US officials predict quick end to conflict, oil price drop
Iran asserts strength, rejects any talks with US
Global oil supply disrupted, Strait of Hormuz remains closed
DUBAI/JERUSALEM/PALM
BEACH, Florida, March 15 (Reuters) - U.S. officials responding to
economic uncertainty over high oil prices predicted on Sunday that the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran
would end within weeks and that a drop in energy costs would follow,
despite Iran's assertion that it remains "stable and strong" and ready
to defend itself.
U.S. President Donald Trump threatened more strikes on Iran's main oil export hub Kharg Island over the weekend and said he was not ready to reach a deal to end the war which has shut off the vital Strait of Hormuz and shaken up global energy markets.
The
Trump administration plans to announce as early as this week that
multiple countries have agreed to form a coalition to escort ships
through the narrow waterway but they are still discussing whether those
operations would begin before or after hostilities end, the Wall Street
Journal reported, citing unnamed U.S. officials. The White House did not
immediately respond to a request for comment.
Trump,
who on Friday said the U.S. Navy would "soon" start escorting oil
tankers, has said Iran wants to negotiate, but Iranian Foreign Minister
Abbas Araqchi on Sunday disputed that claim.
“We
have never asked for a ceasefire, and we have never asked even for
negotiations," Araqchi told CBS' "Face the Nation" program. "We are
ready to defend ourselves for as long as it takes.”
With
crude oil prices hovering around $100 a barrel, Trump administration
officials insisted that all signs point to a relatively quick end to the
conflict.
"This
conflict will certainly come to the end in the next few weeks — could
be sooner than that ... and we'll see a rebound in supplies and a
pushing down of prices after that," U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright
told ABC's "This Week" program.
Meanwhile, Araqchi sought to project an image of strength.
"It's
not a war of survival. We are stable and strong enough," Araqchi told
CBS. "We don't see any reason why we should talk with Americans, because
we were talking with them when they decided to attack us, and that was
for the second time."
With
the war entering its third week, Trump said on Saturday that U.S.
strikes had "totally demolished" much of Kharg Island and warned of
more, telling NBC News on Saturday, "We may hit it a few more times just
for fun."
The
comments marked a sharp escalation from Trump, who had previously said
the U.S. was targeting only military sites on Kharg, and dealt a blow to
diplomatic efforts to end a war that has spread across the Middle East
and killed more than 2,000 people, most in Iran and Lebanon.
Washington has brushed aside
attempts by Middle Eastern allies to open talks, three sources told
Reuters, and Iran's Revolutionary Guards said on Sunday they had fired
more missiles at Israel and three U.S. bases in the region.
But
Israel and Lebanon are expected to hold talks in coming days aimed at
securing a ceasefire that would see Iran-backed Hezbollah disarmed, two
Israeli officials said. Lebanon was sucked into the war when Hezbollah
opened fire at Israel, saying it was to avenge the killing of Iran's
supreme leader, and Israel has responded with a fierce offensive.
An
LPG gas tanker at anchor as traffic is down in the Strait of Hormuz,
amid the U.S.-Israeli conflict with Iran, in Shinas, Oman, March 11,
2026. REUTERS/Benoit Tessier/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab
WAR, ENERGY CRISIS LOOK SET TO PERSIST
With global air transport heavily disrupted and no clear end in sight, Iran's ability to choke off traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, the conduit for a fifth of global oil and liquefied natural gas, has emerged as a decisive threat to the global economy.
Although
some Iranian vessels have continued to pass, the passage has been
effectively closed for most of the world's shipping since the United
States and Israel attacked Iran on February 28 at the start of an
intensive bombing campaign that has hit thousands of targets across the
country.
The International Energy Agency on Sunday said oil from its emergency reserves will begin flowing to global markets soon, with member countries pledging to make available 411.9 million barrels.
Trump
on Saturday called on China, France, Japan, South Korea, Britain and
other countries impacted by the choking off of oil supplies through
the Strait of Hormuz to join efforts to reopen shipping lanes.
On
Sunday, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer spoke to Trump about the
need to reopen the Strait, a Downing Street spokeswoman said.
The
Financial Times reported that European Union foreign ministers would
discuss expanding the EU's regional Aspides naval mission, which
protects shipping against Houthi attacks in the Red Sea, to include the
Strait of Hormuz. German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul said he was
skeptical about such a move.
French
President Emmanuel Macron said in a post on X that in a call with
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian he had urged the restoration of
freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz and an immediate end to
attacks against countries in the region, whether directly or through
proxies.
France
has been seeking to assemble a coalition to secure the strait once the
security situation stabilizes, while Britain is discussing a range of
options with allies to ensure the security of shipping, officials have
said.
ISRAEL, IRAN EXCHANGE FIRE
Iran's
Revolutionary Guards said it had fired more missile and drone barrages
at targets in Israel and at U.S. military bases in the region, where
Saudi Arabia said it had intercepted 10 attacks.
Israel
said its jets hit more targets in western Iran, including headquarters
of the Revolutionary Guards and Basij militia forces in the city of
Hamadan.
A
source briefed on Israel’s military strategy told Reuters that Israel
had begun targeting roadblocks and bridges it believed Revolutionary
Guards commanders were using. Iranian security forces detained dozens of
people accused of sharing information with Israel, Iranian media reported.
Reporting
by Maya Gebeily in Dubai, Emily Rose in Jerusalem and Jarrett Renshaw
in Palm Beach, Florida; Additional reporting by Reuters bureaux; Writing
by James Mackenzie, David Morgan and Matt Spetalnick; Editing by Sergio
Non, Chizu Nomiyama, William Mallard, Gareth Jones, Andrew Heavens,
Deepa Babington and Diane Craft
President
Trump speaks to reporters before boarding Marine One on the South Lawn
of the White House in Washington, D.C., on April 29, 2025. Photo: Andrew
Harnik/Getty Images
FCC Chair Brendan Carr threatened to revoke broadcasters' licenses over Iran war coverage, a day after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth singled out CNN and rooted for a friendlier owner.
The big picture: President Trump has taken credit for "reshaping" the American media landscape via intimidation, regulatory leverage and policy pressure that's cast a shadow over newsroom autonomy.
Driving the news: Defense
Secretary Pete Hegseth scolded reporters during his Friday briefing on
the war and targeted CNN, saying "the sooner David Ellison takes over
that network, the better."
Ellison's Paramount is seeking to acquire CNN parent Warner Bros. Discovery, a deal that requires the Trump administration's approval.
Hegseth criticized a CNN story
that cited multiple sources who said the administration underestimated
Iran's willingness to close the critical Strait of Hormuz.
What they're saying: CNN CEO Mark Thompson said in a Friday statement that the network stands by its journalism.
"Politicians
have an obvious motive for claiming that journalism which raises
questions about their decisions is false," his statement read.
Zoom out: Carr has emerged as a top regulatory attack dog for Trump, re-upping his threats to strip licenses from broadcasters who are not operating in the "public interest."
He warnedbroadcasters
"running hoaxes and news distortions" to "correct course" Saturday,
resharing the president's claim on Truth Social that The New York Times,
The Wall Street Journal and the broader "Media" want the U.S. "to lose
the war."
In an exclusive interview with CBS News on Saturday, Carr doubled down, saying that licenses are not a "property right."
Friction point: "Let's
be direct: what Chair Carr is describing is government control of the
press," said Tara Puckey; CEO of the Radio Television Digital News
Association.
"Journalists aren't intimidated by a bully with a
briefcase," she added in a statement, urging reporters to keep doing
their jobs.
The FCC and White House did not immediately respond to Axios' request for comment.
Context:
Though the FCC does not license national networks, it does license the
local stations that carry their programming. Cable networks like CNN
fall outside the FCC's authority.
Public interest
communications attorney Andrew Jay Schwartzman tells Axios that Carr's
"real hammer" is the "implicit threat" of not giving broadcasters
regulatory relief that they want.
The other side: FCC commissioner Anna Gomez, the lone Democrat on the commission, posted on X
that Carr's threats "violate the First Amendment and will go nowhere.
Broadcasters should continue covering the news, fiercely and
independently, without fear of government pressure."
She has maintained the FCC lacksthe authority to revoke licenses over content the administration dislikes. But the threatitself"is the point," she told Axios last fall.
It's evident the pressure alone can shape corporate decisions, especially as massive media mergers come before federal officials.
Trump shared a graphic on Truth Social Saturday gloating over media world changes under his watch, including the appointment of a CBS News bias ombudsman — a commitment Skydance made when seeking approval to merge with Paramount.
Of note: Sen.
Ron Johnson (R-WI) said he opposes "the heavy hand of government no
matter who's wielding it" when asked about Carr's comments on Fox News'
The Sunday Briefing.
"So no, I'd rather the federal
government stay out of the private sector as much as possible. And
really, the federal government's role is protect our freedoms, protect
our constitutional rights."
Threat level: First Amendment advocacy groupFoundation for Individual Rights and Expression also denounced Carr's "warning" as "outrageous."
The
organization cautioned in a statement that "[w]hen the government
demands the press become a state mouthpiece under the threat of
punishment, something has gone very wrong."