Thursday, April 16, 2026

Chef José Andrés warns of multi-year world famine from Iran war

Chef José Andrés warns of multi-year world famine from Iran war

 https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/apr/16/chef-jose-andres-iran-war-famine

a man in a suit speaks to a woman while seated on stage
The World Central Kitchen founder, José Andrés, at the Semafor World Economy conference in Washington on 1Tuesday. Photograph: Elizabeth Frantz/Reuters

Chef José Andrés warns of multi-year world famine from Iran war

World Central Kitchen founder believes the war could cause a ‘silent’ collapse of the global fertilizer trade

The World Central Kitchen (WCK) founder believes that the world is sleepwalking into a massive, multi-year famine, being slow-walked by the “silent” collapse of the global fertilizer trade as a byproduct of the war with Iran.

“I foresee a very big increase in famine across the world by the fall of 2026 and 2027,” Andrés told the Guardian on the sidelines of Semafor’s global economy conference in Washington.

In the wake of disruptions around the strait of Hormuz, a global shipping chokepoint central to ceasefire negotiations between the US and Iran, Andrés pointed to nitrogen fertilizer supply chains, which he says have tightened and are pushing up costs for farmers and raising concerns about global food production

“It is not only oil that leaves through the strait of Hormuz,” he said. “It is also heavy, heavy fertilizers.”

The danger, he explained, was the delay. When fertilizers don’t arrive in time for key planting windows, yields can fall in the following harvest cycle. Disruptions in global trade can ripple into higher prices and lower output, hitting the poorest countries hardest.

“In America, you can have a 2% or 3% increase and people will manage,” he said. “But in places like Haiti, they don’t serve you a kilo of rice, they serve you one ounce at a time. Those people are going to be suffering the consequences.”

There is one solution he has been pushing that he believes is insultingly simple: a 3% “peace tax” based on the total GDP of every country.

“The amount of money we are now increasing in the defense of every single country – if we would only put 3% on the side, there would be plenty of food to make sure we wouldn’t have hunger on planet Earth,” Andrés argued.

Under a Donald Trump defense proposal for 2027, spending would rise to $1.5tn, $445bn more than 2026 levels.

Global military spending had already hit a record-breaking $2.7tn in 2024, the highest ever recorded and the steepest annual rise since the end of the cold war, according to Sipri, meaning a 3% diversion would generate roughly $81bn a year. Oxfam, which also backs the 3% solution, in a 2022 report estimated that donor governments need to invest around $37bn every year until 2030 to tackle both extreme and chronic hunger.

Instead, Andrés said, we choose “mayhem”.

“It seems,” he added, “that we are led by people who like to be warriors”.

That reality is hitting home for WCK, which relies on donations and has over the years served millions of meals in both Gaza and Ukraine. The non-profit organization is going to have to wind down operations in the region because of those high costs.

“We don’t want to scale back, but we have the cash in hand we have,” he said. “The increase in the cost is going to make us make certain decisions … I shouldn’t be in the moment of deciding who eats. Everybody should be fed.”

As the US and Europe grapple with the migration question, the political consensus has coalesced around the idea that there should be more barriers. Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed into law last July, authorized $165bn for the Department of Homeland Security, including $46.5bn specifically for the border wall.

In the European Union, the sweeping new pact on migration and asylum is set for full adoption this June, which would impose mandatory border screening, speed up asylum and return decisions at the EU’s external frontier, expand detention-like processing, and require member states to share responsibility either by relocating asylum seekers or paying financial contributions.

Andrés has a message for those who think the solution is more concrete and blockages. Hunger, he said, is the ultimate border-crosser.

“We can build all the walls we want, but if there are hungry mothers that need to feed their children, there is no wall thick or big enough that is going to stop them,” he said.

Related stories

  • José Andrés: the chef behind Gaza food aid charity that ‘moves towards disaster’

  • World Bank report finds imminent risk of catastrophic famine in Gaza Strip

  • Drought likely to push parts of Somalia into famine by end of year, warns UN

  • Chef José Andrés: 'I wouldn't mind if they told me: you are the food tsar'

  • Deadly Yemen famine could strike at any time, warns UN boss

  • UK's £100m response to South Sudan famine comes from cash already allocated

  • Top UN official warns of continued risk of famine in Somalia

  • Somalia famine could kill 400,000 children, warns Andrew Mitchell - video

More from News

  • Middle East crisis live
    Lebanon and Israel agree 10-day ceasefire to begin within hours, Trump says

  • ICE
    Texas immigration court interpreter detained by ICE says ‘they want to make me disappear’

  • The price we pay
    Utah passes new law to combat overcharges at dollar stores after Guardian investigation

  • US politics live
    Robert F Kennedy Jr testifies to Congress over healthcare agenda and budget requests

  • Virginia
    Justin Fairfax, ex-lieutenant governor of Virginia, kills wife and himself

  • UK
    Revealed: Peter Mandelson failed vetting to become US ambassador but Foreign Office overruled decision

  • Religion
    More US young men than young women say religion is important to them

  • World Cup 2026
    New Jersey governor hits out at Fifa over reported $100 World Cup train tickets: ‘They should pay’

  • Washington DC
    Trump’s triumphal arch plan for US capital faces key federal review vote

 

Congress Will Not Stop the War With Iran

Congress Will Not Stop the War With Iran

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/04/congress-iran-war-powers-trump-authorization-vote/ 

 

Congress Will Not Stop the War With Iran

A new war powers vote failed 52-47, largely along party lines.

A photo of destroyed buildings in Iran. The Iran flag hangs from one of the destroyed buildings. A person is walking on the ground among the wreckage, wearing a black top. The sky is gray.

A flag flies from a residential house damaged in U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran in eastern Tehran, March 12, 2026.Sobhan Farajvan/Pacific Press/LightRocket/Getty

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.

US senators voted 52-47, largely along party lines, against a war powers resolution on Wednesday afternoon that would have stopped the Trump administration from continuing its illegal military campaign against Iran without congressional approval.

Every Republican except Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul opposed the resolution; all Democrats apart from Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania supported it. Sen. Jim Justice (R-W.Va.) did not vote. 

The resolution “directs the President to remove the United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against Iran, unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or a specific authorization for use of military force.” Article 1 of the Constitution grants Congress—not the president—the power to declare war, and the War Powers Act grants Congress the power to halt unauthorized military action by requiring troop withdrawal within 60 to 90 days.

“I’m here to call bullshit on the President of the United States.” Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), who sponsored the measure, said on the Senate floor just before the vote. “Every moment that Donald Trump leaves our heroes mired in the muck of this illegal war of choice in Iran, he is showing that he cares more about saving his own face than leading our troops.”

Duckworth is a veteran who lost both legs serving in the US Army during the Iraq War. In her remarks on the Senate floor, she said the Trump administration has not offered sufficient justification for launching—and now escalating—the war. 

“War is always tragic, but when it’s preventable, when it’s unjustified, it’s not just tragic—it’s a travesty,” Duckworth said. 

The Democratic-led measure was widely anticipated to fail. As I wrote shortly before the Senate’s previous war powers vote in March, which ended in a 47-53 vote against—with Sens. Paul and Fetterman being the same lawmakers to cross party lines—even if the resolution passed, it would ultimately require a two-thirds congressional majority to overturn Trump’s inevitable presidential veto. 

Many lawmakers thus approached the resolution as a way to drive home their stance on the war. In that light, what we saw Wednesday was not reassuring: four such resolutions have now failed since the start of the current war in February, while more than 2,000 people have been killed in Iran, according to the country’s health ministry—possibly many more, with figures not updated since April 3—and the US military has confirmed 13 combat-related deaths across the region.

The truth needs defenders. Be one.

This week is our Spring Membership Drive, and we need to raise 1,000 new donations to fund the critical investigations our team is hard at work on. As of today, we’re only at 200 of that 1,000-donation goal.

Our nonprofit newsroom is funded by donors from every state in the union—blue, red, and purple, all part of a community of readers who care about the future of our democracy.

We’re independent from corporations and uninfluenced by those in power. Our commitment is solely to the truth. That’s only possible because of readers like you, who believe in the importance of independent, fearless journalism.

Be the reason these stories get told. Make a donation today.

We Recommend

Latest


Trump Caves On Pride Flag at Stonewall | Gay USA 4/152026