Showing posts with label nothing in my left hand. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nothing in my left hand. Show all posts

Thursday, May 14, 2026

‘Crush their souls’: Democrats ditch the niceties after GOP gains upper hand on redistricting

‘Crush their souls’: Democrats ditch the niceties after GOP gains upper hand on redistricting

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/05/14/house-democrats-redistricting-hardball-00920090 

 

‘Crush their souls’: Democrats ditch the niceties after GOP gains upper hand on redistricting

High-minded appeals to good government are out. Ruthless partisan tactics are in.

Hakeem Jeffries speaks with reporters.

Jeffries has mostly gotten a pass from fellow House Democrats after sinking tens of millions of dollars into the Virginia redistricting fight. | Francis Chung/POLITICO

By Riley Rogerson and Calen Razor




House Democrats say they tried playing nice. Now the gloves are off.

After spending more than a decade pushing for anti-gerrymandering measures and other good-government initiatives, Democratic lawmakers said this week they are gearing up to play political hardball in the wake of stunning court losses on redistricting — potentially for years to come.

“We will beat the far-right extremists,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said Wednesday. “We’re going to win in November, and then we’re going to crush their souls as it relates to the extremism that they are trying to unleash on the American people.”

It’s a marked reversal from years of high-minded Democratic rhetoric that included advocating for independent redistricting commissions, campaign finance curbs and more — even as Republicans used the courts and their control of state governments to consolidate and enhance their own party’s power.

The U-turn was already underway, but it was cemented in recent weeks after the U.S. Supreme Court reinterpreted the Voting Rights Act of 1965 to allow states to eliminate majority-minority districts. Then the Virginia Supreme Court moved last week to invalidate a recent voter referendum paving the way for a Democrat-friendly map.

Several Democratic states, including New York, have been hindered by their adoption of independent redistricting commissions and other processes meant to take partisan considerations out of the drawing of congressional lines. Now Democratic leaders are openly discussing overriding those safeguards.

“All options should be on the table,” Rep. Ted Lieu (R-Calif.) told reporters Wednesday. “And other states that have redistricting commissions should be prepared to have conversations with their legislature and their voters in response to what we’re seeing in the South. And I think all of that is completely fair.”

The party’s anger also translates to a growing appetite to remake the Supreme Court, which many House Democrats say is ushering in an era of “Jim Crow 2.0.”

Rep. Johnny Olszewski (D-Md.), who has introduced legislation to term-limit the justices, said in an interview that the ruling was “a straw that broke the camel’s back.” And Rep. Sean Casten (D-Ill.) said there are tools to “kneecap” the Supreme Court that Congress has never used, such as stripping their power to review lower court rulings.

“I think everybody from the top of our caucus to the bottom are saying we have got to push back on them,” Casten said.

What was especially gutting to Democrats about the two court decisions was that they believed they had battled Republicans to a draw after President Donald Trump kicked off the unusual mid-decade line drawing spree by pressuring Texas legislators to eliminate as many as five Democratic House seats there.

The Virginia referendum last month was seen as a capstone, with voters essentially endorsing a map that would add four Democratic seats. Jeffries won plaudits for spending heavily to get that result and took a public victory lap only to see it all reversed.

Despite the setback, Jeffries has mostly gotten a pass from fellow House Democrats, who say that the GOP efforts in other states had to be countered despite the risks.

“My feeling is, given what was happening around the country, there was no choice but to launch the effort in Virginia,” said Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas), who is retiring after seeing his district radically redrawn.

Jeffries and fellow Democratic leaders laid out an ambitious plan this week to redistrict before the 2028 elections in states like New York, New Jersey, Colorado, Oregon and Washington where their party currently holds power but cannot immediately redraw House lines.

“This is not a war we started,” Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) said. “But as Democrats it’s important that we also get aggressive in that fight.”

The focus on 2028 comes as opportunities to redistrict in 2026 run dry — except for a potential last-ditch pick-up in Maryland, where Democrats want the legislature to eliminate Republican Rep. Andy Harris’ district, even with the state’s primary two weeks away and mail-in ballots already issued.

In light of the court rulings, Rep. Glenn Ivey (D-Md.) said, there’s “enormous pressure to do something, and I think we should.”

Other House Democrats are calling for new investments in state-level races to support legislators who will commit to redistricting efforts ahead of 2028 and the post-2030 Census redraw.

“Democrats are going to be moving to do what Republicans did 15 years ago and that is to focus on state legislatures,” Rep. Kwesi Mfume (D-Md.) said in an interview. The “smartest thing to do,” he added, “would be to control the process.”

The appetite for even more aggressive redistricting could even mean a new push to redraw maps again in California, where voters last year approved a Democratic-drawn map that handed the party five new favorable districts. The hope is that Democrats can squeeze more blue seats out of the state ahead of 2028.

“We were meeting fire with fire. Texas did five seats, California did five seats,” Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-N.Y.), the Congressional Black Caucus chair, said in an interview. “Now … we’ve got to look at all options. We’re not taking anything off the table.”


Monday, April 6, 2026

drumpf says if you believed his pre-election Carrier promise you should be “euphemised.”*

Sunday, September 27, 2020

drumpf says if you believed his pre-election Carrier promise you should be “euphemised.”*

eufem.jpg 

 

Salena Zito: "The press takes him literally, but not seriously; his supporters take him seriously, but not literally."

But apparently some supporters took him both seriously and literally. 

thanks to wapo and slate

* euphemized — post-truth drumpf-speak for education in the meanings of drumpf’s ‘best’ words

 

 

Friday, April 3, 2026

The most transparent administration in history strikes again

 https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2026/4/3/2376175/-The-most-transparent-administration-in-history-strikes-again

 

21
Comments
21 New
no image description available
Donald Trump speaks to reporters on the South Lawn of White House in June 2019.

Under President Donald Trump, the Department of Justice is attacking the real enemy: recordkeeping requirements. 

Yes, Trump just got his pet at the Office of Legal Counsel,  T. Elliot Gaiser,  to whip up a very aggro opinion saying that the Presidential Records Act is unconstitutional.

250826OLCElliotGaiserOfficialPortrait-20-MAT_0374.jpg

Such a great look to have a presidential appointee just baldly declaring that the law requiring the president to keep records is unconstitutional because Congress has no right to tell the president to keep records. It intrudes on his authority to make him do so, and there’s no legislative purpose, and it's burdensome, and on and on and on.

This sort of thing was inevitable once the DOJ became fully captured by Trump. Not just that he would begin treating the OLC like his own personal legal opinion factory, there to spit out whatever he likes, regardless of actual law, but that he would go after the PRA specifically. 

The PRA was enacted in the wake of Watergate and requires that presidential and vice-presidential records be available to the public. So, the president and vice president have to maintain records created during their tenure and leave them behind when they go, at which point they are transferred to the archivist. 

During his first term, Trump routinely violated the PRA by tearing up and throwing away records. Upon leaving office after his first term, he insisted that the PRA meant he could keep whatever presidential records he wanted, forever. You will note that is pretty much literally the opposite of what the law says. 


Related | Trump says executive privilege for me—but not for thee


The only reason Trump wasn’t indicted for violating the PRA over squirreling away classified documents in his fancy bathroom at Mar-a-Lago is that the PRA is a civil, not criminal, statute. So he was indicted under different laws for that little escapade until Aileen Cannon magicked it away for him.

Cartoon by Mike Luckovich

But of course, the PRA still had to go—and Gaiser was more than eager to do so.

Sure, the Supreme Court already ruled in Nixon v. Administrator of General Services that the PRA was not unconstitutional and did not infringe on Nixon’s rights, but per Gaiser, it’s totally different for… reasons.

Gaiser is a handy guy to have at the OLC if you are Donald Trump. Gaiser is a true, true believer. A 2012 Hillsdale College graduate who clerked for Justice Samuel Alito, Gaiser was part of Trump’s 2020 campaign team. During the investigations into January 6, Kayleigh McEnany named Gaiser as someone who was really trusted on “matters of election integrity” and that Gaiser had advised that the vice president had a “substantive” role in certifying elections.

Translation: Gaiser thought it would be totally legal for Mike Pence to refuse to certify an election if doing so would make Trump sad. Keen legal mind there, dude.

Speaking of keen legal minds, it probably bears mentioning that Gaiser clerked for Alito beginning in the fall of 2021. As in, after being a part of Trump’s merry band of election deniers and insurrection enthusiasts.

Besides throwing out a major recordkeeping act, Gaiser was also happy to whip up a little opinion saying that it’s unconstitutional to ban sending firearms through the U.S. mail. He was also eager to crank out dozens of pages striking down as unconstitutional nearly all programs the Department of Education managed that helped increase school enrollment and achievement for non-white students. 

Dude probably waited his whole life for that, let’s be honest. 

Gaiser’s opinions are denser and longer, but at root, they also hold the exact same legal authority as Trump’s executive orders do: absolutely none. If Trump wants the PRA to go away, he can get Congress to change the law, or he can bring a legal challenge to the law, perhaps, in his personal capacity. It isn’t like he has any qualms about maintaining a robust stack of private lawsuits while president. 


Related | How many personal lawsuits does Trump have going right now, anyway?


This isn’t just about Trump not wanting the public to see what he’s doing. It’s about his belief that everything is his—the White House, the Kennedy Center,  you name it. In his mind, his records belong to him, not us. He can toss or keep them as he pleases, but they’re not ours.

It’s the exact opposite of democracy.

Daily Kos relies on small donations to make ends meet

Ad revenue can't support Daily Kos operations—and it hasn't been able to for more than a decade.

Digital ad revenue has declined everywhere, especially for news organizations for whom it was once their lifeblood. Companies are spending less money on ads, and Amazon, Facebook and Google are gobbling up an ever-greater share of what remains. This has left almost nothing for places like Daily Kos. The only reason we've been able to survive is because of the support of readers like you. That's why we're asking:

Can you take one minute right now to donate $5 or more to Daily Kos? It would mean so much to us.

$
ORDonate with
1 group republished

Was this story worth reading?

Recommending and sharing stories helps us decide which stories are most
important to show our readers.
21Comments

Thursday, April 2, 2026

trump caught playing towers of hanoi in caracas

trump caught playing towers of hanoi in caracas
 

 
is gaza (or bogota or mexico city or - greenland?) - next?

 or putin in kiev or xi jinping in taiwan? 

 

Monday, March 23, 2026

Trump says US and Iran in talks after he postpones strikes on power plants

Trump says US and Iran in talks after he postpones strikes on power plants

https://www.cnn.com/world/live-news/iran-war-us-israel-trump-03-23-26 

 

Trump says US and Iran in talks after he postpones strikes on power plants

Israel expands strikes on bridges, homes in Southern Lebanon
00:43

Here's the latest

Trump postpones strike threat: President Donald Trump told CNN there are 15 points of agreement” between the US and Iran after talks this weekend. He announced earlier he will hold off strikes against Iranian energy sites for five days, after threatening to attack if Tehran did not allow the full reopening of the Strait of Hormuz.

Iran responds: Iran’s foreign ministry said there was “no dialogue” between Tehran and Washington, according to state affiliated media. Multiple nations have been passing messages between the US and Iran over the last several days to de-escalate the mounting tensions, sources have told CNN.

Latest strikes: The number of people reported killed in Iran and Lebanon since the start of the conflict is now in the thousands. Several locations across Tehran have been targeted in the latest wave of Israeli attacks, according to Iranian state media.

• Markets react: Oil prices dropped following Trump’s statement. The global oil benchmark tumbled more than 7% to trade below $99 a barrel, having climbed to $114 a barrel earlier in the day.

59 Posts

See how the closure of Strait of Hormuz threatens global supply chains

While the Strait of Hormuz is vital to the global energy supply, its closure also threatens Gulf countries that rely heavily on imported food. CNN’s Nic Robertson got exclusive access to Jeddah Islamic Port on the Red Sea where officials say cargo could increase by 50% over the next month as shippers are forced to reroute.

Iran says it will not mine the Persian Gulf, warns foreign powers not to interfere

US Embassy in Oman issues shelter in place warning

The US Embassy in Muscat, Oman, has issued a shelter in place warning for the entire country because of “ongoing activity,” without elaborating.

In the security alert, the embassy urged people in Oman to find a secure location in their residence or another building and “have a supply of food, water, medication, and other essential items.”

“In case of an attack, stay away from any debris, and monitor news outlets for official guidance,” it said.

Days after the US-Israeli war with Iran began, the US Department of State ordered non-emergency US government employees their family members to leave Oman, the alert said.

“Special plans” for Tel Aviv and regional allies tonight, Fars news says

Iran’s semi-official Fars News Agency reported Monday, citing what it described as informed Iranian sources, that plans are being prepared for potential actions targeting Tel Aviv and some regional allies of the United States and Israel.

Israel says it has struck IRGC headquarters and other military infrastructure in Tehran

The Israeli military has said that it struck one of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ main headquarters today, alongside several other military buildings in the capital city of Tehran.

UK summons Iran ambassador over pair charged with helping "foreign intelligence service"

London has summoned the Iranian ambassador to the United Kingdom in relation to two people charged “on suspicion of providing assistance to a foreign intelligence service,” a spokesperson for the British Foreign Office said in a statement shared with CNN.