Thursday, May 8, 2025

Tammy Duckworth: Trump’s ‘Partisan’ Purge of Military Officers Is An ‘Affront’ To ‘Meritocracy’

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NlUJIyDd6IA

 May 8, 2025

During a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on Tuesday, Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) slammed President Trump’s firings of military officers. 

 

Transcript

um Senator Duckworth thank you Mr
chairman well one thing that has no
place in our military is the promotion
of people um and the firing of people
based on perceived political loyalty um
and I know we've talked about this at at
length already during his hearing but in
light of the Secretary of Defense um uh
uh statement yesterday where he plans on
uh firing 20% of the general officer the
flag officer ranks and since you're
going to be if confirmed in the role to
advise on this I think it's important
that we revisit this in fact the Trump
administration has shown a troubling
pattern of not only suddenly purging
highly qualified general officers but
also of advancing other officers based
solely on perceived political loyalty
despite those officers lacking the
qualifications for the jobs to which
they're being promoted choosing military
leadership based on partisan criteria is
unamerican and it puts our military
readiness and public trust at risk it is
an affront to the great meritocracy that
our military has represented until this
administration mr tara if confirmed
would you carry you would carry the
solemn responsibility of safeguarding
the readiness talent and professionalism
of our men and women in uniform
including the very important role of
overseeing the conditions and standards
under which service members can advance
in their careers but I have concerns
that you support the removal of senior
military leaders that you consider you
consider to be woke or politically
misguided officers who by all accounts
were carrying out lawful orders and
policies of a past administration would
you have supported firing general
general Timothy Hoff cyber com cybercom
commander and NSA director who had over
33 years of experience in the air force
uh Senator I don't know the individual i
wasn't involved in the firing and I
really have no comment on that
um well yes or no i mean there was no
investigation into him there was no
wrongdoing accusing was just simply
fired by this president
the senator I I have no uh ability to
comment on it because I don't know the
individual i don't know the
circumstances involved i didn't know if
there was an investigation or not all
right would you have supported firing
Admiral Lisa Francetti former chief of
naval operations with over 40 years of
decorated service in the United States
Navy and no investigation on any
wrongdoing on her part senator I have no
information on that uh firing and I I
simply cannot comment on that okay um
you just under oath confirmed that you
support the Trump administration's
reckless purchase i mean you're saying
you have no no comments but these are
two examples of the Trump
administration's disturbing pattern of
suddenly firing expert warriors at the
top of their game disrupting our
national security for political gain
trump has not justified these sudden
vacancies in mission critical roles were
they fired simply because they followed
their oath and executed a previous
civilian leader policy do I have your
commitment that you will not support
firing general officers simply for
executing lawful policies of a past
administration that should be an easy
one yes or no uh Senator you have my
commitment that u we will have a if
confirmed meritocracy that focus on
promoting based on high standards
do I have your commitment that you will
not support firing general officers
simply for executing lawful policies of
a past administration
senator you're asking me to ask a
hypothetical where there could be other
extinuating
hypothetical other extenduating
circumstances i said simply for
executing lawful policies if there was
nothing else
would you fire someone there would be no
there would be no reason to fire anyone
if they're simply following uh lawful
orders okay do I have your commitment
that you will not use officer's record
of executing policies or their personal
beliefs as promotion criteria either
formally or informally
senator again uh it's a hypothetical
situation you're presenting to me the uh
focus of the department uh if confirmed
will be on meritocracy and promoting
those that are most lethal that provides
us the greatest war fighting force that
our young men and women deserve so their
record of executing policies that this
administration may not agree to but were
legal lawful auth policies from a
previous administration or a person's
personal pol um uh personal beliefs will
not be used as criteria to either
promote or not promote them senator I
would see no reason to have any of that
uh play into the promotion uh the the uh
system that the secretary is attempting
to implement is one based on meritocracy
and high standards and and uh if
confirmed I I look forward to working
with this body and uh the the secretary
on uh ensuring that we have the most
capable leaders for that that our young
men and women deserve i hope you live up
to that because practices like firing
officers for following lawful orders uh
put servant members in an impossible
position fearful that they'll be
punished whether they do or do not
fulfill their professional obligations
and more importantly politicizing
promotions and firings have a corrosive
effect on our military and on our
ability to deter and prepare for
conflict so I hope that you will live by
that statement thank you Senator
Duckworth

Delaware court grants win for Twitter in first hearing in Musk trial

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/07/19/twitter-elon-musk-trial/

twitter wins first round

 

donald-trump-recruited-by-kgb-in-80s-and-even-has-codename-claims-former-soviet-spy

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jan/29/trump-russia-asset-claims-former-kgb-spy-new-book


https://archive.is/ohI5R


https://www.the-express.com/news/world-news/163709/us-air-force-plane-spy-plane-lands-moscow-carrying-sensitive-cargo-after-putin-invite


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ex-soviet-spy-makes-sensational-kgb-claim-about-trump/ar-AA1zxhrZ


https://www.the-express.com/news/world-news/163709/us-air-force-plane-spy-plane-lands-moscow-carrying-sensitive-cargo-after-putin-invite


https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/us-news/donald-trump-recruited-kgb-codename-34726995


https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/kgb-spy-trump-asset-russia-b1794955.html


https://bylinetimes.com/2025/02/21/donald-trump-was-recruited-by-the-kgb-under-codename-krasnov-claims-former-soviet-spy-chief/


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/donald-trump-recruited-by-kgb-in-80s-and-even-has-codename-claims-former-soviet-spy/ar-AA1zwS2y


https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2025/2/21/2305351/-Magic-Disappearing-DB-Story-About-Allegations-Trump-Was-Recruited-as-a-Russian-Asset


https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2025/2/21/2305375/-Before-Trump-was-exposed-as-Krasnov-and-after


https://www.dailykos.com/story/2025/2/21/2305257/-Krasnov

Trump tariffs Trump now wants everyone to stop asking when the trade deals are coming Trump and his team

 https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/trump-trade-deals-coming-rcna205340

 

Trump now wants everyone to stop asking when the trade deals are coming

Trump and his team were touting all the countries eager to make deals with the U.S. on trade. They changed their tune when it became clear such deals wouldn't materialize quickly.
Get more news
on

WASHINGTON — Just a few weeks ago, President Donald Trump and White House aides were boasting that his tariffs would force a legion of foreign nations to rush into new trade deals — and that Trump's prowess would yield more favorable terms for the U.S.

“I’m telling you, these countries are calling us up, kissing my a--,” Trump said last month before his reciprocal tariffs were due to go into effect. "They are dying to make a deal. ‘Please, please, sir, make a deal. I’ll do anything. I’ll do anything, sir!’”

Follow live politics coverage here

"We've got 90 deals in 90 days possibly pending here," Trump trade adviser Peter Navarro said on NBC News' "Meet the Press" a few days later — after Trump paused some of his tariffs and declared a three-month negotiating window.

But Trump has changed his tone and his tune in recent days, as it has become clear that trade agreements don't materialize as quickly as he would like and that there aren't dozens in the queue. His shift also comes amid heavy criticism that his tariffs will hike prices for consumers and harm an American economy that had its first negative growth in years in the first quarter.

"You keep writing about deals, deals. When are we going to sign one? It’s very simple. We’re going to say, in some cases, we want you to open up your country. In some cases we want you to drop your tariffs," an obviously frustrated Trump told reporters Tuesday.

"So I wish they’d keep, you know, stop asking, 'How many deals are you signing this week?' Because one day we’ll come and we’ll give you 100 deals. And they don’t have to sign."

It was Trump who set the 90-day clock.

Beyond the ambitious sweep of trying to haggle with scores of nations at once, the U.S. has yet to open discussions with its largest trading partner — China — since Trump applied a 145% across-the-board tariff on that nation's products.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told lawmakers Wednesday that his planned meeting with Chinese officials in Switzerland this weekend amounts to an early phase of negotiations that is not as far along as talks with less-crucial nations.

"On Saturday, we will begin, which I believe is the opposite of advanced," Bessent said under questioning from Rep. Nydia Velázquez, D-N.Y.

The previous day he said that discussions are occurring with a far smaller number of countries than Trump and Navarro have counted and that the time horizon for agreements could be much longer.

"There are 18 very important trading relationships, and we are currently negotiating with 17 of those trading partners," Bessent told the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government on Tuesday. "Approximately 97 or 98% of our trade deficit is with 15 countries, 18% of the countries are our major trading partners. And I would be surprised if we don’t have more than 80 or 90% of those wrapped up by the end of the year, and that may be much sooner."

Bessent went on to say that there could be deals announced this week. And yet, the end-of-year timeline is far different from what White House officials had previously suggested. The change in rhetoric is intentional, according to one White House official who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak on the record.

The substance matters more than the speed, the official said.

"Obviously, we're working as expeditiously as possible, but we're not trying to make deals that are Band-Aids for the sake of making deals," the official added.

Trump has used his authority under an emergency declaration to raise tariffs on U.S. trading partners — and he can lower them in similar fashion if and when he chooses — but he might have to involve Congress for more comprehensive trade agreements. For now, Trump is operating with one blunt-force tool — the levies applied to goods entering the U.S. from abroad — in order to win concessions on both duties and "nontariff barriers" to trade.

"We don't need Congress to pass a bill" because the U.S.-applied tariffs should be enough to win those concessions, the White House official said. "The onus is obviously on the countries we're negotiating with."

On Wednesday night, Trump was ready to again talk about deals — now that, it seemed, he had something to tout.

He said that on Thursday morning, he posted on Truth Social, he would have an Oval Office press conference "concerning a MAJOR TRADE DEAL WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF A BIG, AND HIGHLY RESPECTED, COUNTRY. THE FIRST OF MANY!!!"

Trump Picks Incompetent Wellness Influencer for Surgeon General

https://newrepublic.com/post/194997/trump-surgeon-general-wellness-influencer-casey-means 

Breaking News
from Washington and beyond
Most Recent Post
Trump Picks Incompetent Wellness Influencer for Surgeon General

Trump has nominated Dr. Casey Means, a wellness influencer with no medical degree, to be the nation’s surgeon general.

Donald Trump smiles while looking to his left.
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Trump’s nominee for U.S. surgeon general is beyond unqualified. The president has selected Casey Means, a self-described “wellness influencer” from the Make America Healthy Again ranks, to serve as highest public health official in the land.

“I am pleased to announce that Dr. Casey Means, will be nominated as our next Surgeon General of the United States of America. Casey has impeccable ‘MAHA’ credentials, and will work closely with our wonderful Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., to ensure a successful implementation of our Agenda in order to reverse the Chronic Disease Epidemic, and ensure Great Health, in the future, for ALL Americans. Her academic achievements, together with her life’s work, are absolutely outstanding,” Trump wrote on Truth Social Wednesday. “Dr. Casey Means has the potential to be one of the finest Surgeon Generals in United States History. Congratulations to Casey!”

Trump’s original nominee, Dr. Janette Nesheiwat, was axed for not being sufficiently kooky enough for the likes of Laura Loomer.

“[Dr. Nesheiwat] used her access to Fox News to promote the dangerous Covid vaccine, which is now killing millions of people,” Loomer wrote on X this week. “She tried to shame people who didn’t take the vaccine by calling them global health threats. Vaccines are a matter of PERSONAL HEALTH FREEDOM.”

Means has no active medical license, as she dropped out of her residency after becoming “disillusioned” with basic medicine. She instead decided to commit herself to alternative medicine.

She also has unsurprisingly controversial views on vaccination.

“I have said innumerable times publicly I think vaccine mandates are criminal. I think corruption in the FDA is overwhelming. I think RFK is doing God’s work in calling all this out,” Means wrote on X last November.

“There is no benefit to the baby or the wider population for a child to get this vaccine who is not at risk for sexual or IV transmission. There is only risk. Kids who don’t have this unnecessary pharmaceutical can’t go to school in many states,” she wrote in August, referring to the hepatitis B vaccine. “EVERYONE should become curious about why these interventions are institutionally jammed down our throats and people are made to be heretical whackos for questioning it.”

Actual medical professionals raised immediate alarm after news of Means’s nomination broke.

“Casey Means is a grifter who dropped out of ENT residency & start a company selling glucose monitors & health all to non-diabetics. She doesn’t know basic science, yet claims she’s a metabolism expert,” scientist Dr. Andrea Love wrote on X. “Incomplete ENT residency ≠ expert. Of course she’s up for Surgeon General.”

More information about Means’s confirmation hearing schedule is expected in the coming weeks.

Federal Reserve Rings Every Alarm Bell About Trump’s Economy

Fed Chair Jerome Powell has delivered an alarming warning about Trump’s tariffs causing stagflation.

Fed Reserce Chair Jerome Powell pures his lips in a grim line.
Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

Jerome Powell has once again said what everyone except Trump seems to already know: Lowering inflation while enacting staggering tariffs is virtually impossible.

“If the large increases in tariffs that have been announced are sustained, they’re likely to generate a rise in inflation, a slowdown in economic growth, and an increase in unemployment,” the Federal Reserve chair said on Wednesday. “The effects on inflation could be short-lived, reflecting a one-time shift in the price level. It is also possible that the inflationary effects could instead be more persistent. Avoiding that outcome will depend on the size of the tariff effects, on how long it takes for them to pass through fully into prices, and ultimately on keeping longer-term inflation expectations well-anchored.”

This is exactly what Trump doesn’t want the American public to hear. The president has repeatedly attacked Powell for his honesty, referring to him as “Mr. Too Late” and “a major loser,” and calling for his termination after Powell correctly noted that wanton tariffs cause inflation.

Though Powell didn’t name it, he was clearly referring to “stagflation: slow GDP growth, high inflation, and high unemployment. The Federal Reserve refused to cut interest rates on Wednesday, as Powell described the concerns with Trump’s economic plans.

“Donald Trump’s tariffs mean you could suffer higher prices and lose your job AT THE SAME TIME, Senator Elizabeth Warren wrote on X. “Forget dolls, families will be forced to make impossible choices between necessities like food, housing, and health care.”

Trump’s trade war loses a lot of validity when people like Powell call it what it is: a tax on top of an already high cost of living for everyday people.

Trump Gives Stunning Answer When Asked About Deportations to Libya

A new report says the Trump administration is planning deportations to Libya. Here’s what the president of the United States said about it publicly.

Donald Trump speaking in his gold decorated Oval Office in the White House.
Francis Chung/Politico/Bloomberg/Getty Images

Donald Trump says he doesn’t know whether he plans to deport hundreds of immigrants to Libya, amidst reports that his administration will do so as soon as Wednesday.

“Is the administration sending migrants to Libya?” Trump was asked during a press conference Wednesday afternoon.

“I don’t know,” he responded. “You’ll have to ask the Department of Homeland Security.” Whether Trump is lying or not, his answer does nothing to quell the terrifying possibility that immigrants could be sent to a country whose prisons have been called a “hellscape” and “open slave markets” by human rights organizations.

On Tuesday, U.S. officials confirmed to multiple news outlets that the government was planning to send undocumented immigrants to Libya in what would be a cruel and unlawful escalation of the president’s deportation efforts. In March, Trump unlawfully deported 200 Venezuelan immigrants, the majority of whom had no criminal record, to El Salvador, where they are now being held in CECOT, a mega-prison notorious for human rights abuses.

More than a decade after Libya’s authoritarian state was toppled, the political situation in the country remains incredibly unstable. It’s been plagued by conflict for years, and the State Department advises Americans not to travel there amidst the risk “crime, terrorism, unexploded land mines, civil unrest, kidnapping and armed conflict.” It’s a stunning display of irony given the government may literally send people there against their will.

Libyan officials have denied the country is communicating with the United States, Reuters reported.

The president is reportedly eyeing Africa as a whole as his next target for deportations, which will likely face a flurry of legal challenges. Rwanda has already accepted at least one deportee from the United States, while several other African countries including Benin, Angola, Equatorial Guinea, and Eswatini have been mentioned in various media reports.

Libya Throws Huge, Dangerous Wrench in Trump’s Mass Deportation Plan

Is Donald Trump about to dump immigrants in a country that is unprepared and unwilling to take them?

Donald Trump speaks at a podium in the Oval Office
Jim Watson/AFP/Getty Images

President Donald Trump is planning to send a planeful of deportees to Libya—but both of Libya’s governments say they won’t take them, The Washington Post reported Wednesday.

Abdul Hamid Dbeibeh, the prime minister for the Government of National Unity based in Tripoli, wrote on social media that “Libya refuses to be a destination for the deportation of migrants under any pretext.”

Dbeibeh said that Libya would not be held to any agreements made by “illegitimate entities.”

The Libyan National Army, which controls the eastern half of the country from Benghazi, also released a statement rejecting the arrival of deportees from the United States, saying that accepting deportees would “violate sovereignty in the homeland.”

While the U.S. government only has foreign relations with Dbeibeh’s government, the son of Khalifa Haftar, the general turned warlord in the east, visited with Trump administration officials last month. The meetings were not about deportations, according to the State Department and a Libyan official, CNN reported.

It’s not clear that any formal deal was made to facilitate the removal of immigrants to a potentially hostile host country. Libya’s migrant detention centers are notorious for subjecting detainees to severe beatings, sexual violence, extortion, and forced labor, according to a 2021 report from Amnesty International.

Lawyers for immigrants currently held in Texas have asked a judge for an emergency order barring any potential deportations to Libya. The lawyers argued that carrying out such a flight without warning would “blatantly” violate court orders.

Previous reports said that a military plane potentially carrying hundreds of immigrants could depart for Libya as soon as Wednesday, so it’s entirely possible that wheels are already up on the latest phase of Trump’s inhumane mass deportation crusade.

e This Story