Wednesday, July 15, 2026

Waiting for Hassan: Another Gaza doctor held by Israel without charge

Waiting for Hassan: Another Gaza doctor held by Israel without charge

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/7/15/waiting-for-hassan-another-gaza-doctor-held-by-israel-without-charge 

Waiting for Hassan: Another Gaza doctor held by Israel without charge

Hassan Khalil Almukayed is among at least 15 Palestinian doctors from Gaza currently in Israeli detention.

Dr Hassan Khalil Almukayed smiling
Dr Hassan Khalil Almukayed was taken by Israeli forces from Kamal Adwan Hospital in Gaza in October 2024 [Courtesy of Nemer Shaheen]

The last time Nadia Almukayed saw her husband, Dr Hassan Khalil Almukayed, was inside the Gaza hospital he had refused to leave.

By October 2024, Israel’s genocidal war on the Palestinian enclave had closed in on the Almukayed family, including his father and other relatives.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

As Israeli forces intensified their assault on northern Gaza, the family found itself trapped inside the region’s Kamal Adwan Hospital, where Hassan worked as a vascular surgeon.

“We could not evacuate northern Gaza quickly,” Nadia told Al Jazeera. “We moved from one place to another in the north until we became trapped inside Kamal Adwan Hospital.”

Nadia Almukayed and her three children: Muhammad, 13, Malak, 11, and Hala, 8 [Courtesy of Nadia Almukayed]
Nadia Almukayed and her three children: Muhammad, 13,  Malak, 11, and Hala, 8 [Courtesy of Nadia Almukayed]

Hassan Almukayed is one of at least 15 Palestinian doctors from Gaza currently in Israeli detention, the most prominent being Kamal Adwan Hospital’s director, Hussam Abu Safia.

Last week, the United Nations Independent International Commission of Inquiry ⁠on the Occupied Palestinian Territory called for an immediate release of Abu Safia, who has been held without charge in an Israeli prison for more than 18 months.

Rights groups and Abu ⁠Safia’s lawyer say there are credible reports he has faced “continued and severe abuse”, including severe torture, and that his life is in imminent danger.

Abu Safia and Almukayed were among the Palestinian doctors who refused to leave dozens of newborn infants they were ‌treating ‌after the Israeli military ordered a forced evacuation of northern Gaza.

2:26
  • Now Playing
    02:26
    Explainer: How Israel dismantled Gaza's healthcare system

    Explainer: How Israel dismantled Gaza's healthcare system

  • Next
    01:04
    Israel demolishes Palestinian home in Masafer Yatta

    Israel demolishes Palestinian home in Masafer Yatta




‘We both know what’s going to happen’

Nadia Almukayed said her husband kept working as the number of Palestinians, including children, killed and wounded by Israeli forces, kept rising.

“From the beginning of the war until Hassan was [taken away], he never stopped serving the patients and the wounded,” she recalled as she huddled with her children inside a tent in al-Mawasi near the southern city of Khan Younis, where camps for the forcibly displaced are now located.

During Israel’s genocidal war, Nadia said her husband used to come home for only a few hours every week, just long enough to check on his family before returning to the hospital.

When Israeli tanks stormed Kamal Adwan in October 2024, the soldiers ordered the families out and onto the road south on foot. The Israeli army, Nadia said, “promised the doctors they would not be harmed and would not be arrested”, as it directed them to return to their departments.

“The occupation [force], of course, was not truthful in its promises,” she said.

As she bid her husband a teary farewell, she told him: “We both know what is going to happen, but we have to accept God’s will and be patient so that He will give us strength and comfort.”

Nadia recalled Hassan answering: “God willing.”

She walked away with their three children: son Muhammad, 13, and daughters Malak, 11, and Hala, 8.

“I remained in contact with him by phone until midnight the following night, when communication suddenly stopped,” Nadia told Al Jazeera. “At that moment, I knew Hassan had been detained.”

Naji Abbas of Physicians for Human Rights-Israel (PHRI), which handles the cases of nearly all “kidnapped” doctors, dates Hassan Almukayed’s arrest to October 25, 2024, two months before Israeli forces captured Abu Safia.

They are being held under Israel’s Unlawful Combatants Law, which permits indefinite detention without trial, a category, Abbas said, “that doesn’t exist in international law”.

1:27
Gaza doctor Hussam Abu Safia appears before Israeli court after more than 530 days in detention

Hassan doesn’t know his father died

Hassan Almukayed has now spent nearly 21 months in Israeli detention without charge. He was initially taken to Israel’s notorious Sde Teiman detention camp and held there for seven months.

Also detained with him was his brother, Mahmoud, a nurse at the hospital. The family’s first proof of where the men had been taken was a photograph they saw online of Mahmoud, stripped to his underwear, being loaded onto a military truck bound for Israel.

Mahmoud was released in the October 2025 prisoner swap deal, part of a “ceasefire” agreement between Hamas and Israel. But Hassan was not. In June last year, he was transferred to Ktziot, also known as Negev Prison, where nearly all the other Palestinian doctors are held.

The brothers do not yet know that their father, Khalil Almukayed, is dead.

Khalil was also trapped inside Kamal Adwan, alongside his sons, when the hospital was overrun. For nearly a week, the family did not know if Khalil, in his 70s, had also been taken.

Only after they posted about his disappearance online did they learn that he had been released after a brief detention. According to the family, Israeli soldiers confiscated his medicine and handed him a water bottle that was punctured at the bottom.

Khalil was let go in what Nemer Shaheen, Khalil’s grandson and a nephew of Hassan Almukayed, said was “a very bad condition, mentally and psychologically”.

He died a couple of months later “of sadness and grief over his sons”, Shaheen told Al Jazeera.

During her sparse messages to her husband, conveyed through his lawyer, Nadia Almukayed admitted: “I have not told him of his father’s death, out of fear for him.”

2:16
‘They brought me here to kill me’ says Gaza doctor in Israeli prison

‘The doctor’ from Jabalia

To the people of Gaza’s Jabalia camp, where Hassan Almukayed was born in 1972, he was simply known as “the doctor”.

The eldest among his siblings, Hassan was close to his parents. “To them… he was the very air they breathed,” said Nadia Almukayed.

He studied medicine in Romania, practised for some time in Sweden, and returned to Gaza in 2010 to take care of his ageing parents and build a life in the camp. Beyond his hospital shifts, he also ran a clinic from his home.

“When people needed medical care, they used to just come and knock on his door – free of charge,” said his nephew, Shaheen, who was evacuated during the war to Egypt, and later Germany, where he is working on a doctoral degree.

Nadia Almukayed said: “If a patient came at midnight or in the morning, knocked on the door and wanted ‘Dr Hassan’, Hassan would wake up and bring him to the clinic and deal with him.”

She said her husband “served everyone without expecting anything in return”.

“There is no malice in his heart,” she added.

Dr Hassan Almukayed rides in a cart pulled by a donkey to Kamal Adwan Hospital after his car was destroyed in an Israeli strike in Gaza [Courtesy of Nemer Shaheen]
Dr Hassan Almukayed rides in a cart pulled by a donkey to Kamal Adwan Hospital after his car was destroyed in an Israeli strike in Gaza [Courtesy of Nemer Shaheen]

When Israel’s genocidal war divided Gaza into two, Hassan Almukayed was one of only two surgeons remaining in the besieged north. “But he took his medical oath to the max, and he stayed,” said Shaheen.

After Almukayed’s car was bombed during the Israeli strikes, he started going to the hospital on a donkey cart.

At home, said Nadia Almukayed, he was a “rare kind of husband – kind and gentle”.

“I miss him terribly in everything I do, even the smallest things – drinking coffee or watching short videos on my phone,” she said.

Whenever their neighbours in the Jabalia camp called for “the doctor”, she said she felt a sense of pride walking beside him.

Interactive - Gaza death count -gaza - July 10, 2026-1771426866
[Al Jazeera]

‘All of them are being starved’

For Abbas, the PHRI member, what happened at Kamal Adwan was part of a “systemic effort” by Israel to target Gaza’s hospitals and push the Palestinians out.

“Each time the Israeli army raided a health facility, they arrested dozens of the staff,” he said, adding that more than 350 healthcare workers were detained during the genocidal war.

He said their removal “left the community in the north of Gaza without health services” and forced the civilians to move to the south.

PHRI says some 55 healthcare workers are still being held by Israel, including 15 senior doctors. The nonprofit group represents 14 of them, including Hassan Almukayed and Abu Safia, in its petition for their release before the Israeli Supreme Court.

Abbas described the conditions in which the doctors have been imprisoned.

“All of them are being starved. All of them are facing, if not daily, a weekly physical violence by prison guards,” he said.

At Sde Teiman, the cell lights never go off.

“We are allowed to sleep just at night – 11 at night, with the light on,” Almukayed reportedly told his lawyer from the prison. If detainees fell asleep during the day, the guards shouted at them through the loudspeakers, he said.

Almukayed has diabetes and suffers from high blood pressure. He has periodically been deprived of his medicine, and was left with untreated scabies for weeks, Abbas said.

During Abbas’s visits, Almukayed also told his lawyer that he was not receiving enough food.

Nadia Almukayed said that other Palestinian prisoners released by Israel have told her that her husband has lost 40kg (88 pounds).

Al Jazeera approached the Israel Prison Service and the Israeli military for comment on the various allegations made by the prisoners’ families and lawyers, but has not received a response from either.

Asked why the doctors remain imprisoned without charge months after a “ceasefire” between Israel and Hamas was agreed upon, Abbas said: “We believe the state of Israel is afraid of the voices of Dr Abu Safia, Dr Hassan Almukayed and other doctors.”

At a court hearing in June, a photo of Abu Safia – that also circulated online – showed that Israeli guards had beaten him “brutally with hammers and batons”, said Abbas.

Hassan Almukayed’s lawyers say they have only seen him four times since his arrest 18 months ago. The last time was in January, with visits subsequently suspended after the United States and Israel started a war on Iran in late February.

1:54
Dr Hussam Abu Safia’s life in ‘grave danger’

Devastated Gaza a ‘heaven’ compared with prison ‘hell’

After Hassan Almukayed’s brother, Mahmoud, was freed, he came back to his home in ruins and the family forced to live in a tent, Shaheen, Almukayed’s nephew, told Al Jazeera.

Despite his shock at the scale of destruction, Mahmoud still described the Israeli prison as “a life of hell”, while Gaza – for its utter decimation – remained a “heaven” by comparison.

But it is not the same Gaza that Hassan Almukayed was taken from.

Before his imprisonment, Almukayed’s mother died of a stroke while in his arms because the fighting in Jabalia had made it impossible to reach a hospital. The family’s home in Jabalia is gone. Nadia Almukayed and their children live in a tent in al-Mawasi, pitched beside Shaheen’s family’s tent.

Nadia keeps the household afloat by working as a mathematics teacher for UNRWA, the UN agency created in 1949 to help the Palestinians forced from their homes when Israel was founded.

She says the struggle of living in a tent is less financial than psychological. “I am exhausted from this life I am living, and from the responsibility that rests on my shoulders,” she told Al Jazeera.

Sometimes, she said she loses patience with her kids, with her husband not around. The hardest part, she added, is watching her eldest son, Muhammad, reach adolescence without his father to guide him.

Nadia explained that she sends messages to her husband through his lawyers when they visit him. Hassan, she said, writes back, referencing the family milestones he has been missing.

During the most recent visit, Hassan Almukayed’s message to his wife was: “Can you please make a cake for Hala? Her birthday is two days from now.”

Every time Abbas met his client, the three Almukayed children would wait with excitement. “They would open up the audio recording of the report the lawyer sent after every visit and listen to it together,” Nadia Almukayed said.

On their birthdays, they talk to Nadia about the parties they used to organise before the genocidal war.

“They would say: ‘If only Baba was with us, he would have made us a party. If only Baba was with us, he would have taken us to the sea. If only, if only.”


 

 

Bernie and AOC Are Taking On AI. Only One of Them Is Doing It Right

Bernie and AOC Are Taking On AI. Only One of Them Is Doing It Right

https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/bernie-sanders-aoc-ai-regulation/ 

 

Bernie and AOC Are Taking On AI. Only One of Them Is Doing It Right.

smccroskey

Sanders is responding to the deceptive narratives floated by the industry. AOC is talking to experts who really understand how AI works.

U.S. Sen Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) hold a press conference to announce the Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act at the US Capitol on March 25, 2026

Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) hold a press conference to announce the Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act at the US Capitol on March 25, 2026.

(Tasos Katopodis / Getty Images)

In December 2025, Senator Bernie Sanders became the first member of Congress to demand a moratorium on the construction of new AI data centers. The costs of the infrastructure that powers generative AI technologies like chatbots and image generators were soaring, but it was not clear that regular people were seeing much benefit. The ban was necessary, Sanders argued, to give “democracy a chance to catch up.”

Sanders could have also said that politicians needed to catch up to the public. Recent polling suggests more than 70 percent of Americans oppose the construction of data centers near their communities. It’s no wonder why: People have been seeing their power bills soar, high-voltage cables rammed through their properties, their water supplies sullied, and their days disrupted by the incessant hum of air conditioners keeping the buildings cool. It’s hard to think of another issue that has so quickly galvanized Americans across the political spectrum.

By March, Sanders had partnered with Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to introduce a bill proposing a national data center moratorium. Some states and city councils had already started to halt construction on their own, but the federal bill would ban construction “until legislation is enacted that safeguards the public from the dangers of artificial intelligence,” such as environmental degradation and soaring electricity rates.

For anyone concerned about the effects of these massive structures and their energy demands, not to mention the tech industry’s reckless acceleration of the AI industry, there would seem to be little to quibble with in such a proposal. Data centers are a material problem for communities across the country, and the generative AI tools they power have been enabling a growing list of harms that policymakers are not acting quickly enough to rein in—if they’re acting at all. But unfortunately, Sanders’s advocacy did not end there.

The same month as the moratorium bill was introduced, Sanders released a video that began to set off red flags among experts who understand generative AI and question the grand narratives being floated by AI companies. In the video, Sanders is seen sitting at a long boardroom table facing a smartphone. The screen displays Claude, the chatbot made by Anthropic, one of the biggest players in the generative AI space, along with OpenAI and major tech companies like Google and Meta.

Over the course of nine minutes, Sanders proceeds to have a conversation with the chatbot on issues like privacy, democracy, and whether Claude would back his proposed data center moratorium. The bot responds with characteristic informality, providing answers that confirm the direction of the questions Sanders is prompting it with.

Current Issue

Cover of July/August 2026 Issue

While Sanders has done admirable work bringing attention to the issue of data centers, his conversation with Claude showed that the senator does not ultimately have a good enough grasp of AI—and that has consequences for how he approaches it.

Part of the problem is that Sanders’s policy approach to AI has been a direct response to the exaggerated claims made by AI companies about their products. By now you’ve probably heard many of them: that AI is going to eradicate vast numbers of jobs, will be societally transformative on a scale we’ve never seen before, and could even gain sentience and turn on humanity.

You can see this in Sanders’s rhetoric. In a New York Times opinion piece published in June, he opened by echoing the industry’s narratives. “Artificial intelligence will almost certainly be the most transformational technology in the history of the world,” he wrote. “It will profoundly affect the life of every man, woman and child in our country.” For Sanders, the focus has become about making sure workers are not displaced by the technology and that the public shares the wealth it creates, as he argues for a policy to put a 50 percent one-time tax on the stock of large AI companies.

But what if that is not the reality of generative AI? Chatbots and image generators are not the economic and social revolution that tech billionaires insist they are. In 2024, author Ted Chiang called them “autocomplete on steroids,” and that’s a good way to understand them. We’re dealing with AI models trained on immense amounts of data and using unimaginable quantities of computation to produce text and images that are designed to seem as though they come from humans, but are really just pulling from a vast repository to best match the prompt they’re served.

It’s exactly why the “hallucinations” cannot be engineered out of the technology. As OpenAI’s own researchers admitted last year, they’re a feature, not a bug, of generative AI. That’s because there is no understanding or thought happening behind the prompt box on a chatbot. It’s just looking for the parts of its dataset that best match the query it’s given.

There’s also growing evidence that the supposedly transformative productivity and efficiency gains AI companies promised are not materializing. Businesses are in the process of pulling back on their AI spending because they aren’t seeing a return on investment, and it’s quite clear that in many cases bosses are using the excuse of AI to lay off workers so they can cut costs—not because AI is really replacing those jobs.

The real risks of AI are not the existential ones that people like Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei obsess about and that Sanders has taken to repeating. Instead, they stem from the more tangible effects AI has on regular people’s lives: how dependence on chatbots can affect cognition and critical thinking, create addiction that isolates people from their human networks, and can even coach them down harmful paths of self-harm and suicide. That’s not to mention how AI has polluted the information environment, enabled the creation of nonconsensual deepfakes, and is actively degrading cultural production.

While she may have been an ally of Sanders on the data center moratorium, Ocasio-Cortez does not seem to have fallen for the deceptive narratives of the AI industry in the way that he has. In November, she warned about the threat of AI psychosis and of the economic damage that could follow the bursting of the financial bubble around AI. She has also been a leader in the effort to give AI deepfake victims the tools to hold perpetrators to account.

In my view, Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez demonstrate two distinct approaches to AI policy motivated by very different understandings of the technology. Sanders is responding to the narratives floated by the industry, narratives that exist to exaggerate the capability of its products and distract from the real material effects the public is feeling from their rollout in the here and now. Ocasio-Cortez, on the other hand, is listening to experts who really understand how the technology works, and to victims who have felt those harms firsthand.

With data centers wreaking havoc across the United States and the wider world, a moratorium on their construction is essential. But responding to the generative AI applications they power requires properly understanding their real harms, not believing the deceptive arguments fed to us by the industry. We need policy that follows the evidence, not the hype.

Paris Marx

Paris Marx is the author of Hyperscale: The Ambition and Excess of Big Tech's Data Empires. He hosts the Tech Won’t Save Us podcast and writes the Disconnect newsletter.

Todd Blanche has fans. Just don’t ask who they are.

 

Todd Blanche has fans. Just don’t ask who they are.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2026/7/15/800070004/news/todd-blanche-has-fans-just-dont-ask-who-they-are/ 

Todd Blanche has fans. Just don’t ask who they are.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and FBI director Kash Patel attend a news conference at the Department of Justice, Wednesday, July 1, 2026 in Washington. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and FBI Director Kash Patel attend a news conference at the Justice Department on July 1.AP

We all know that everybody hates Todd Blanche, President Donald Trump’s favorite lawyer stooge and attorney general pick.

Like, really, really hates. And they’re not shy about saying so.

In fact, 101 former state and federal judges signed a bar complaint against him, and 1,200 Justice Department alumni sent a letter asking the Senate not to confirm him.

Former President Donald Trump, left, standing with defense attorney Todd Blanche, speaks at the conclusion of proceedings for the day at his trial at Manhattan criminal court, May 14, 2024, in New York. (AP Photo/Craig Ruttle, Pool, File)
President Donald Trump walks beside Todd Blanche in 2024, when Blanche worked as Trump’s personal attorney.AP

But wait! Aren’t there people who love, love, love Blanch? Sure, but they seem to want to keep it on the down low, which isn’t really a sign of full-throated endorsement, is it?

So you should take The Federalist’s recent piece with a grain of salt, as it claims that 77 former DOJ officials sent a letter urging the Senate to confirm Blanche—with no link to the alleged letter. Apparently, it goes to another school … in Canada.

So unlike the 1,200 who put their name on the letter urging the Senate to toss Todd, these 77 people who apparently love him aren’t actually bold enough to say so.

Instead, The Federalist names just four people: Gary Barnett, former acting chief of staff and senior counselor to the attorney general; Ketan Bhirud, former associate deputy attorney general; Rachel Bissex, former deputy chief of staff and counselor to the attorney general; and Jonathan D. Brightbill, former acting assistant attorney general.

Gosh, such recognizable and important names! Seriously, who are these people? 

Well, it was probably easy to get both Barnett and Brightbill on board since they already signed a letter urging senators to support a different sleazy Trump lawyer who ascended to the DOJ, Emil Bove, when Trump tapped him for a lifetime seat on the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. 

And Bissex was a “White House liaison” during the first Trump administration, so there’s no doubt that she is also very ethical and impartial.

Fox News is also hyping Blanche, saying that he “racks up massive support.”

Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) speaks at an event for Republican presidential candidate Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) at the Ramada Hotel in Urbandale, IA, January 30, 2016. REUTERS/Aaron P. Bernstein - RTX24QWH
GOP Sen. Chuck Grassley of IowaREUTERS

Per Fox, GOP Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa provided information on everyone who wants the most corrupt lawyer imaginable to be attorney general. But like The Federalist piece, it doesn’t appear to provide any links, and there are no details about it on Grassley’s official news feed

But, gosh, how could you argue with the massive support of “670,000 sworn officers, 300 angel families, families who lost a loved one to crimes committed by undocumented immigrants and 100 bipartisan U.S. attorneys and DOJ officials”?

Still no names—just spokespeople for various organizations, like one that pretends that illegal immigrants are murdering everyone. 

There’s also one from the National Fraternal Order of Police, which boasts more than 300,000 members. But most law enforcement officers are employed at the state and local level, so this is just boasting that a bunch of cops like Blanche. 

Then there’s a “group of 78 former DOJ officials,” none of whom are actually named. 

Look, I get it. I wouldn’t want my name on something supporting Blanche either.

A cartoon by Jack Ohman depicting a billboard of Todd Blanche sucking up to President Donald Trump.
Jack Ohman/Tribune Content Agency

The “massive support” for Blanche is basically about what a great crimefighter he is and how he imprisons imaginary gang members or whatever, but it completely skips over how he’s behaved in the most unethical manner possible, been called out by courts, deliberately blocked the release of the Epstein files, and turned the DOJ into Trump’s personal law firm.

To be perfectly fair to the tens of people rushing the barricades to defend the honor of Todd Blanche, none of those things are bugs; they’re features.

So on the one hand, we have secret support from people ashamed to make their names public, and on the other, we have public, repeated, full-throated denunciations of Blanche—complete with everyone’s government names. 

It’s pretty clear what should be given more weight, but that would require Judiciary Committee Republicans to do their jobs—and that’s something they haven’t really been keen on doing, instead just rubber-stamping the very worst Trump appointees. 

We’ll have to wait and see if that includes Blanche. 

We'll get straight to the point: The financial hardships that Daily Kos is facing this year are tough.

We continue to be paywall-free. We continue to be supported by our readers, not billionaires or corporations. But we need to bring in more revenue. We are leaning on our community more than ever to help make ends meet.

$
OR
Donate with

Was this story worth reading?

Recommending and sharing stories helps us decide which stories are most important to show our readers.

26
Share:





Conversation

|

All comments are subject to our Community Guidelines. The views expressed in comments are those of the individual authors and don't necessarily reflect the views of Daily Kos.

All Comments

  1. Comment by richthetraveler.

    Before my morning coffee, I misread the headline, thinking it said "Todd Blanche has only fans". Almost vomited before reading it again.

  2. Comment by Real Rick.

    Is Blanche even his real name? The verb “blanch” means “to whiten”, which describes what the Felon and MAGA want to do to our country.

    /snark, but only partly

  3. Comment by Gvblackmoon.

    Love how the judge in the slush fund case basically told him to drop his balls on the bar and is now holding her hammer over them. He can't talk about the slush fund at all without being honest about it because she is just waiting to slam that hammer down.

  4. Comment by Stwriley.

    Here's the problem...this won't get rid of Blanche, at least not anytime soon. He stays as Acting AG for as long as the confirmation process lasts, which could be quite a while if Senate leadership slow-walks it because they don't have the votes for confirmation and don't want to defy Trump. Then, even if they reject him in the end, Trump can reappoint him as Acting AG for another 210 days and renominate him. We'll almost certainly have Blanche as Acting AG right through the November elections, which is the very thing we'd all like to avoid.

  5. Comment by kamachanda.

    I wonder what percentage of Blanche supporters are internet bots.

  6. Comment by gratuitous.

    First question at his committee hearing should be "Who won the 2020 presidential election, Joe Biden or Donald Trump?" No fudging answer like "Joe Biden was sworn in as president in 2021" or some other nonsense. The only acceptable answer from Blanche must be one of those two names.

  7. Comment by BenderRodriguez.

    What, you're unaware of the Blanchies? Never heard of Blanchie Nation?

    Do your homework.

  8. Comment by noofsh.

    Toadie Blanche

  9. Comment by Milwrob.

    I don't care if he has fans, defeat him ~ send him back to Orange Caligula as the impotent, a$$ kisser that he is! He protects rapists and pedophiles and in doing so is complicit in their crimes. Soon we may have an AG who will follow the law and arrest those who have broken it. Looking forward to seeing Blanche's name on an arrest warrant!

Trending Conversations