Friday, April 10, 2026

stay informed 1

stay informed 1

 https://5calls.org/

 https://www.buildtheresistance.org/

 https://indivisible.org/resource/guide 

https://choosedemocracy.us/

https://choosedemocracy.us/resist-list/ 

https://choosedemocracy.us/what-can-i-do/ 

https://accountable.us/home/trump-accountability-war-room/ 

https://deptofpeoplewhowork.org/ 

https://www.citizen.org/ 

 

 

Browse the ICE List

https://theicelist.org/index.php/Main_Page 

About the ICE List

The ICE List Wiki is a public, verifiable record of immigration enforcement activity in the United States.

It documents incidents, agencies, individuals, facilities, vehicles, and legal authorities involved in enforcement operations. Entries are structured, sourced, and timestamped to support verification, cross-referencing, and long-term analysis. The wiki is intended for use by journalists, researchers, advocates, and the general public.

This project was created by Crust News.

Project status: This wiki is in active development. Structure, navigation, and data standards are being finalised. Older pages may be reformatted as standards are applied consistently.
Using the data

The ICE List Wiki is designed for public use. Journalists, researchers, and advocacy groups use the data to track enforcement patterns, identify repeat agencies or jurisdictions, and contextualise individual incidents. Pages may be cited with attribution.

Warning: Do Not Use Ring Cameras

Amazon’s Ring cameras are integrated into U.S. law-enforcement workflows. Police agencies can request footage directly from Ring users, allowing private home surveillance video to be shared with law enforcement.

In 2025, Ring partnered with Flock Safety, further linking consumer cameras to nationwide law-enforcement surveillance platforms.

Civil-liberties groups warn this expands surveillance with limited transparency or oversight. ICE List strongly recommends against purchasing or using Ring cameras.

Read more →

Featured agent

Jack Ravencamp

Jack Ravencamp ICE • Kansas

ICE agent Jack C Ravencamp arrived on our radar due to one of his tattoos, which shows a bad attempt to cover up a swastika. Upon further research, Ravencamp was found to come from a family of people with far-right ideologies. We believe that nazi tattoos on ICE agents is a sign of extreme danger in the USA.

In the news

Recent ICE-related reporting from external news organisations.

  • 2025-11-18: Maryland bill would ban local 287(g) agreements statewide — Del. Nicole Williams plans to reintroduce a bill to prohibit 287(g) agreements in Maryland, with new backing from the state Senate president, signaling growing political resistance to local ICE partnerships.
  • 2025-11-18: Lawsuit over conditions at California City Detention Facility — Seven people detained at California’s largest immigration detention facility filed a federal lawsuit describing sewage bubbling up from drains, lack of medical care, frigid cells, and people forced to rewrap open wounds with dirty bandages at the privately run California City Detention Facility.
  • 2025-11-18: Lawsuit targets conditions at Broadview ICE facility outside Chicago — People detained at Broadview allege prolonged confinement in freezing holding cells, sleep deprivation, and denial of basic medical care, turning the suburban processing center into a site of chronic abuse for those in ICE custody.
  • 2025-11-18: Bucks County sheriff who joined 287(g) program voted out of office — Voters removed the sheriff who signed Bucks County into ICE’s 287(g) program after the agreement became the central issue of the race; the sheriff-elect has vowed to end the partnership immediately.
  • 2025-11-06: [shots, 7 holes': Border Patrol supervisor appeared to brag about shooting woman] — A Border Patrol supervisor who shot a woman after a crash in Chicago allegedly texted “5 shots, 7 holes,” and a judge is now examining whether federal agents mishandled key evidence by releasing his SUV before defense experts could inspect it.
  • More ICE news →

    Featured incident

    Killing of Silverio Villegas González by ICE 2025-09-12 • Franklin Park, Illinois

    ICE agents, including Moore, Arian S., fatally shot Silverio Villegas González during an immigration enforcement operation in a residential area outside Chicago. ICE claimed the shooting was justified by a vehicle-related threat, but body-worn camera footage, witness accounts, and independent reporting have raised serious questions about the accuracy of the official narrative.


    Help identify ICE at airports

    ICE agents are now being documented at airports. We are publishing numbered photo pages so the public can help identify officers involved in enforcement activity.

    Each individual is assigned a reference number. Once identified and verified, they are moved to their own page. You can also help us identify ICE agents seen nationwide on our list of unidentified agents

    Only submit information you can support with evidence. Do not include private personal details, rumors, or speculation.

    Recommend a company to boycott
    Media contact
    Whistleblower tip line

    If you work inside ICE, DHS, CBP, or a contractor and have information about operations, misconduct, or abuses, we want to hear from you.

    Submissions are confidential. We do not log IP addresses or identify sources.

    The .onion link requires Tor Browser. For maximum anonymity, use Tor and avoid submitting from a work device or network.
    Verification and sourcing

    Each page includes a verification status indicating whether claims are supported by public records, media, video evidence, or other documentation. Unverified information is clearly labelled and is not presented as established fact. Pages may be updated as additional sources become available.

    Quick links
    • How to report an incident Step-by-step instructions for submitting an incident with enough detail to verify and map it.
    • Volunteer guide Orientation for new volunteers, from research tasks to safety and OPSEC basics.
    • Deportation agents Overview of ICE ERO officers, how we document them, and how to read agent pages.
    Contributing responsibly

    Submissions should be factual, specific, and supported by evidence where possible. Speculation, harassment, or unverifiable claims are not published. Contributors are encouraged to prioritise accuracy over speed.


     

    Chris Taylor wins Wisconsin Supreme Court race, expanding liberals' majority

    Chris Taylor wins Wisconsin Supreme Court race, expanding liberals' majority

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2026-election/liberal-chris-taylor-wins-wisconsin-supreme-court-race-rcna266253?utm_source=firefox-newtab-en-us 

    Chris Taylor wins Wisconsin Supreme Court race, expanding liberals' majority

    NBC News projects that Taylor defeated conservative Maria Lazar, the fourth straight victory for Democratic-backed candidates in the battleground state’s high court elections.
    Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice-elect Chris Taylor makes speaks to supporters at an election night party on Tuesday, April 7, 2026 in Madison.
    Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice-elect Chris Taylor speaks to supporters at an election night party in Madison.Jovanny Hernandez / Milwaukee Journal / USA Today Network

    Chris Taylor has won a seat on the Wisconsin Supreme Court, NBC News projects, expanding liberals’ majority in the key battleground state.

    Taylor, a state appeals court judge and former Democratic state legislator, secured a 10-year term on the court over conservative Maria Lazar, an appeals court judge who worked in Republican former Gov. Scott Walker’s administration.

    Taylor’s victory in the race for retiring Justice Rebecca Bradley’s seat means liberals will have a 5-2 edge on the swing state’s highest court, putting the majority out of reach for conservatives until at least 2030.

    With most of the expected vote in, Taylor led Lazar by more than 20 points. That's a 10-point swing toward the Democratic-backed side compared to the 2025 state Supreme Court race and a 21-point swing from the 2024 presidential contest in Wisconsin.

    Liberal candidates have won four straight Wisconsin Supreme Court elections, as well as five of the last six. And dating to 2017, Democratic and Democratic-aligned candidates have won 19 of the last 24 statewide races in Wisconsin.

    Taylor, who was backed by the state Democratic Party, held massive fundraising and ad spending advantages over Lazar throughout the race. She had put abortion and voting rights at the forefront of her campaign, much like other winning liberal Supreme Court candidates in the state in recent years. Taylor, a former policy director for the state's Planned Parenthood group, also leaned into messaging that targeted President Donald Trump, which has helped turn out Democratic voters in non-presidential elections in Wisconsin and nationally.

    This year’s race was far quieter and less expensive than the last two Supreme Court elections in Wisconsin.

    In 2023, liberals won a majority on the court for the first time in 15 years. And last year, they maintained that majority after the most expensive state Supreme Court race in U.S. history, into which tech billionaire Elon Musk poured millions of dollars for the conservative candidate. But without a court majority on the line this year, fundraising and enthusiasm were lower across the board.

    In the 2025 race, groups and candidates spent $85 million on ads, according to the tracking firm AdImpact. This year's race drew $6.5 million in spending on the airwaves, with $4.7 million in support of Taylor and more than $1 million opposing Lazar.

    The impact of a liberal majority has already been felt over the past several years in Wisconsin. The court overturned the state’s legislative maps, which heavily favored Republicans, resulting in new district lines' going into effect in 2024. Democrats have their sights set on flipping at least one legislative chamber for the first time in 16 years this fall.

    Democrats also hope lawsuits over Wisconsin’s congressional map will make their way before the state Supreme Court. Republicans control six of the state’s eight House seats. They are also eyeing action on the court that could scale back or overturn a raft of other conservative legislation from previous GOP administrations, including a law that eliminated most collective bargaining rights for public workers.

    And last year, the court ruled 4-3 to formally strike down a near-total abortion ban from 1849 that had gone into effect after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.

    Liberals will have yet another opportunity to expand their Wisconsin Supreme Court majority next year, with conservative Justice Annette Ziegler declining to run for a third term. After 2027, three other justices are also set to face re-election for 10-year terms from 2028 to 2030.

     

    Trump Tirade at MAGA War Critics Accidentally Makes Surprise Admission

    Trump Tirade at MAGA War Critics Accidentally Makes Surprise Admission

    https://newrepublic.com/article/208951/trump-maga-war-critics-alex-jones-surprise-admission 

     

    OWN GOAL

    Trump Tirade at MAGA War Critics Accidentally Makes Surprise Admission

    The president just referred to Alex Jones’s Sandy Hook conspiracy-mongering as “horrendous.” Funny thing—he didn’t seem to think so at the time.

    Donald Trump speaks into a microphone with teeth bared
    Alex Brandon/Getty Images
    Donald Trump unleashed a

    Donald Trump unleashed a raging Truth Social tirade on Friday attacking former MAGA allies who have turned on him over his threat to obliterate Iranian civilization. This is making news mostly because it was unusually deranged even by Trump’s standards: It dragged on for 482 words and ripped his foes as “Flailing Fools” and “NUT JOBS.”

    But buried in Trump’s rant is some actual news.

    Trump’s eruption—which singled out critics like Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Marjorie Taylor Greene, and Alex Jones, who have attacked the war and declared Trump’s genocidal threat disqualifying—specifically attacked Jones this way:

    Bankrupt Alex Jones … says some of the dumbest things, and lost his entire fortune, as he should have, for his horrendous attack on the families of the Sandy Hook shooting victims, ridiculously claiming it was a hoax.

    Wait, so Trump thinks it was “horrendous” that Jones claimed the Sandy Hook massacre was a “hoax”? That’s interesting. Because after Jones first pushed his vile conspiracy theories about the 2012 massacre—which took the lives of 20 children and six educators at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut—some in Newtown publicly called on then-president Trump in 2017 to condemn Jones’s conspiracy theorizing about it. And they say it never happened.

    It turns out that there’s a whole backstory here involving Trump, Jones, and Newtown that goes back many years. Now that Trump has reopened the topic, it deserves a recapping.

    To wit: Back in 2015, when Jones was prominently questioning whether the Sandy Hook massacre really happened, insisting that it was staged by the government, Trump was untroubled by Jones’s claims. Running for president the first time, Trump appeared on Jones’s “Infowars” show that year to boost his candidacy. He praised Jones’s ability to get attention with his conspiracy-theorizing, declaring: “Your reputation is amazing.”

    This understandably upset people in Newtown. In 2017, soon after Trump took office, the Newtown school board sent a letter to the new president, urging him to “clearly and unequivocally” recognize that the massacre had happened and denounce Jones’s lies about it. A perfunctory White House statement only condemned “hate” generally.

    “We were hoping the president-elect would denounce Alex Jones for the damage he caused to families who did lose somebody and other families impacted by the tragedy,” Eric Paradis, who helped coordinate the letter as a member of the Newtown town council and whose own daughter survived the shooting, tells me. “He never did. We were disappointed in the lack of response.”

    It’s important to emphasize that Jones’s conspiracy-mongering was profoundly painful to the survivors’ families and many others in Newtown. Conspiracy theorists descended on the town and harassed them. (Their lawsuits against Jones resulted in the liquidation of his personal assets.)

    “We once had people associated with Jones come to a school board meeting to film us while asking why they couldn’t see pictures of the dead children to prove that they existed,” Keith Alexander, chair of the Newtown board of education at the time, tells me. “For a town recovering, it was an awful blow.” Yet Trump would apparently not denounce it.

    All this gets at a deeper reality involving Trump and MAGA. Trump and many of his allies have long enthusiastically accommodated or even embraced the most vile fringe elements on the right, because the Trump coalition relies in part on them. In the wake of the recent controversy over Nick Fuentes’s overt white supremacy, for instance, JD Vance suggested that he would not subject Fuentes or others of his ilk to “self-defeating purity tests.”

    Jones has long been a prime example of this. As Trump rose to power, he would sometimes give voice to Jones’s conspiracy theories in his own words, including the claim that Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama were the founders of ISIS.

    In the case of Jones’s Sandy Hook denial, the deepest sensitivities of a lot of living, breathing human beings were involved. Newtown had experienced the worst trauma imaginable, and the conspiracy-mongering about it was profoundly hurtful to many in the town. Yet while Trump did speak about the shooting back in 2012, when Jones was pushing his vile lies, Trump was apparently unable to see those affected as real people who didn’t deserve such deranged and malicious abuse.

    To the people impacted by the shooting, then, seeing Trump issue this condemnation of Jones now—apparently only because Jones has been attacking him—is doubly insulting. “I’m totally shocked,” Alexander, the former board of education chair, told me. “It amazes me he would return to this to try and get attention.”

    “It’s too bad that it takes something actually happening to the president to make him feel empathy for this community,” added Michelle Embree Ku, a Newtown resident and school board member at the time.

    The perversity here runs deep. In describing Trump as unfit for the presidency over his threat to wipe out Iranian civilization, Jones actually got something right, as did Trump’s other critics. But rather than simply climb down from this monumentally deranged vow to commit massive war crimes and murder tens of millions, Trump is able to perceive criticism of this only as an intolerable display of personal disloyalty to him. Incredibly, that’s what it took to get Trump to denounce Jones and, by extension, fully recognize, well over a decade too late, the horrors that the people of Newtown endured.