Saturday, July 18, 2026

Brian Tyler Cohen believes in the future of the Democratic Party

 

Brian Tyler Cohen believes in the future of the Democratic Party

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2026/7/17/800071521/news/brian-tyler-cohen-believes-in-the-future-of-the-democratic-party/ 

Brian Tyler Cohen believes in the future of the Democratic Party

BTC Exclusive
Daily Kos spoke with Brian Tyler Cohen about his new book and why he thinks Democrats can be successful in a post-Trump world. AP (original)

President Donald Trump and his MAGA-infected GOP made promises that motivated people to put on their red hats again and vote for a future that seemed to offer something better than what they had. But as promises began to break, from the (non)release of the Epstein files to starting foreign wars to our own affordability issues on American soil, public discourse began to shift. 

However, polling reveals that Democrats aren’t necessarily gaining momentum. Even as Trump’s approval takes a nosedive, voters appear to be fed up with establishment politicians and are looking for fresh alternatives.

For Brian Tyler Cohen, a successful media personality and influencer who has amassed a large following by engaging in the conversation around U.S. politics, this could be an opportunity for the left.

“If you want to win one election for midterms, sure, you can probably skate by on anti-Trump sentiment,” he tells Daily Kos. “But if you want to have a durable coalition that lasts beyond just 2026, it’s going to require having a party that’s willing to figure out how to overcome obstacles to deliver for people in a meaningful way and a lasting way.”

Cohen’s new book, “The Day After: How to Wield Power in a Post-Trump World,” is a blueprint, he says, for how Democrats can successfully gain—and sustain—power in the years to come. 

Check out our conversation below.


This interview has been edited for length and clarity. For the full conversation, please watch the video on Daily Kos’ YouTube channel.

Daily Kos: There’s a lot to talk about, but I want to start with Thursday night’s speech, with really everything that Trump said. What did you take away from this?

Brian Tyler Cohen: I largely expected everything that kind of came from this. Look, Trump is hell-bent on trying to perpetuate these ideas of voter fraud because, at the end of the day, he needs to do the very thing that he claims to be fighting against, which is to interfere in the elections. And he’s pushed forward a lot of different methods to try and do that. We know that he signed an executive order to ban mail-in voting that was blocked in the courts. He refuses to rule out the possibility, along with the rest of his administration officials, of sending ICE to the polls. He keeps trying to pass the Save America Act, which is stalled in Congress right now, which would basically amount to a federal takeover of elections. 

President Donald Trump speaks in the East Room of the White House, Thursday, July 16, 2026, in Washington. (Saul Loeb/Pool via AP)
Donald Trump speaks in the East Room of the White House on July 16.AP

He keeps trying different avenues and failing. And so if he wants to swing for the fences here and really ramp up this effort, then he needs some pretext to be able to do that. That’s what this is. That’s what these reheated election denialism claims are. They are the foundation for him to claim that China or Venezuela or “insert foreign country here” interfered in the election, and as such, to make sure that this never happens again, he has to take extraordinary presidential powers to do so. 

The sad truth for him is that he wouldn’t have to do this if he was operating from a position of strength, but he’s not, and that is the direct result of the fact that he and his party, who have full control of government … have failed to deliver on all of their promises. They failed to deliver on lowering costs and releasing the Epstein files, and no new foreign wars, and keeping gas prices low, or bringing inflation down. 

And they have no Democrats to blame. That’s the double-edged sword of full control of government. There are no Democrats to pin the blame on here, and so you know again this is a testament to the fact that these people are polling poorly. We have midterms coming up, and Trump, in his desperation to try and preserve what power he can, or even try and ensure that there is no democratic oversight of his corruption, is again offering up these last gasps of 2020 era election denial redux. 

Daily Kos: It does feel like this precursor to the midterms should there be a blue wave. And I hear people talking about that as well. Do you agree? 

Cohen: Yes. I mean, the special elections that we’ve seen thus far offer some indication as to where Americans stand in terms of both approval of the Republican Party and willingness to give Democrats another chance. And frankly, you know the interesting part about this is Democrats should not have this opportunity. But for the glaring incompetence of the MAGA GOP, the majority of the country was willing to abandon the left in deference to the GOP in the 2024 election—and they won the popular vote for the first time in decades. They were largely disillusioned with the left, and any competent, adept, good faith Republican Party would have taken advantage of that not just for one cycle, but for a generation as they had been able to do.

But because they’re so focused on self enrichment and blind deference to Trump instead of delivering for their constituents, now we’re in a position where suddenly you’ve got a disillusioned electorate on the right. So Democrats have a rare second bite at the apple. That again, we frankly shouldn’t have the opportunity to have. But since we do, I think that it’s incumbent on Democrats not just to run against what we’re seeing from the MAGA GOP right now, but to make sure that they actually deliver once they get into office. So it’s not just a one and done. 

Daily Kos: You basically just teed up your entire book right here. It’s called “The Day After: How to Wield Power in a Post-Trump World.” So talk to me about that. 

The Day After: How to Wield Power in a Post-Trump World
Brian Tyler Cohen/Harper

Cohen: Well, that’s basically it. I mean, I think that we have seen for so long Democrats be so deferential to institutions and traditions and norms, and in a way, I understand it, because we’ve watched as Republicans have torn all of our institutions of government down, and so there’s a sense that because they’re tearing those institutions down reflexively, Democrats have to be the ones to prop them up. But that’s not where the American electorate is. These are institutions that have largely created conditions where Americans are not thriving right now, and so when you’re the party that’s preserving all of these institutions in a country where 40% of Americans can’t afford a $400 emergency, people are going to obviously revolt against you. 

So I think that Trump has dispelled this notion that our institutions are sacrosanct, immovable, but he’s done it for self-enrichment. He’s done it so that he can build vanity projects. He’s done it so that his family can get rich and have real estate deals. You name it. I argue in the book that Democrats have to have that same mentality toward the sacrosanctity of the institutions, but we have to do it for virtuous reasons. 

You have to be willing to barrel through these norms and traditions and processes, so that you can deliver on healthcare. I argue that we need universal healthcare. The time has come. We need to pass a freedom to vote act and a voting rights act, especially in the aftermath of the Supreme Court gutting it. We have to take serious action on climate change. We have to make sure that workers can have some dignity and pass legislation to increase the minimum wage at a bare minimum. I even argue that we have to expand the Supreme Court so that when we do all of this, there’s not an instant veto for a Republican Party and a Republican movement that’s been perfectly content to strike all of these things down. 

Daily Kos: Well, some recent polling has come out this past month that, to put it frankly, Donald Trump’s approval rating is shitty. It’s not good. It’s terrible. 

Cohen: I think “shitty” was the official language that they used in the sponsored poll, if I’m not mistaken.

Daily Kos: But as Trump’s approval rating has gone down, though, we haven’t seen Democrats really inch up.

Cohen: This is a party that has long since been the party of strongly worded letters. You know, I understand the frustration with the Democratic Party. That’s what I seek to do with this book. Look, I’ve been fortunate enough to be able to sit down with a lot of these elected officials to interview them for my channels, and hopefully, if I can do my part and offer up my message to these people that this is where the electorate is standing right now in terms of this issue. 

Then maybe that will give them an indication of where they need to go, because as I said before, we’re not going to have the automatic support of these people just because they voted against Trump. If you want to win one election for midterms, sure you can probably skate by on anti-Trump sentiment. But if you want to have a durable coalition that lasts beyond just 2026, it’s going to require having a party that’s willing to figure out how to overcome obstacles to deliver for people in a meaningful way and a lasting way, so that we are not just ping-ponging back and forth between Democratic control and Republican control as Republicans tear down the very foundation of government in an effort to consolidate power for themselves. 

Instagram trackers and content blocked

Your Firefox settings blocked this content from tracking you across sites or being used for ads.

Content from blocked embed

Daily Kos: You know, I think a lot about what happened recently. Including the scandal with Graham Platner. There was a lot of support behind Platner, as you know, because he was someone who was challenging the norms people are so tired of. So are you saying we should bring in more candidates, ideally less problematic, like Platner or are you saying these Democrats in power now need to just do something different? 

Cohen: I think the former. I think that in large part we need to see generational change in this Democratic Party. You can do everything you can to teach an old dog new tricks, but at the end of the day, we’re seeing from some of these younger, more dynamic candidates like New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, like New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, even California Gov. Gavin Newsom, are more effective because they’ve grown up in an era where we use social media. 

New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani speaks during a news conference at Gracie Mansion, Monday, March 9, 2026, in New York. (AP Photo/Angelina Katsanis)
Zohran Mamdani speaks during a news conference at Gracie Mansion in New York on March 9.AP

They’re more used to the technology that we use on a daily basis. They’re able to communicate in this political ecosystem, and so we can try to shove a square peg into a round hole, or we can just make it easier for ourselves and elect candidates who are younger, more progressive, more dynamic, more charismatic, more articulate, and more tech-savvy, and I think the success of these candidates who espouse all of those qualities goes to show that it doesn’t have to be this hard. We don’t have to keep trying to shoehorn through aging candidates who are less and less reflective of the electorate to try and represent us.

Millennials like myself have been locked out of political power for so long because we have a generation of politicians who think it’s more appropriate to die in office rather than make way for younger people to come forward. So I think, in large part, we can learn a lot of lessons from Graham Platner in terms of the fight that he was willing to convey and the passion that he espoused for his positions. Obviously, we have to do a much better job at vetting these candidates so that they don’t come with compromises to their character. I think you can and must do both. 

Daily Kos: This tech savviness is of huge importance. We need candidates who are able to spread that message in a way that is reaching voters. But there’s also a lot of misinformation coming out there as well. And you’re a big component of that, of influencers in the media space where information is very fragile. How do you feel about handling politics moving forward in a place where information isn’t really regulated in a safe, reliable way?

Cohen: That’s the difficult part. I think what’s important right now is building up the progressive media ecosystem because we have seen such an asymmetry between the right and the left for years. The right-wing media ecosystem, especially the independent space, was so well funded, and the Democrats … just said, “Okay, well, we have liberal media, we have ABC and CBS and NBC, and so we’re good.” And this came at the same time that fewer and fewer people were tuning in to those outlets because they started moving to digital spaces. 

Republicans saw a need because they weren’t getting what they needed from legacy media outlets on TV. They started investing in these spaces. They started investing in Daily Wire and Daily Caller and Megyn Kelly, Alex Jones. I mean, Ben Shapiro. 

Daily Kos: In personalities. 

Cohen: Correct, and it hit at the same time that influencer culture really started to build up. So there was a confluence of events that really benefited the GOP, and that came to a head in the 2024 election, where we had so little infrastructure and the right had so much well-established infrastructure that we couldn’t get our message out. And it felt, for my entire career in politics, like Democrats are just chasing narratives, trying to debunk and rebut whatever Republicans are saying. And when we finally can get the fact check out, the Republicans have moved on to something else. 

And before you know it, you have an entire presidential campaign where the prevailing narrative is about trans swimmers. I mean, something that doesn’t impact Americans at all.

I’ve started a 501(c)(4) called Chorus, where we try and build up some infrastructure and invest in content creators across not only the political spectrum, but the non-political spectrum, to try and get more voices into this space, especially as more and more people move to their phones and the internet to get news. And so I think you have a right wing that has such a proclivity to just vomit out mis- and disinformation, and the only way to stop that is to make sure that we can do what they do in the sense of flooding the zone and get accurate information out, so that we’re not just chasing after false narratives that are being put there by Republicans. 

Daily Kos: There was a report that came out some months ago by Taylor Lorenz for Wired. She said that Chorus was taking money from a dark money group called the Sixteen Thirty Fund. How did you respond to that? 

Cohen: So I mean, talk about misinformation online. Sixteen Thirty was a fiscal sponsor.  Sixteen Thirty Fund didn’t fund Chorus. Chorus was self-funded, and there were, I think—at this point we have had 7,000 donors.

But I think the broader point that the article was contending was that there is an issue with disclosure for content creators, and I think that has merit if you’re talking about content creators advocating for candidates and if they’re being paid to advocate for a certain candidate.

But that’s not what Chorus is. Chorus is basically grad school for content creators. We talk about how they can expand their platforms so that if somebody’s on YouTube, they should also be on Facebook and Snapchat and Instagram and TikTok or vice versa, we teach them how to make content that is engaging for audiences. 

I’m really proud of the work that we’ve been able to do with Chorus, and I think that if some folks weren’t so hell-bent on trying to tear things down, that we might be able to build up some of the infrastructure that we so desperately need in the pro-democracy ecosystem. 

Daily Kos: I want to shift back to your book. You do say a post-Trump world, but, you know, even when Trump leaves office, we’re still going to be in a Trump world. So, what are you imagining there? 

cartoon by Nick Anderson
Nick Anderson

Cohen: I think the question I’ve gotten from most people is, will there be a world post-Trump? And the answer to that, in my opinion, is yes. I wouldn’t be doing the work that I do if I didn’t believe that there would be a time where Democrats are able to take power again and start rectifying all of the issues that we’re contending with right now. 

I think in large part, what we’re going to see from this MAGA Republican Party, is that there’s already a sense of an albatross tied around their necks because they’ve decided to contract every ounce of their autonomy over to Trump. Just as he is contending with all of these failures because he’s focused on self-enrichment, these people are going to have to wear the baggage of that. 

When Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio decide to run for president in 2028, they are going to be the people who were part of an administration that decided to suppress the Epstein files. They’re going to be part of an administration that decided to engage in a foreign war after beating their chests for years about no foreign interventionism. So I think right now, it may feel to them like political gravity doesn’t exist, but I think it exists to an even greater degree, because they own the consequences of the fallout of the Trump administration. 

Daily Kos: Is there in your blueprint a world where democratic socialists, who are rising in popularity, fit into this? 

Cohen: Yeah, absolutely. Part of being a big tent coalition is that you’re a big tent coalition. In places like New York or California you elect democratic socialists, and in places like Texas and Florida, you have more moderate candidates. That’s what politics is. At its core, politics is about building up a coalition. It’s not about purity. It’s not about having people who are 100% ideologically aligned with you. If that’s your goal, you’re going to lose every election. 

You’ll have absolute purity, but you’re not going to have any power to actually achieve any of the outcomes that you desire. So I think that if we can get back to this idea of cobbling together coalitions in very much the same way that Obama was able to do, then yeah, we’re going to have a party with democratic socialists and moderate Democrats. 


Related | Here’s another sign that Democrats are building a blue wave


Daily Kos: I know we’re heading into midterms, but looking at the presidential election, do you see anyone that really stands out to you personally for president?

Cohen: You know, I’m not especially focused on the 2028 race, and I only say that because I do try to push back on the notion that everything is politics as usual. That we can just sit here and kind of opine on who the next Democratic nominees are going to be, as if everything is fine, as if Trump isn’t trying to undermine free and fair elections every day. So I’m kind of focused on what’s immediately in front of us and making sure that the elections go off without a hitch.

Daily Kos: Before I let you go, is there anything we haven’t talked about that you think we should hit on now?

Cohen: I think we covered a lot. Look, I would offer up one more thing, and that is to reiterate this idea that there is a lot I think to be hopeful for in this moment, and it’s meaningful because what we’re contending with is not just a lot of despair, but engineered despair. I think that Republicans and this administration in particular want people to feel helpless. 

And to have seen millions of people take to the streets, whether we’re talking about No Kings protests, to see massive overperformances at elections across the country, even in deep red districts and states, that offers up some hope that there is still political gravity. 

And so, I have a lot of hope for what the future of politics could look like, but I would ask folks to not disengage because there is a light at the end of the tunnel and in large part, that’s what I seek to do with my book: To give people hope about what a Democratic Party, not of yesterday but of tomorrow, can look like and can bring about for people. 

Daily Kos: Brian, thank you so much for taking the time to speak with me.

Cohen: I appreciate it, Alix. I appreciate it. Thank you. 


Related | Can there really be a Turning Point USA of the left?


We'll get straight to the point: The financial hardships that Daily Kos is facing this year are tough.

We continue to be paywall-free. We continue to be supported by our readers, not billionaires or corporations. But we need to bring in more revenue. We are leaning on our community more than ever to help make ends meet.

$
OR
Donate with

Was this story worth reading?

Recommending and sharing stories helps us decide which stories are most important to show our readers.

73
Share:





Conversation

|

All comments are subject to our Community Guidelines. The views expressed in comments are those of the individual authors and don't necessarily reflect the views of Daily Kos.

All Comments

  1. Comment by mimiami.

    Cohen: "Obviously, we have to do a much better job at vetting these candidates so that they don’t come with compromises to their character."

    I hear this a lot wrt "vetting" Democratic Primary candidates without any viable method provided to accomplish.What would a vetting process look like , and (more importantly):

    Exactly who would be in charge of this so-called vetting process?

    Schumer Jeffries, DNC, DCCC?

    Consultants?

    AIPAC?

    NYT, FoxNews, CBS, etc?

    Social Media, DailyKos?

    I thought that's what primary elections were for.

  2. Comment by djbigf.

    Who?

  3. Comment by The Lone Apple.

    The thing about politics that offends me more than anything else is the notion that a lot of politicians seem to have that once in power, once elected to a position, it's rightfully theirs to stay in until they drop dead. I'm sorry, there is no person on Earth who is that important. If you can just have a new Pope when the old one is gone, then a Representative or whatever is not that important. My view of elections is simple: People run, people vote, someone wins. Nowhere in that is someone who is owed a job.

  4. Comment by Democrat in the South.

    Trump and his party control everything right now including the so called election cheating he keeps talking about. So how exactly can he stop something he already is in complete control of but can’t stop with all the power he currently has? He has more power than any president in history but can’t stop the cheating he claims is going on right under his nose but he won’t show anyone. That’s the question/s someone with a camera and microphone in his face should be asking him.

    • Reply by Whatsnuts.

      Trump claimed to have truck loads of evidence the 2020 election was stolen. Now claims to have evidence of 200,000 non-citizens voting. Yet he won't take it into a court of law and put it under oath and put in "on the record". I'm sick of him getting away with his massive lies with no push back.

  5. Comment by IMNOEINSTEIN.

    "Even as Trump’s approval takes a nosedive, voters appear to be fed up with establishment politicians and are looking for fresh alternatives."

    Lots of good ideas. One of the first thing the Democrats must do, in they ever mange to get into power is take the money out of a politics. Lot's of good thing will automatically flow from that. Not at all an easy thing to do, since they are almost dependent on big money as the Republicans these days.

    The second thing is even harder. But it must be admitted that capitalism's "profits priority before everything else" mantra is actually a practice that is truly "the religion" we live or die under, and is largely behind our march to planetary destruction.

    Capitalism must be treated more like a dangerous "controlled" substance, not an infallible medium to be shielded from control by government and the market. Democracy and the Congress must be capable of this task or the vote and democracy mean nothing.

    Ultimately, this is what's behind the attraction of movements like democratic socialism. To put a human face on our economic system and truly democratize democracy and the national agenda.

    • Reply by Paul C.

      I would add that the wealthy must be heavily taxed to fund programs and raise the quality of life for working people. In addition, society cannot be stable when one man has a trillion dollars, when 90% of new wealth is going to the very top. It's a recipe for fascism.

    • Reply by IMNOEINSTEIN.

      Yes, the tax serving to redistribute corporate wealth. I also think we must finally and squarely face the global threat of planetary warming. There is a low tech solution that requires global efforts, both to plant a trillion trees that will breath co2 and release oxygen globally and drastically reduce and eliminate fossil fuels. For that we must all see the need to stop these suicidal wars and work to care for the world and make up for centuries of neglect. We are fast running out of time. Our people must be told the plain truth, our lives all depend on this.

    • Reply by Democrat in the South.

      Or put another way, excessive capitalism leads to socialism.

    • Reply by Paul C.

      Ok, but "excessive capitalism" has a name, "late stage capitalism", and that is basically capitalism headed to fascism.

      Unregulated capitalism always leads to monopolies, which always lead to a growing income divide and, ultimately, fascism.

  6. Comment by Pale Jenova.

    Double haters (those who hate both parties) are swinging hard toward the Democrats now, which will help a lot in the midterms, and may also carry Dems into the trifecta in 2028, but if the Dems do their typical triangulation and accomplish nothing of note, we are back in the fascist soup.

    We need to break the doom cycle.

  7. Comment by Eholburt.

    First thing to do is get rid of the filibuster and make DC a state. As long as there is a filibuster, nothing gets done.

    • Reply by tmseattle.

      Making DC a state won't happen overnight, and I wouldn't be surprised if the Supreme Court puts up roadblocks. There are some legal nuances to doing so, and you can usually count on the court to block any legislation that will interfere with their goal of turning the country into an illiberal theocracy.

  8. Comment by tljdk.

    Thank you🙏 BTC* is an international treasure.

    Btw, parts of the proceeds of the book will go towards funding the endless election related litigation that is very much ongoing and is all but sure to explode in volume around the midterms.

    Also, the forward is by Marc Elias. Another democracy hero.

    • Reply by tljdk.

      *not crypto related. I hate that shit and hope it crashes and burns.

  9. Comment by squarewheel.

    Interestingly Republicans deliver hate, divisiveness, more hate, income inequality, more income inequality and get re-elected at frightening rates.

    • Reply by Brian3.

      Racism is is strong.

    • Reply by A Noah Count.

      I think a lot of that has to do with their having a massive propaganda machine that is wildly successful at blaming Democrats for everything that's wrong, despite they're being the cause of all our grief.

  10. Comment by annieli.

    BTC rules

  11. Comment by Woubbie.

    Picking up my copy at Penguin Bookshop in Sewickley PA tomorrow!

  12. Comment by DebtorsPrison.

    Thank you for this interview. But I have to once again lodge my complaint: Why on earth do Daily Kos staffers, of all people, persist in linking to Amazon for books, as was done here. Billionaire Bro Bezos is not a friend to anything we stand for here at Daily Kos, and you should NOT be sending traffic and business his way.

    For thew record, my own Literate Lizard Online Bookstore offers Brian Tyler Cohen's The Day After: How to Wield Power in a Post-Trump World for 20% off. Here's the direct link: https://theliteratelizard.com/book/9780063495104

    It is part of a 20% off promotion for America's 250th, with dozens of discounted books to reclaim the history Trump is trying to destroy: https://theliteratelizard.com/americas-250th-birthday

    • Reply by Hodges.

      Thank you! We have to put down the pom-poms for Amazon. We have to be honest about what we prioritize; what we demand that morbidly rich corporate oligarchs' supply. Capitalism is one thing; vulture capitalism is an entirely different beast. Who's taking from the poor to give to the rich? We need to give as good as we get- beginning with Kentucky. If Scott Jennings can talk to Mitch for 20-min, why can't the Gov of Kentucky? So, if Mitch won't go to the mountain, the mountain can go to Mitch; their constituents deserve it. Make the Rs own their chicanery. It's easy: What would Rs do?

  13. Comment by iLuvReading.

    I LIKE BTC and have watched many of his videos. I especially like what he said about forming a coalition that includes progressives, Democratic socialists, and moderate Democrats. He's right; we absolutely MUST bring Dems of all stripes together and forget about purity. Insisting on purity within the Democratic party was part of what got the thing back in office. If we're going to win and make this country even better, we really SHOULD come together and stop all this fighting that I sometimes see here.

    • Reply by irishangle.

      Sounds good to me! You did notice that he also said that the Democrats will have to renew, here referencing AOC and Mamdani and once in power will have to deliver which I understand to mean not continue the status quo. So when he says a big tent party it's not just about getting the seats to take power but actually using the power for change. So the debates in here are super important to understanding how the power should be used by the party and to help people understand what is supporting status quo and what means real change.

    • Reply by Paul C.

      So you support Joe Manchin in leadership? And you don't think tossing our values affects our ability to lead, our ability to demand respect, our ability to advocate for progressive legislation? Of course it matters. This is precisely how we got into this mess in the first place, why no one trusts us, why they want to punish us, only voting for us when they want to punish Republicans even more, like now.

      How many times do we have to relive this cycle of despair, ratcheting down ever lower in pursuit of that magical "Big Tent" that comes with no responsibilities or long term consequences, preventing our ability to lead on policy issues? Why do we distrust our value system so profoundly that we would accept anything that comes our way?

  14. Comment by decisivemoment.

    Cohen nails it on the question of institutions. Fact is, Democrats and Independents are even less likely to trust in US institutions than Republicans. Politicians that run on some sort of message or platitude like "protecting institutions" are not listening to their voters.

  15. Comment by Avantare.

    I enjoy listening to his thoughts and definitely agree with quite a bit of what he says. I also enjoy listening to the legal side of things from Glenn Kirchner and Marc Elias. These 3 and others like them have given me hope since Jan 6. I'm 68 later this year, and I've been telling my wife for the past couple of years the new generation of D politicians need to be given the D's boomer generation a path to save this nation. Together, WE can make this happen. I'm starting to finally get some hope back.

  16. Comment by Paul C.

    I agree with much of what he said, especially about allowing a new, more progressive generation to ascend to power, and the need to learn to communicate with people rather than simply assuming and demanding their support. But I think he is being coy about what has been happening over the past 34 years.

    This isn't just a case of your dad's generation of movie actors not being as cool as the younger ones. This is about a corporate, right wing capture of the Democratic Party leading to oligarch capture of our government and active suppression of our democracy, with the resultant collapse of support for our Party among voters. I mean, think about it, no matter how bad Trump gets, and he is circling the drain at this point, the public refuses to see us as having integrity. They refuse to grant us respect.

    This isn't about a lack of sophistication with modern media, this is about a leadership having contempt for a base seen as a threat to the money flowing from the wealthy donors. This is about politics as a sweet gig, a lifelong career, where dying in office becomes the only real goal.

    Why do I draw this distinction, why don't I simply go along with the "wink wink they are old" excuse? Because I see them handing control over to political hacks every bit as corrupt as they are. And When Cohen says we need the proverbial "Big Tent", that we need these Centrists in red regions, this is the same thinking being repeated, as if we have learned nothing about how leadership works and how people will respond to strong leadership. We just saw a dramatic display of this with Bernie and AOC's tour where they shone in blue and red districts alike. It doesn't matter the part of the country, Quality wins everywhere. We just don't respect our own values enough to try.

  17. Comment by StonyB.

    I lean old school, and tend not to pay much attention to social media influencers. That being said, I consider Brian Tyler Cohen to be an exception. To me, he comes off as sharp, engaging and informative. I hope he’s right, and I cautiously share his optimism about the future.

  18. Comment by Digler.

    Great interview. Thanks.

    I like these well articulated changes to get a Democratic agenda to reality.

    • Reply by Alix Breeden.

      authorStaff

      Glad you enjoyed it!!

  19. Comment by BenBanks82.

    Sound reasoning.

  20. Comment by jayden.

    There are some great remarks in the interview. I'd repost them but since we no longer have blockquoting available I'll just say "there are some great remarks in the interview."

    • Reply by Alix Breeden.

      authorStaff

      "thank you"

    • Reply by Alix Breeden.

      authorStaff

      (I can pass along the message to see if blockquoting is something they plan on bringing back)

    • Reply by Sarkazein.

      It wasn't removed. It simply wasn't supported by Viafoura (similar to embeds of videos). If I remember right, this was on the list of "up to Viafoura" and not a decision by DK in general. It's the same reason there's no formatting in general (bold, italic, etc.). The platform doesn't support it. Yet. Hopefully.

Add your comment

Trending Conversations

 

No comments:

Post a Comment