/xai-musk-data-centers-clean-air-epa/
This story is from Floodlight, a nonprofit newsroom that investigates the powers stalling climate action, and produced in partnership with The Guardian. Sign up for Floodlight’s newsletter here.
Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence company is continuing to fuel its data centers with unpermitted gas turbines, according to a Floodlight visual investigation. Thermal drone footage shows xAI is still burning gas at a facility in Southaven, Miss., despite a recent Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ruling reiterating that doing so requires a state permit in advance.
State regulators in Mississippi maintain that since the turbines are parked on tractor trailers, they don’t require permits. However, the EPA has long required that such pollution sources be permitted under the Clean Air Act.
Any exemption for these machines “could leave these engines subject to no emission standards at all,” the agency wrote in a January final ruling.
However, thermal images captured by Floodlight — and analyzed by multiple experts — show more than a dozen unpermitted turbines still spewing pollutants at the plant nearly two weeks after the EPA’s recent ruling.
“That is a violation of the law,” said Bruce Buckheit, a former EPA air enforcement chief, after reviewing Floodlight’s images and EPA regulations.
xAI, which is seeking permits for dozens more turbines in Southaven, did not respond to multiple requests for comment. The EPA, which under Trump has initiated a record low number of enforcement actions, declined to answer questions about the turbines at Musk’s AI facilities and referred to local authorities on permits.
The first and only public hearing on the matter is scheduled for February 17, and the public comment period is still open.
The Trump administration has made AI a priority, but as data centers proliferate across the country, regulators are struggling to keep pace with the industry’s increasing reliance on custom-built power sources and their public health impacts on surrounding communities. And Southaven, where state regulators are at odds with federal guidance, is a prime example.
The turbines there help power Grok, the company’s controversial chat bot, and emit harmful pollutants linked to health problems such as asthma, lung cancer and heart attacks.
“The risk of living next to this type of power plant is well documented,” said Shaolei Ren, a UC Riverside associate professor who specializes in the health impacts of data centers. “From the health perspective, we know that this is not good.”
Southaven residents have voiced concerns for months over the noise and pollution emanating from the 114-acre site that is largely hidden from public view — a site xAI is looking to expand.
“For them to be releasing so much pollution in such a populated area, not to mention that there are at least ten schools within a two mile radius of the facility, is really concerning,” said longtime resident Shannon Samsa. “It’s horrifying to me that we’re allowing this in our community.”

The Southaven turbine cluster is part of xAi’s rapidly growing footprint along the Tennessee-Mississippi border. That expansion began in the spring of 2024 in South Memphis, next to historically Black neighborhoods, with the construction of Colossus 1, which the company touted as the world’s largest AI supercomputer.
The Southern Environmental Law Center released thermal images in April revealing that xAi had been operating more than 30 unpermitted gas-powered turbines at that site.
“We were hopeful that the health department would step in,” said Patrick Anderson, a senior attorney at the SELC. “That never happened.”
County officials in Tennessee maintained the turbines did not require a permit despite longstanding EPA policy that they do. In July, amid local pushback, the county permitted 15 turbines for use at Colossus 1.

On January 15, the EPA reiterated its decades-old policy that such machines need a permit. By then, xAi had already built a second data center in the area, Colossus 2. To power it, the company parked 27 turbines just across the stateline in Southaven, Miss., a diverse suburb of Memphis with higher than average levels of air pollution.
“When you’re talking about these turbines, think of the jet engine,” said Buckheit.
Despite the EPA’s recent directive, Floodlight’s thermal imagery — analyzed by multiple experts — shows 15 unpermitted turbines in operation at Southaven. Public records obtained by Floodlight show 18 of the 27 turbines have been used since November, at least.
“One might easily have expected, since this has been going on for some months, at least [issue a] stop work order,” said Buckheit, who served during the Republican Gerald Ford and George W. Bush administrations. He also said the EPA could refer the case to the Department of Justice.
“But apparently that didn’t happen.”

An EPA spokesperson did not answer Floodlight’s questions relating to its enforcement options, instead saying, “EPA does not approve the operation of gas turbines at facilities, that would be the state or local air permitting authority.”
Air permits are traditionally handled by state agencies. However, according to its own website, the EPA is responsible for making sure these agencies comply with federal regulations and “generally will take enforcement action” if a state government fails to “take timely and appropriate action.”
xAI “violated the Clean Air Act the first time, and now they’re gonna copy and paste and do it again,” said Anderson. “I maybe had some naive hope that the regulators who are most in the day-to-day business of implementing the Clean Air Act in Mississippi would do the right thing.”
In response to Floodlight’s questions, a spokesperson from the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality said the EPA’s recent rule leaves permitting decisions to state authorities.
“The turbines currently operating at the Southaven facility are classified as portable/mobile units under state law and therefore remain exempt from air permitting requirements during this temporary period,” they said. “Nothing in the EPA’s January 15 rule altered that determination under Mississippi regulations.”


An asthmatic, Krystal Polk said she was forced to empty out the home that’s been in her family for generations and cancel her plans to retire there out of concerns for her health after xAI began operating gas powered turbines directly across the street from her property. (Evan Simon/Floodight)
Longtime resident Krystal Polk said she had no idea xAI was coming to Southaven until black fences were set up across the street from her house. The area, she said, was once quiet and serene, with an abundance of wildlife, but is now bombarded by ceaseless noise and pollution.
“I do feel like xAi is playing by a different set of rules,” she said.
An asthmatic, Polk said she was forced to empty out the home that’s been in her family for generations and cancel her plans to retire there out of concerns for her health.
“We are a casualty of the whole data center race,” she said. “I feel that my voice doesn’t matter.”
The spokesperson for the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality said the agency takes public concern around emissions, noise and overall quality of life seriously, and though the turbines — in their view — do not require permits, all “applicable air quality standards still apply.”

Despite lofty sustainability goals put forward by industry leaders, data centers across the country are increasingly turning to fossil fuels to power the AI boom by using custom-built power plants like the ones seen in Southaven.
Roughly 75% of this power comes from natural gas, according to a recent report by CleanView, which tracks clean energy and data center projects.
“Nearly every project we reviewed mentions renewables, hydrogen, or nuclear in its public announcements,” the author wrote, but renewables aren’t scheduled until 2028 or later.
And “nuclear is a decade away,” he said.
Now, xAI is seeking to expand in Southaven, applying in January for a permit to operate 41 turbines at the site.
The facility could emit more than 6 million tons of greenhouse gases and over 1,300 tons of health-harming air pollutants every year, according to xAI’s permit application. That would make it among the largest fossil fuel power plants in the state. The company also purchased property in Southaven for a third data center that, when completed, will make the Colossus cluster — spanning Memphis to Southaven — one of the largest data center complexes in the world.

“It would be devastating,” said Samsa, the Southaven resident. “No community in their right mind would want something like this in their backyards.”
Samsa, a physician’s assistant, had hoped to raise a family in Southaven, but the presence of xAi’s gas-powered turbines has made her and her husband reconsider. She has helped collect more than 1,000 signatures for a petition demanding Mississippi authorities shut down the plant.
“I don’t want my children to be growing up around such massive amounts of air pollution,” she said. “I don’t want them to have to live in a place where their health and their overall well-being is not considered over economics.”
Floodlight is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates the powers stalling climate action.
a little bird told me
Elon Musk responds to Twitter’s threat to sue him over reneging on deal with a meme
twitter users complaining of a musky odor are now relieved since the cause has been found and prospectively eliminated
Musk calls for Trump's impeachment
https://www.axios.com/2025/06/05/musk-trump-impeachment

Photo: Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images
Elon Musk unleashed a fresh round of tweets late Thursday afternoon, calling for President Trump to be impeached and declaring that SpaceX would begin decommissioning a spacecraft essential to NASA's operation — though he later backtracked on this threat.
Why it matters: Trump's threat to cancel billions of dollars of government contracts with Musk's companies has ignited a new round of escalation in the explosive civil war between the two former allies.
Driving the news: "In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately," Musk wrote on X.
The intrigue: Ian Miles Cheong, a prominent Musk supporter and right-wing activist on X, tweeted: "President vs Elon. Who wins? My money's on Elon. Trump should be impeached and JD Vance should replace him."
Musk, the world's richest man, also spent much of the afternoon tweeting about Trump's alleged ties to notorious sex offender and financier Jeffrey Epstein.
The big picture: The stunning collapse of the relationship was ostensibly triggered by Musk's scathing criticism of Trump's signature bill, which is projected to add trillions to the national debt.
What to watch: The MAGA coalition is now under massive pressure to pick sides, splintering after six months of a mostly harmonious relationship between the president and the world's richest man.
More from Axios:
Editor's note: This article has been updated Elon Musk's Thursday night X post saying that he won't decommission Dragon.
while searching for the ghost of christmas past we accidentally set the controls for christmas in the year 2025 and find a world controlled by the warlike factions of ELONS
and MURDOCHS
Reading time 3 minutes
“No one pushed harder than me to have the Epstein files released and I’m glad that has finally happened,” Elon Musk wrote on Saturday.
He also now claims, “I had very little correspondence with Epstein and
declined repeated invitations to go to his island or fly on his ‘Lolita
Express’, but was well aware that some email correspondence with him
could be misinterpreted and used by detractors to smear my name.”
Sorry but “misinterpreted”? Even if you do your absolute damndest to read this guy’s freshly released Epstein emails
in a positive light, what you get is the story of a tech tycoon stating
unambiguously that he wanted to attend an absolute rager on a sex
criminal’s private island.
“What day/night will be the wildest party on your island?” Elon Musk asked Jeffrey Epstein on on Nov. 25, 2012.
In 2019, Musk told Vanity Fair
that in their past interactions, he had detected that Epstein was
“obviously a creep.” Indeed, it wouldn’t have taken much sleuthing to
pick up on this attribute of Epstein’s back in 2012. He already had a
conviction on his record at the time for soliciting prostitution, and it
was also widely reported in the media that the prostitution conviction stemmed from a generous plea bargain, and that the charges Epstein had been facing included sexual relations with minors.
So with that in mind, here’s what Musk and Epstein wrote as they attempted to make plans in 2012 for Musk to visit Epstein’s island with British actress Talulah Riley, Musk’s wife at the time (typos and other text issues are left intact. I don’t want to be accused of misinterpreting):
Epstein: you are welcome to stay or just come for the day, plenty of rroom i will=send heli to get you
Musk: Do you have any parties planned? I’ve been working to the edge of sanity th=s year and so, once my kids head home after Christmas, I really want to hi= the party scene in St Barts or elsewhere and let loose. The invitation is=much appreciated, but a peaceful island experience is the opposite of what=l’m looking for.
Epstein: Understood, , I will see you on st Barth, the ratio on my island might m=ke Talilah uncomfortable
Musk: Ratio is not a problem for Talulah
It
may be true that Musk declined one or more invitations to visit, but he
also tried to make plans to visit multiple times. In addition to the
aforementioned change, he emailed Epstein on December 14, 2013
saying he was going to be in the Virgin Islands “over the holidays,”
and asked “Is there a good time to visit?” In my opinion it sort of
undermines the inherent morality of rejecting offers to be taken to
Epstein’s island if you also repeatedly attempt to visit Epstein’s
island.
Also, his tune has changed on this I’m-the-guy-who-declined-Epstein narrative. When he phrased this in the past,
he said “Epstein tried to get me to go to his island and I REFUSED.” He
may have never gone, but “REFUSED” overstates things at best.
There’s
certainly no proof of a crime having been committed here, and as others
have noted it looks from the emails like the timing didn’t work out for
Musk to visit the island. At times Musk really did demur, but at one
point it was Epstein who called off the plan. And Epstein did persist into 2014 trying to get Musk to visit the island, which it appears he never did.
But there can be little doubt that the record from earlier years shows strong evidence of a guy wanting to party his ass off on an island he knew to be overwhelmingly full of females of one age or another, and that these females were there at the pleasure of a convicted solicitor of prostitutes and accused underage sex-haver. Disputing this would involve some fascinating counter-narrative, perhaps about Musk being a mole for that anti-human-trafficking militia from the movie Sound of Freedom or something like that.
On Saturday morning, Musk did not proffer any such counter-narrative that could repair the supposedly false interpretations of his detractors—just a call for the real evildoers to be brought to justice in what is now his pinned post on X:
“What matters is not release of some subset of the Epstein files, but rather the prosecution of those who committed heinous crimes with Epstein. When there is at least one arrest, some justice will have been done. If not, this is all performative. Nothing but a distraction.”
But until he furnishes the public with a plausible excuse, his ass is hanging out quite a bit unfortunately, and he could, at the very least, spare us all from his highroading and grandstanding.
Explore more on these topics
Share this story