Tuesday, August 4, 2026

The ICE List A verifiable public record of U.S. immigration enforcement, built by all of us and open to everyone - incidents, agents, deaths, vehicles, and facilities, documented with sources.


 

The ICE List
A verifiable public record of U.S. immigration enforcement, built by all of us and open to everyone - incidents, agents, deaths, vehicles, and facilities, documented with sources.
https://theicelist.org/index.php/Main_Page 

 

A community effort
The ICE List
A verifiable public record of U.S. immigration enforcement, built by all of us and open to everyone - incidents, agents, deaths, vehicles, and facilities, documented with sources.
 

Drop a link Report an incident Deaths record Most Wanted Incident mapDetention map287(g) map Know your rights Contribute

2,572incidents documented
1,786agents identified
1,182vehicles tracked
81deaths on record
New · the ICE Watch app
Were you there?
Swipe documented incidents and unidentified agents that still need footage or an ID, and drop an anonymous tip. Anonymous, reviewed before anything appears, installs to your phone.

Open ICE Watch →

Most Wanted — share a posterBrowse posters by state →
IL-00126
IL-0007
MD-0002
WA-0002
WA-0001
MN-3476
OR-0001
NY-0005
NY-0004
NY-0003
MN-0001
KS-0002
NY-0001
GA-0002
TX-0004
TX-0003
TX-0002
GA-0001
TX-0001
NJ-0001
I might encounter ICEHow to prepare and know your rights
I just encountered ICEWhat to do and how to report it
I'm at a protestRights, documentation, safety
I'm undocumentedKnow your rights and legal contacts
My family member was detainedHow to find them and get help
I'm a lawyer or advocateResources and how to use the data
I have information to shareSubmit a tip or report
About
About the ICE List

The ICE List Wiki is a public, verifiable record of immigration enforcement activity in the United States.

It documents incidents, agencies, individuals, facilities, vehicles, and legal authorities involved in enforcement operations. Entries are structured, sourced, and timestamped to support verification, cross-referencing, and long-term analysis. The wiki is intended for use by journalists, researchers, advocates, and the general public.

This project was created by Crust News.

Project status: This wiki is in active development. Structure, navigation, and data standards are being finalised. Older pages may be reformatted as standards are applied consistently.

Featured incident

Killing of Johan Sebastián Durán Guerrero in Biddeford, Maine 2026-07-13 • Biddeford, Maine (Pool Street / Hill Street)

Johan Sebastián Durán Guerrero, a 26-year-old man originally from Colombia, was shot and killed on the morning of 13 July 2026 during a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operation in Biddeford, Maine. Senator Angus King said Guerrero was not the operation's target; his wife and young daughter were at the scene, and the agents wore no body cameras. It is at least the 11th fatal shooting involving ICE or Border Patrol agents this administration; the FBI is expected to investigate.

Most wanted
Most Wanted - unidentified agents

Federal agents recorded using force against the public who remain unidentified. Recognize someone? Submit a tip on their entry - your identity is not recorded.

78unidentified agents
20flagged most wanted

See the Most Wanted board →

Map
Incident map

See where immigration enforcement is happening across the country — every documented incident, plotted and clustered by location.

Explore the map →

Free legal help
Florence Immigrant & Refugee Rights Project
Free legal & social services · Arizona

No one in immigration court has the right to a public defender. Detained adults and children often face deportation alone. The Florence Project provides representation, Know Your Rights education, and family support at no cost.

ICE List shares this resource freely. No financial relationship.
Run a legal-aid or immigrant-rights organisation? Request a free spot →


Culture
Featured today
Library
Culture: watch, listen, read

A community-curated library of films, documentaries, music and books about immigration, detention and the fight for immigrant justice - kept separate from the documented record.

Browse the library →

Read the journalism →

For researchers
Using the data

The ICE List Wiki is designed for public use. Journalists, researchers, and advocacy groups use the data to track enforcement patterns, identify repeat agencies or jurisdictions, and contextualise individual incidents. Pages may be cited with attribution.

Coverage
ICE List in the media

The ICE List has been reported on and analysed by independent news organisations, and indexed by academic and civic-tech projects. Read some of that coverage here.

Read the coverage →

Boycotts
Recommend a company to boycott
Media contact

Whistleblower tip line

If you work inside ICE, DHS, CBP, or a contractor and have information about operations, misconduct, or abuses, we want to hear from you.

Submissions are confidential. We do not log IP addresses or identify sources.

Submit a tip

Submit via .onion (Tor link)

The .onion link requires Tor Browser. For maximum anonymity, use Tor and avoid submitting from a work device or network.

Verification and sourcing

Each page includes a verification status indicating whether claims are supported by public records, media, video evidence, or other documentation. Unverified information is clearly labelled and is not presented as established fact. Pages may be updated as additional sources become available.

Navigate
Quick links
  • How to report an incident Step-by-step instructions for submitting an incident with enough detail to verify and map it.
  • Deportation agents Overview of ICE ERO officers, how we document them, and how to read agent pages.

By state
State directory
Guidelines
Contributing responsibly

Submissions should be factual, specific, and supported by evidence where possible. Speculation, harassment, or unverifiable claims are not published. Contributors are encouraged to prioritise accuracy over speed.

Latest
Recent incidents

Newly added or updated incident pages.

See all: See all incidents →


Posted by at No comments:
Labels:

Democrats’ stance on Israel takes center stage in Bush-Bell rematch in St. Louis

 

Democrats’ stance on Israel takes center stage in Bush-Bell rematch in St. Louis

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/08/04/cori-bush-wesley-bell-aipac-primary-01022866 

Skip to Main Content

Democrats’ stance on Israel takes center stage in Bush-Bell rematch in St. Louis

The rematch between Rep. Wesley Bell and Cori Bush puts the U.S.-Israel relationship under scrutiny.

By Cheyanne M. Daniels

08/04/2026 04:45 AM EDT

Cori Bush’s 2024 primary loss to Wesley Bell was heralded as a major defeat for the insurgent progressive movement.

Now, their rematch for Missouri’s 1st District two years later comes at a time when Bush and her allies seem to be winning the battle for the future of the Democratic Party.

The dueling factions in St. Louis highlight the growing tension over not just the domestic ideological divide in the Democratic Party, but the party’s — and country’s — stance on the U.S.'s longrunning relationship with Israel.

The former representative was among the first sitting members of Congress to call Israel’s actions in Gaza a “genocide” — and now she’s betting that her progressive bonafides and her criticism of the top U.S. ally will boost her to victory with the same electorate that punished her last cycle.

“One of us is of the people, by the people and for the people,” Bush said in a recent interview. “The other one is paid for by AIPAC. That’s the difference.”

Like two years ago, a group aligned with the American Israel Public Affairs Committee is the largest outside spender in the race. The organization’s super PAC, United Democracy Project, has spent at least $2.1 million on advertising in the primary, according to ad tracking firm AdImpact.

Roughly half of all adults who identify as Democrats believe that Israel has committed genocide against Palestinians, according to a July AP-NORC poll, an accusation that some human rights organizations have made but both the Israeli and American governments strongly deny.

And from Colorado to New York, several progressives have already tapped into voters’ frustrations with party leadership and successfully wielded their criticism of Israel’s government in order to win.

St. Louis is only one of several races on Tuesday testing the Democratic Party’s establishment: voters will also hit the polls in Michigan to cast their ballots for the progressive, Abdul El-Sayed, or the moderate Rep. Haley Stevens for an open Senate seat.

That race has also become a check for voters’ opposition to AIPAC. And some potential 2028 Democratic contenders have already sworn off accepting funding from AIPAC, another sign of the growing unwillingness to be aligned with the organization.

AIPAC and some Democrats have hit back, saying its critics within the Democratic Party have increasingly made the party inhospitable to those generally supportive of Israel.

In response to requests for comment, AIPAC shared a series of ads knocking Bush for her missed votes and her criticism of the Biden administration and former Vice President Kamala Harris’s 2024 presidential bid. (In a recent debate, Bush claimed Bell delayed his endorsement of Harris, but both endorsed the former vice president on July 21, 2024, the same day she announced her candidacy.)

Bell unseated Bush two years ago with heavy financial backing from AIPAC, the country’s preeminent pro-Israel lobby. They’ve once again spent heavily on his behalf, and this time, he also comes into the race with establishment support — including endorsements from House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and the Congressional Black Caucus PAC.

Bell and his allies have absolutely swamped Bush on the airwaves this year. In addition to UDP’s $2.1 million in ad spending, Bell’s campaign has followed closely behind at over $2 million, according to AdImpact, with over $700,000 more from another super PAC called New Democrat Majority.

Bush, meanwhile, has spent less than $200,000, according to the ad tracker. She boasts the backing of a progressive coalition that includes the Democratic Socialists of America, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and fellow “Squad” member Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.).

Bell has brushed aside the attacks that he’s being bolstered by AIPAC money.

“I think we all can agree that there’s too much money in politics, and I’m a vocal and public supporter of campaign finance reform,” Bell said in an interview. “What I’m not a fan of or a supporter of is singling out certain Americans and saying that they should not participate in our democratic process. That is where I would absolutely draw the line.”

Bell added that the difference between himself and Bush is that he can offer both support and criticism of allies.

“While I’m not the biggest fan of [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu], I still believe that we have to stand with our allies,” Bell said. “That doesn’t mean we’re not going to disagree at times with our allies.”

Bell’s and Bush’s showdown in 2024 was arguably the biggest ideological battlefield for the party that year, outside of the discontent surrounding Biden and then Harris’ presidential bids from progressives critical of Israel.

But two years later, it is just one of many fights that has sprawled across the country. Progressive candidates have been racking up primary victories against establishment figures in a trend that some are calling the “Mamdani effect” after democratic socialist New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani took down Andrew Cuomo in both the 2025 primary and general elections.

Still, this year’s St. Louis rematch isn’t quite the marquee fight it was in 2024. Spending has trended down: Collectively nearly $20 million was dropped on the 2024 contest on advertising, according to AdImpact. That’s roughly four times more than this year’s total.

Usamah Andrabi, spokesperson for Justice Democrats, the progressive group that endorsed Bush earlier this cycle, attributed the broader, nationwide ideological fight to a base that has been “pushed to the edge of desperation by the Democratic Party itself.”

“The Democratic Party’s base woke up in January 2025 realizing that their party’s establishment was unfit, unprepared and frankly unwilling to fight back against Donald Trump and Republican extremists with the urgency the moment demanded,” Andrabi said.

Now, as St. Louis voters head to the polls on Tuesday, Bush cast the eventual outcome in dire terms.

“What is at stake,” Bush said, “is the affordability and the peace of every single person in this country.”

 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels:

Democrat senators ask US SEC to probe Trump Media’s fast feed sale

 

Democrat senators ask US SEC to probe Trump Media’s fast feed sale

https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2026/7/29/democrat-senators-ask-us-sec-to-probe-trump-medias-fast-feed-sale 

Democrat senators ask US SEC to probe Trump Media’s fast feed sale

Trump Media has discussed charging as much as $100,000 a month for the Truth API product for buyers to get first access to top 10 accounts, including Trump’s.

 

Truth Social's logo
Trump Media, or TMTG, unveiled a paid, licensed data feed this month that will give trading firms 'the fastest' ​access to posts from the 10 most influential Truth Social accounts, including that of US President Donald Trump [File: John Minchillo/AP Photo]
By Reuters
Published On 29 Jul 2026

United States Democratic Senators Elizabeth Warren and Adam Schiff have asked the US securities regulator to probe whether Truth Social parent Trump Media’s plan to sell early access to US President Donald Trump’s social media posts breaks the law, according to a letter reviewed by the Reuters news agency.

Trump Media, or TMTG, unveiled a paid, licensed data feed this month that will give trading firms “the fastest” access to posts from the 10 most influential Truth Social accounts, including Trump’s. The letter, sent on Tuesday, ramps up pressure on the product, as well as any Wall Street firms that may have bought the feed, potentially increasing what some industry sources said they believed to be legal, political and regulatory risks.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

“This appears to be an outrageous abuse of the President’s office for his personal benefit that undermines everyday investors and the integrity of our markets, while enriching Wall Street and other wealthy insiders,” Warren and Schiff said in the July 28 letter to Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Paul Atkins.

A spokesperson for the SEC and Atkins, a free-market Republican appointed to the role by Trump who has generally taken a softer stance on enforcement, confirmed receiving the letter but declined to comment further.

“Senate Democrats continue to mischaracterize Truth API either out of ideological opposition to free markets or a failure to grasp the distinction between public and nonpublic information — or, quite possibly, both,” said a spokesperson for TMTG in an emailed statement.

The White House referred requests for comment to the company.

Early access for a price

Trump Media has discussed charging as much as $100,000 a month for the Truth API product, Reuters and other media outlets have reported. Trump’s social media posts have moved markets in the past, and the profits of many top trading firms, hedge funds and financial services firms depend heavily on the speed at which they can trade off such news.

Trump, who owns about 41 percent of Trump Media through a trust his children oversee, stands to profit from the paid access model. The company said it has already signed up customers in advance of the August 1 launch, but did not identify them.

Truth API is the latest example of the president mixing his personal business with presidential affairs, raising ethical issues, Warren of Massachusetts and Schiff from California said. Trump reported last month, for example, that he made more than $1.4bn last year from his family’s crypto projects, including his Official Trump memecoin that critics have alleged is being used to sell access to the president and can be a channel for bribery.

While tech platforms are generally allowed to offer clients early data access, even if it disadvantages some market participants, according to lawyers, some ethics experts have said the Truth API product is different because Trump’s ⁠posts are government information and he has an obligation to disseminate it publicly.

Privacy Policy

Warren and Schiff also noted Trump has in the past used Truth Social to endorse specific stocks including Citigroup, Intel and Palantir, which they said raises the risk of insider trading and of undermining investor confidence that the market is operating on a level playing field.

In the statement, the TMTG spokesperson said: “The Senators must have invented a new theory of ‘insider trading’ based on publicly available information.”

 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)