Showing posts with label blowing in the wind. Show all posts
Showing posts with label blowing in the wind. Show all posts

Friday, April 24, 2026

Trump administration to prioritise seeking death penalty, use firing squads

Trump administration to prioritise seeking death penalty, use firing squads

 https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/4/24/trump-administration-to-prioritize-seeking-death-penalty-use-firing-squads

 

Trump administration to prioritise seeking death penalty, use firing squads

Capital punishment remains controversial in the US, with critics warning of innocent people being put on death row.

FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump, next to U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr., makes an announcement linking autism to childhood vaccines and to the use of popular pain medication Tylenol for pregnant women and children, claims which are not backed by decades of science, at the White House, in Washington, D.C., U.S., September 22, 2025. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo
US President Donald Trump has long been a proponent of expanding capital punishment [File: Kevin Lamarque/Reuters]

The administration of United States President Donald Trump has announced plans to expand the use of the federal death penalty, including through the deployment of firing squads.

The announcement on Friday was part of a policy document issued by the Department of Justice, setting out the legal argument for various methods of execution.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

It touted steps for “restoring and strengthening” the death penalty as integral to the pursuit of justice.

“The Department of Justice acted to restore its solemn duty to seek, obtain, and implement lawful capital sentences – clearing the way for the Department to carry out executions once death-sentenced inmates have exhausted their appeals,” the Justice Department said in a news release.

While the Eighth Amendment of the US Constitution outlaws “cruel and unusual punishments”, the Justice Department maintains that execution by gunfire, electrocution and lethal gas are all legally acceptable.

The policy document also takes aim at Trump’s predecessor, Democrat Joe Biden, for implementing a moratorium on the federal executions.

“The federal death penalty has been rendered a dead letter, effectively transforming sub silentio each death sentence into a life sentence,” Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche wrote in a statement.

“This changed when Donald Trump became President.”

Trump has long been an advocate for increasing the use of the death penalty, even before his presidency.

In 1989, for instance, he took out full-page advertisements after the brutal rape of a jogger in Central Park, calling to “bring back the death penalty”. The five teenagers who were arrested and convicted in the case were ultimately exonerated using DNA evidence.

More recently, in November of last year, Trump accused a group of Democratic lawmakers – all veterans of the armed services or the US intelligence community – of “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH”. They had published a video online encouraging military members to refuse illegal orders.

In Friday’s policy document, the administration explained that it will return to using the drug pentobarbital for lethal injections, as it had during Trump’s first term.

It also dismissed a government assessment expressing uncertainty about whether pentobarbital, a neural depressant, “causes unnecessary pain and suffering” during executions.

The Biden administration, it added, “got the science wrong” in stopping use of the drug.

The report also calls on the Federal Bureau of Prisons to consider expanding the federal death row and constructing an additional facility “to permit additional manners of execution”.

Those techniques, it explains, could include the use of a firing squad, a rare form of execution in the modern-day US.

Currently, only five states allow firing squads for executions: Idaho, South Carolina, Utah, Mississippi and Oklahoma. But the pace of such executions is picking up.

Last year, South Carolina authorised at least three people to die by gunfire, the first such executions in 15 years. Idaho, meanwhile, passed a bill to make firing squads a primary method of execution.

While capital punishment is legal in the US, its use is highly controversial.

Last year, for instance, the autopsy of one of the men killed by firing squad suggests none of the bullets struck his heart, prolonging his death.

Critics of the policy also warn that capital punishment is disproportionately meted out against minorities and the underprivileged. They also note the rate of wrongful convictions in death penalty cases, arguing that once the sentence is administered, there is no going back.

The Death Penalty Information Center, an advocacy group, estimates that at least 202 people in the US have been exonerated since 1973 after receiving death sentences.

The Trump administration, however, has argued that capital punishment is a necessary penalty for severe crimes, and it described Friday’s steps to expand its use as a salve for grieving families.

“These steps are critical to deterring the most barbaric crimes, delivering justice for victims, and providing long-overdue closure to surviving loved ones,” the Justice Department said.

Approximately 55 countries permit capital punishment, though there has been a trend towards ending the practice.

Roughly 141 countries have abolished the death penalty, including all but one European nation – Belarus – as well as the US’s neighbours, Mexico and Canada.

US policy, meanwhile, has swung between different extremes. In 2020, the first Trump administration executed the first federal prisoner in nearly 17 years, ending an informal moratorium on the practice.

In the final months of his first term, Trump would oversee a total of 13 executions.

But Biden had pledged on the campaign trail to end federal executions, and when he took office in January 2021, his administration announced a moratorium on the practice.

In December 2024, during the waning days of his presidency, Biden also commuted the sentences of 37 of the 40 inmates on the federal government’s death row to life imprisonment.

In Friday’s statement, Blanche pledged that the Trump White House would seek to reverse Biden’s move.

“Justice had been thwarted,” Blanche said of the commutations. “Under President Trump’s leadership, the Department of Justice will do everything in its power to reverse these failures and restore justice.”


Is Trump rushing to clean his Cabinet for a reason?

 

Is Trump rushing to clean his Cabinet for a reason?

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2026/4/23/800026362/whitehouse/is-trump-rushing-to-clean-his-cabinet-for-a-reason/?pm_source=ICYMI&pm_campaign=ICYMI04232026

Is Trump rushing to clean his Cabinet for a reason?

From left, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, President Donald Trump, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick listen during a Cabinet meeting at the White House, Thursday, March 26, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
Attribution: APCould Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick be Trump’s next victim on the Cabinet chopping block?

President Donald Trump is on a rage-fueled firing spree, soothing his frustration with his dismal approval ratings and his inability to end the idiotic war he started in Iran by axing members of his Cabinet and other top-level administration officials.

In the last few weeks, Trump has sacked Attorney General Pam Bondi, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, and Navy Secretary John Phelan. Secretary of Labor Lori Chavez-DeRemer also left, but given the horrific allegations made against her and her husband, it’s unlikely that her resignation was of her own volition.

And Politico reported on Thursday that more firings could be on the horizon, listing off bumbling fool Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Russian asset Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, and drunken loser FBI Director Kash Patel as potential targets of Trump’s ire.

FBI Director Kash Patel appears before the Senate Judiciary Committee for his first oversight hearing, Tuesday, Sept. 16, 2025, at the Capitol in Washington. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson)
Attribution: APFBI Director Kash Patel appears before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Sept. 16, 2025, at the Capitol in Washington.

But what caught our eye in the Politico piece is not that these imbeciles could be next on the chopping block, but that Senate Republicans are telling Trump that if he wants to make changes he should do it now, as Republicans could lose their Senate majority and be unable to get his nominees through.

One unnamed GOP senator told Politico that it would “make sense to do it now,” referring to possible firings, adding that, “As we get closer to the election … you never know what’s going to happen to the Senate.”

The fact that Republicans are privately expressing concern that their Senate majority is in danger is the latest signal that the GOP knows it’s in deep trouble this fall.

Trump’s approval rating has hit fresh lows, with a number of high-quality surveys finding Trump sinking to the low 30s—as bad as former President George W. Bush saw amid the 2008 financial crisis and opposition to the Iraq War. And we all remember what happened in those elections.

Attribution: By permission of Mike Luckovich and Creators SyndicateCartoon by Mike Luckovich

What’s more, Senate Republican incumbents and nominees are being vastly outraised by their Democratic counterparts, a sign that GOP donor enthusiasm is tanking. 

And a Republican super PAC with ties to Majority Leader John Thune reserved the most money for races in red states that Trump easily carried in 2024. If Republicans have to spend tens of millions defending seats in Ohio, Iowa, and Alaska, things are really bleak for the GOP.

What’s more, Senate Republicans are also publicly nudging their aging right-wing Supreme Court justices to retire this summer, yet another sign they fear their majority is on the rocks and thus would be unable to confirm Trump’s picks to the courts.

Ultimately, Republicans are in trouble this fall. And they know it.

Daily Kos is free for everyone—no paywall, no barriers. Help keep it that way

Daily Kos is committed to keeping all our content free. That's why we don't have a paywall, and never will. However, Daily Kos' revenue is down, and we may not be able to continue producing the quality of work you have come to expect from us. Donations from our readers are our largest source of income. If you value independent, accessible, paywall-free journalism, please consider making a donation today.

$
OR
Donate with


Thursday, April 23, 2026

The Fight Against Warehouse Detention Has Come to Congress

The Fight Against Warehouse Detention Has Come to Congress

 https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/04/the-fight-against-warehouse-detention-has-come-to-congress/

The Fight Against Warehouse Detention Has Come to Congress

With local victories in hand and bipartisan outrage growing, advocates want federal lawmakers to permanently close the door on converting warehouses into detention camps.

Rashida Tlaib speaks at a press conference

At a press conference on April 23, Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) introduced the "Ban Warehouse Detention Act." Bill Clark/ZUMA Press Wire

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.

Laura Spivak, an organizer with Washington County Indivisible, has spent the past few months trying everything to stop the construction of an ICE detention warehouse only five miles from her home. 

“We’ve protested, we’ve written and called, we’ve fought legal battles,” she said at a press conference Thursday in support of the Ban Warehouse Detention Act, a bill Rep.Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.)  is introducing to prohibit the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from using taxpayer funds to purchase, convert, or operate commercial warehouses as immigration detention centers. Senators Cory Booker (D-N.J.) and Andy Kim (D-N.J.) introduced a similar bill in the Senate two weeks ago. 

Spivak has found some success fighting the warehouse detention center in her backyard. Last week, a judge agreed to temporarily block the construction of a Williamsport, Maryland facility, where ICE planned to jail up to 1,500 people. But without more help, Spivak fears that this will only be a temporary victory. 

The Ban Warehouse Detention Act, Spivak said, “prevents local politicians from colluding with DHS to convert warehouses into detention camps, and prevents them from shutting out the voices of residents like us.” 

As of February, the Department of Homeland Security planned to spend over $38 billion dollars purchasing 24 warehouses across the country, in order to detain up to 92,000 people. So far, they have purchased eleven.

Spivak thinks that money could be better-spent doing pretty much anything else. Williamsport’s local library needs renovation, its school buildings need modernization, and investing in tourism could bring prosperity to the town’s historic district. “A prison camp will not help Williamsport develop economically,” she said. “It will drive down property values and bring shame to a town that deserves a helping hand, not a federal slap in the face.” 

In early April, the Department of Homeland Security said they would pause the purchase of any new warehouses while conducting an internal review of facilities purchased under recently-fired Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem. But a pause, Tlaib said Thursday, is not enough. 

“We need to save lives right now,” Tlaib said. She has been in contact with immigrants held in warehouse detention in Michigan, she said: some of them have been held for months after signing letters stating their willingness to leave the country; others are becoming sick due to the conditions in the facilities. 

“A young lady that was in the facility for over a year at 33 years old, and never had a seizure before, had a seizure because of malnutrition and sleep deprivation,” Tlaib said. “I mean, this is a form of torture.” Immigrants at one GEO-group-owned facility in North Lake, Michigan, have launched a hunger strike demanding access to adequate food, medical care, and legal representation. 

The local-level pushback against ICE, meanwhile, continues: there are rapid-response networks in every major city, where residents alert each other to the presence of ICE officers and gather resources for immigrants in their communities. Online maps show current and future detention warehouse purchases planned in communities across the country. And wherever ICE plans to build a facility, protests tend to follow.

Under Tlaib’s draft bill, no agency may “Establish, operate, expand, convert, or renovate any warehouse, industrial facility, tent, soft-sided structure, modular unit, or similar building or structure for the purposes of housing, processing, or detaining individuals under civil immigration authority.”

“Human beings do not belong in warehouses,” said Rep. Jesús “Chuy” García (D-Il.). “From Arizona to New Hampshire, even Republican local elected officials oppose these warehouses. Not one penny of our tax dollars should be going towards these massive detention centers.”

Keep us relentless, independent, and free to read.

For 50 years, Mother Jones has offered honest, investigative reporting you can rely on:

    • Relentless in the pursuit of truth, unafraid to hold the powerful to account

    • Independent from influence or agenda from oligarchs and corporations

    • Freely accessible to every reader, never behind a paywall

But we can’t do any of this without you. Reader support powers our newsroom to stay nimble and fearless, ready for whatever story comes next. If you can, make a donation today.

We Recommend

Latest

 

Wednesday, April 22, 2026

Federal judge blocks Trump administration restrictions on wind and solar projects

Federal judge blocks Trump administration restrictions on wind and solar projects

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/apr/22/trump-wind-solar-clean-energy-order 

 

wind turbines
Electric energy generating wind turbines are seen on a wind farm in the San Gorgonio Pass area on Earth Day, 22 April 2016, near Palm Springs, California. Photograph: David McNew/AFP/Getty Images

Federal judge blocks Trump administration restrictions on wind and solar projects

The injunction pauses policy giving senior Trump official direct sign-off on federal clean energy projects

A federal judge in Massachusetts on Tuesday struck down several Trump administration actions slowing down development of clean energy, including a requirement that all solar and wind energy projects on federal lands and waters be personally approved by the interior secretary, Doug Burgum.

Denise J Casper, chief judge of the US district court for Massachusetts, ruled that a coalition of plaintiffs representing wind and solar developers were likely to succeed on the merits of their claims that the administration’s actions violate federal statute and would cause irreparable harm if the court did not intervene.

She issued a preliminary injunction to stop the administration from implementing the policies, which clean energy advocates said would hamstring projects that need to get under way quickly to qualify for expiring federal tax credits.

The interior department in July said that all solar and wind energy projects on federal lands and waters must be personally approved by Burgum, a layer of enhanced oversight that officials said was needed to end what they said was preferential treatment for these technologies under the Biden administration. Burgum’s order authorized him to conduct “elevated review” of renewable projects, from proposed leases to rights of way, construction and operational plans, grants and biological opinions.

A coalition of regional wind and solar developers sued Burgum and other federal officials in December, saying his actions had the “goal and effect of destroying solar and wind energy” proposals in the United States. They accused Burgum of favoring fossil fuels such as oil and natural gas and said he had intentionally changed longstanding agency processes and legal determinations to delay and prevent the permitting and construction of wind and solar facilities. The lawsuit challenged six final agency actions that it says place wind and solar technologies into “second-class status”.

An interior spokesperson said on Tuesday the department does not comment on litigation, but added: “America sets the global standard for energy production. We do it cleaner, safer, and more reliably than anywhere in the world.”

In his second term, Donald Trump has focused US energy production on fossil fuels, which he says will lower costs for families, increase reliability and help the US maintain global leadership in artificial intelligence. Critics say that change continues US dependence on more polluting energy sources and sets the country apart from a world transitioning toward cleaner energy.

A law approved last year by the Republican-controlled Congress phases out tax credits for wind, solar and other renewable energy while enhancing federal support for coal, oil and natural gas. Three days after signing the law, Trump issued an executive order that further restricts subsidies for what he called “expensive and unreliable energy policies from the Green New Scam”.

The plaintiffs said in a joint statement on Tuesday that the ruling was the first of many steps to bring more affordable energy options to people across the country.

“Clean energy is fast, affordable and here to stay,” the statement said. “We look forward to getting back to work and restarting the impacted wind and solar projects nationwide.”

The plaintiffs are: the Alliance for Clean Energy New York, MAREC Action, Southern Renewable Energy Association, Clean Grid Alliance, Interwest Energy Alliance, Renewable Northwest, Carolinas Clean Energy Business Association, Renew Northeast and Green Energy Consumers Alliance.

Kit Kennedy, managing director for power at the Natural Resources Defense Council, said the Trump administration keeps trying new ways to block the clean energy projects needed to power the grid, and the courts keep striking them down.

“The administration should take the hint and stop these illegal attacks on projects that will help meet surging electricity demand and bring down costs for consumers,” Kennedy said in a statement.

The Associated Press’s climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org .

Related stories

  • US judge allows last of five offshore wind projects halted by Trump to proceed

  • US judge strikes down Trump order blocking wind energy projects

  • How Trump is targeting wind and solar energy – and delighting big oil

  • Ofgem plans to cut wind and solar delays by stripping out ‘zombie’ projects

  • Most new wind and solar projects will be cheaper than coal, report finds

  • 'Coal is on the way out': study finds fossil fuel now pricier than solar or wind

  • Use excess wind and solar power to produce hydrogen – report

  • 'No shame': how the Trump administration granted big oil's wishlist

More from News

  • Middle East crisis live
    Iran says it has seized two ships in strait of Hormuz after Trump extends ceasefire

  • US politics live
    Donald Trump makes baseless claims that Virginia redistricting vote was ‘rigged’

  • US military
    Pentagon asks for $54bn in pivot towards AI-powered war

  • Gaza
    Gaza’s yellow line creeps forward as Israeli forces expand zone of control

  • FBI
    Democrats demand FBI director Kash Patel take alcohol abuse test

  • Health
    RFK Jr faces intense questions in US Senate on measles and flu deaths

  • Boston Marathon
    ‘Two are stronger than one’: Boston Marathon duo praised for helping struggling runner cross finish line

  • US congress
    Georgia congressman David Scott dies aged 80

  • Science
    AI-powered robot beats elite table tennis players